Previous articleNext article FreeJohn A. McCarthy; Stephanie M. Hilger; Heather I. Sullivan; Nicholas Saul (Editors). The Early History of Embodied Cognition, 1740–1920: The Lebenskraft-Debate and Radical Reality in German Science, Music, and Literature. (Internationale Forschungen zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft, 189.) 357 pp., bibl. Leiden: Brill, 2016. €99 (cloth).Gabriel FinkelsteinGabriel Finkelstein Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreVitalism is back. From the dissertations of Michael Dettelbach, Maria Trumpler, Stuart Strickland, and Silvia Waisse-Priven, to the surveys of Peter Reill, Roselyne Rey, and Jessica Riskin, to the biographical studies of Anne Harrington, Ken Caneva, and Robert Richards, to the edited volumes of Guido Cimino, Robert Brain, and Sebastian Normandin, historians have attempted to rescue this venerable idea from the enormous condescension of biology. In similar fashion, The Early History of Embodied Cognition presents a collection of papers from a conference on German Romanticism with the aim of soliciting literary investigations of “the historical contours of the soul-body-mind inquiries of the long eighteenth and nineteenth centuries” (p. 8) in Germany.The editors—John A. McCarthy, Stephanie M. Hilger, Heather I. Sullivan, and Nicholas Saul—divide the essays into four sections. In the first part, “Establishing Parameters: Lebenskraft and Artifact,” which covers the period before 1800, Jennifer Wynne Hellwarth reviews the relationship between medical theories of pneuma and literary expressions of gender, sexuality, and romance, Ingo Uhlig explains the meaning of a natural historical cabinet in Halle, and Brian I. McInnis compares the teachings of two eighteenth-century physiologists. The next section, “Blood, Nerves, Resonance,” concentrating on the first half of the nineteenth century, includes an article in which James Kennaway recounts how German scholars drew connections between music and the mind. Also in this section, Alexis B. Smith traces the theories of the Romantic physicist Johannes Ritter in the writings of E. T. A. Hoffmann, Alice A. Kuzniar interprets homeopathy as a form of vitalism, and Ann C. Schmiesing discusses the Brothers Grimm’s obsession with blood. In the third part, “Fitness and Fitting In,” which runs through the 1920s, Nicholas Saul reveals a Gothic face to Max Nordau’s stories, Stephanie M. Hilger unpicks the tangle of genders in a memoir of Wilhemine intersexuality, and Cate I. Reilly delves into the Romantic roots of Alfred Döblin’s crime fiction. Finally, in a section that addresses contemporary concerns, “The Lebenskraft-Debate Recast: The Posthuman and Radical Mediation,” Heather I. Sullivan reads Goethe as anticipating the age of the Anthropocene, and Monica Ledoux offers an apology for homeopathic hospitals.The essays offer interesting readings of German culture. It would have helped, however, if the contributors had been a little less innocent of the research on their topics. The opening remarks of John McCarthy (one of the editors) on the case of the schizophrenic Daniel Paul Schreber cites a work from a psychoanalyst published in 1974 but fails to mention better-known studies by Elias Canetti, Zvi Lothane, and Eric Santer; similarly, his history of vitalism draws heavily from Alfred Noll’s “slim essay collection” (p. 28) of 1914 but overlooks later treatments by Georges Canguilhem, Charles Wolfe, and Adelheid Voskuhl. More troubling is the volume’s methodology. For all its advocacy of the virtues of wholeness, reciprocity, and embodiment, it generally avoids placing its topics in historical context. Instead, it describes the history of vitalism in terms of textual influence, with different versions of the idea recurring at regular intervals of time. In the right hands this approach is illuminating, as when Brian McInnis traces Blumenbach’s Bildungstrieb and Soemmering’s Lebenskraft to the Haller’s notions of irritability and sensibility (p. 111). Other times it stirs up a good deal of confusion, as when Alexis Smith compares Ritter and Hoffmann (parallel Romantics), their interests in synaesthesia (parallel senses), and Hoffmann’s various pseudonyms (parallel people; p. 152). Analyzing printed texts is fine for the purposes of establishing literary genealogies, but historians tend to worry about motive and reception, which is why they emphasize actors and their audiences—the human sides of cultural production. The Early History of Embodied Cognition unquestionably advances Romantic literary scholarship. It just might have advanced it further. Notes Gabriel Finkelstein’s biography of Emil du Bois-Reymond received an Honorable Mention at the PROSE Awards, was shortlisted for the John Pickstone Prize (awarded by the British Society for the History of Science to the best scholarly book in the history of science), and was named by the American Association for the Advancement of Science as one of the Best Books of 2014. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 108, Number 1March 2017 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/690695 © 2017 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Read full abstract