Early studies of strength fluctuations, using the cable tensiometer and dynamometric instrumentation for grip strength, show premenstrual and menstrual decreases in strength (Dawson, 1935). Although these studies were completed over 40 years ago, they apparently have not been replicated. Mood swings paralleling the menstrual cycle have been documented (Bardwick, 1971 ) , with the premenstrual and menstrual phases associated with negative moods, e.g., depression, irritability, but ability and achievement test performance swings have not been found (Golub, 1976). It is possible that fluctuation in grip strength, if it exists, may be more related to motivational factors than ability. Two groups of women college studencs volunteered. A motivated group (n = 12) were told that we believe observed changes In physical strength during the menstrual cycle are associated with motivational faaors we urge them to overcome; a control group (n = 10) were given standard instructions for grip strength. Subjects came in for testing four times during their menstrual cycles: premenstrually, menstrually, postmenstrually, and in midcycle. Menstrual phases were determined by self-report. For each woman a Lafayette Instrument Co. hand dynamometer (Model No. 78010) was adjusted to a comfortable grip size. Each subject, while standing with her arms at her side and the dynamometer in the self-reported dominant hand, was told to squeeze as hard as possible. Her score was the highest recorded on three consecutive trials. Mean performances during the four phases (premenstrual, menstrual, postmenstrual, and midcycle) were 35.3, 34.7, 33.2, and 34.8 for the motivated group and 34.5, 35.0, 34.2, and 35.0 for the uninformed group, with SDs of 7.1, 6.1, 6.8, 5.5 for the motivated group and 6.3, 5.3, 7.1, and 8.2 for the uninformed group, respectively. A two-way mixed-design analysis of variance (group x menstrual phase) was applied. There was no evidence for fluctuation in grip strength during the menstrual cycle among either group of subjects (P1.20 = .005 for group; P3.60 = 1.52 for phase). Dawson's original findings were not replicated. Since no physiological measures (such as basal body temperature) were obtained, a replication with more careful determination of menstrual phase would be highly desirable. REFERENCES
Read full abstract