The transportation sector is continuously transitioning from combustion engines towards fully electric vehicles and lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are the energy storage device of choice due to their high volumetric and gravimetric energy density.1 However, to meet future targets in terms of driving range and re-/charging times, the state-of-the-art graphite anode graphite needs to be replaced with materials offering even higher energy densities and, especially, better power capabilities.2 Alloying metal-oxides such as ZnO and SnO2 have been widely studied, since they offer high theoretical specific capacities (988 mAh g-1 and 1494 mAh g-1, respectively), while being environmentally friendly and non-toxic. Furthermore, such alloying metal oxides have high densities, which promises higher volumetric capacities compared to graphite. However, these high densities, in combination with the high overall Li+ uptake, result in pronounced volume expansion upon cycling. Furthermore, the eventually irreversible Li2O formation limits the practically achievable specific capacities to the alloying contribution only. It has been shown that this limitation can be overcome by introducing a transition metal (e.g., Fe, Co) into the lattice, leading to a reversible Li2O formation and favorable de-/lithiation kinetics.3,4 This concept of transition metal doping has recently also been transferred to germanium oxide – another example for a Li+ alloying oxide with an even higher theoretical specific capacity (i.e., 2152 mAh g-1) - and was shown to partially enable re-oxidation of germanium to germanium oxide, though (so far) only for the initial cycles.5 Within this study, we tackled the problem from a more comprehensive perspective and elaborate on the effect of different synthesis conditions, the introduction of Fe into GeO2, as well as the impact of different germanium oxide phases on the electrochemical performance. The latter aspect is, indeed, commonly overlooked so far when studying metal oxide anodes. The highly complementary techniques employed include, amongst others, in situ/operando characterization methods such as in situ high temperature XRD, operando XRD and operando dilatometry. Ultimately, we realized lithium-ion cells comprising lithium-rich Li1.2Mn0.6Ni0.2O2 cathodes with a specific energy of about 400 Wh kg-1 and stable cycling for more than 350 cycles. N. Nitta, F. Wu, J. T. Lee, and G. Yushin, Mater. Today, 18, 252–264 (2015).J. Asenbauer et al., Sustain. Energy Fuels (2020).D. Bresser et al., Chem. Mater., 25, 4977–4985 (2013).Y. Ma et al., Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2, 2601–2608 (2018).J. Wu, N. Luo, S. Huang, W. Yang, and M. Wei, J. Mater. Chem. A, 7, 4574–4580 (2019).
Read full abstract