Reviewed by: William Blake and the Age of Aquarius ed. by Stephen F. Eisenman Jade Hagan Keywords William Blake, Romanticism, American counterculture, 1960s', 1970's, art history, cultural studies, abstract expressionism, the Beat Generation, psychedelic subculture, utopianism, millenarianism, the Age of Aquarius, Maurice Sendak, occultism, esotericism stephen f. eisenman, ed. William Blake and the Age of Aquarius. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017. Pp. 248 + 137 color illustrations. Perhaps the most striking fact about the English poet and artist William Blake (1757–1827) is that until the middle of the twentieth century, almost no one had heard of him. Stephen Eisenman's edited collection William Blake and the Age of Aquarius makes significant headway toward recovering and revaluing the popular origins of Blake's current celebrity and mainstream status. In particular, it focuses on Blake's pivotal influence on the American counterculture [End Page 433] of the 1960s and '70s, which, as this collection convincingly demonstrates, was as much a visual culture as it was a political movement.1 The book forms the catalogue for the exhibition of the same name that ran from September 2017 to March 2018 at Northwestern University's Block Museum of Art, and features 137 high-resolution images of works in the exhibition.2 Together, the book and exhibition aim to explore the art and ideals of key figures in the 1960s through the lens of their engagement with Blake (vii). More specifically, the essays in the collection examine how Blake shaped the era's struggles against oppression and the various ways that he was understood and misunderstood in the process (viii). The collection is significant for its recovery of Blake's place in the visual culture of the 1960s and the ways in which Blake's imprint reshapes traditional categories of art history. Tracing Blake's influence on this culture brings together high and low art, placing psychedelic concert posters for The Doors and the formal experimentation of abstract expressionism on a continuum of responses to the same figure and the same political and cultural moment. This is fitting for a figure who himself bridged so many divides—between, for instance, text and image, marginal and mainstream, copyist and visionary. This collection grapples with three divides in particular: the past and present, politics and religion, and Blake's academic and popular reception. Although the authors have varying degrees of success in complicating these divides, the book's treatment of these issues expands our understanding of Blake and his proper historical location. The collection consists of a lengthy introductory chapter, a chapter on the historical contexts of Blake's work and life, four chapters that serve as case studies of Blake's influence on specific figures and coteries, and a final chapter that offers a methodological reflection on what it means to conduct the sort of trans-historical study laid out in the book and exhibition. Some of the [End Page 434] chapters offer a new interpretation, through the prism of Blake, of an artist or writer we thought we knew. But many of the artists and writers discussed in these pages will be new to most readers outside of the academic study of art history or postwar American cultural studies. Some of these figures will be new or surprising even to those who do study the 1960s. This is by design. In fact, one of the book's innovations is to suggest a new way of structuring or defining the counterculture vis-à-vis a new pantheon of countercultural figures. The chapters oscillate between panoramic overviews of Blake's impact on postwar American popular culture on the one hand and more focused studies of Blake's influence on specific movements and figures on the other. The four case studies narrow in focus as they progress, moving from Elizabeth Ferrell's chapter on a group of seven San Francisco-based writers and artists, to Jacob Henry Leveton's chapter on four abstract expressionists, to John Murphy's chapter on avant-garde artists Æthelred and Alexandra Eldridge, and finally to Mark Crosby's chapter on Maurice Sendak. At the same time, each of these four chapters speaks to a broader trend or cultural context of the '60s. The...
Read full abstract