Tropical developing economies are some of the most vulnerable societies to natural disasters, and by 2050, some 50% of the world's population will live in the tropics. Tropical developing economies already have a shortage of housing which lacks structural quality, durability and is considered non-adequate. Tropical developing economies have an opportunity to utilize locally sourced lightweight natural materials such as bamboo. Tropical countries are substantial producers of bamboo. Bamboo is sustainable, relatively strong, with good tensile and compressive properties. It is a material that can be worked with simple tools and has the potential to be grown locally on a village or even a family scale. Many tropical countries grow an abundance of tropical woody bamboos which can also absorb CO2 at a fast rate, and their fibrous roots can reduce the effects of flooding and landslides. Bamboo can also stabilize slopes to tackle the effects of deforestation affecting many tropical countries including Malaysia and Indonesia which saw some of the highest rates of forest loss between 2000 and 2017. If we are to increase the use of sustainable materials, then we should look to non- or marginally-engineered building techniques to ensure that the most affordable form of bamboo, ‘full culm bamboo’, is enfranchised. Full-culm bamboo also has a low carbon footprint when sourced locally. A commonly claimed barrier to bamboo being more widely used in construction is the fact is that in many developing economies there is a perception of bamboo as the ‘poor man’s timber’ and this can negatively influence the choice of materials used in adequate housing. The reasons these perceptions are prevalent in contemporary society has not been fully explored. This paper documents an initial survey which was carried out using the Likert Scale in Kuala Lumpur (KL), Malaysia and Tanjung, Lombok, Indonesia in June 2019. The aim of this paper is to analyse the initial study design, sampling strategy, data collection instruments and procedures, and identify the main study variables. The outcome of this is to propose a test methodology to quantify a magnitude of the perception of bamboo as the ‘poor man’s timber’ and if surveying is a good means of learning about how we may be able to address negative societal attitudes to bamboo. By understanding societal attitudes to the material of bamboo in construction, we as architects can employ the information to address these concerns and design for the use of materials such as bamboo. Architects can then through inclusive and community participatory design practices, develop adequate housing for urban areas, which is functional and aesthetically pleasing for residents to democratically choose.