The key factor of an assessment is to minimize the errors by having a good reliability and validity of the assessment yardstick. To achieve high score in the test examinee must be aware about assessment cycle and use it in appropriate way in post exam analysis. Outcome of the results can be utilized as a constructive feedback in any given program. This cross-sectional study was conducted at department of Biochemistry, University of Rajarata. Multiple choice questions, structured essay type questions, objective structured practical examination, and continuous assessment was used in this study. Total number of students are 180 and was assessed for difficulty index, discrimination index, reliability, and standard error of measurement. In this study sample for analysis was used basically the examiner divides students into two groups (‘high’ and ‘low’) according to the score sheet of each student. Most of them are doing in a wrong way basically they divide high and low clusters as 25% each and considered upper quartile and lower quartile. In this study we compared it with the standard normal distribution curve where high and low groups are considered as 16% where is the standard. There is no significant difference among both clusters, and we recommend using the standard 16% as the high and low groups in post examination analysis. Keywords: difficulty index, post examination analysis, reliability of the examination, standard error of measurement
Read full abstract