ABSTRACT Bridging the research gap between reservoir operations and inundation risks under the future climate, this study integrates a hydrologic reservoir management model with a 2D hydrodynamic model, comparing the conventional regulations and the optimized reservoir operations based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Results reveal that optimized operations using the PSO algorithm consistently outperform conventional strategies by better-managing peak discharges and controlling downstream inundation. The study further differentiates between PSO-optimized plans: PSO1, which focuses on minimizing inundation areas, and PSO2, which prioritizes peak reduction at the flood control point. Interestingly, PSO2 proves superior for single-point peak reduction, typically the primary objective in current practices, whereas PSO1, despite lesser peak reduction, achieves a smaller inundation area, enhancing basin-scale flood resilience. This discrepancy reveals the need to consider downstream inundation risks as critical evaluation metrics in reservoir optimization, a factor often overlooked in existing studies. The research underscores the importance of updating operational frameworks to incorporate 2D inundation risks and adapt to increased flood risks under changing climate conditions. Despite optimization, future climate scenarios predict increased flood exposure, indicating that the current safety discharge rates and flow regulations at control points are outdated and require revision.