<h3>Introduction</h3> Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine became ubiquitous. Telemedicine is defined as the use of information technology to provide the delivery of health care from a distance [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined it as critical to the delivery of health care services, including when distance is a limiting factor to obtain care [2], and there is evidence that telemedicine in a geriatric population is equivalent to in-person care [3]. Since COVID-19, HIPAA approved telemedicine platforms have provided a viable alternative to traditional face to face appointments. In particular, with the growing elderly population especially affected by the virus, there has been an increase in the use of telemedicine, which is a critical adaption for a geriatric population. For example, telemedicine removes barriers related to transportation (geriatric patients are more likely than general adult patients to rely on caregivers for transportation) and more easily facilitates caregiver reporting of collateral information (geriatric patients are more likely to have loved ones involved in their care and care decisions). Importantly, there has been a misconception that elderly patients would find the technology itself to be a barrier to care [4] – though in this new era of COVID-19, most patients, including geriatric patients, are now "Zoom" competent. Aims/Objectives: To examine the feasibility and potential sustainability of a geriatric telemedicine psychiatry practice, it is important to compare the rates of utilization before and after this surge in telemedicine in March 2020. This comparison is an important first step, as decreased rates of utilization subsequent to the ubiquity of telemedicine would be suggestive of systemic barriers to care (e.g., technology). If, on the other hand rates are comparable, then this would begin to shed light on telemedicine services sustaining beyond the pandemic. Therefore, we compare the number of clinical service encounters provided in a Geriatric Psychiatry Fellows' Clinic, specifically comparing the total number of visits in the year prior to the pandemic, and the total number of visits in the same timeframe that includes the onset of the pandemic. <h3>Methods</h3> The Emory productivity dashboard was utilized to determine the number of geriatric patients that arrived in the Geriatric psychiatry fellow's clinic in the academic periods before and during the pandemic for outpatient medication management and follow up visits. <h3>Results</h3> The geriatric clinic maintained a robust outpatient service. Review of the data showed that during the pre-pandemic months of February 2019 to January 2020, the number of patients that visited the geriatric psychiatry clinic in-person was 247. Consistently, during the pandemic year from February 2020 to January 2021, the number of patients that arrived in the same clinic and saw the same providers as the transition to telemedicine was in progress, was 297. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our geriatric service continued to deliver services via telemedicine during the pandemic despite the assumed challenges, particularly related to technology, among elderly patients. Future research can continue to examine rates of utilization into 2021 and 2022 and incorporate patient ratings of satisfaction, to continue to examine if the benefits of a geriatric telemedicine practice are at least equivalent, if not potentially superior to, traditional in-person medicine. <h3>This research was funded by</h3> There are no funding to report