Eye Lens Dose Research Articles

Impact of Simulation-Based Training on Radiation Exposure of Young Interventional Cardiologists

Reducing radiation exposure during cardiovascular catheterization is of paramount importance to ensure patient and staff safety. Our study aimed to assess the transferability of acquired skills from virtual reality to the real world, including radioprotection measures during mentored simulation training (ST) in coronary angiography. A total of 10 cardiology residents were evaluated during real-life cases in the catheterization laboratory before (group A) and after mentored ST. The educational effect of mentored simulator training on real-life case performance was evaluated at 2 different time points: within the first week (group B) and after 12 weeks (group C). Compared with group A, the total dose area product (DAP) (µGy•m2) and total air kerma (mGy) were lower after ST: group A: 2,633 (1,723 to 3,617) versus group B: 1,618 (1,032 to 2,562), p <0.05 and 214 (136 to 297) versus 135 (84 to 222), p <0.05, respectively. Concerning operator radiation exposure (µSv), left finger dose: 1,090 (820 to 1,460) versus 635 (300 to 900), p=0.028; left leg dose 80 (0 to 110) versus 0 (0 to 0), p=0.027; left eye lens dose: 39 (24 to 69) versus 11 (8 to 20), p <0.0001; and chest dose outside the lead apron: 50 (34 to 88) versus 29 (21 to 50), p <0.003 were significantly lower in the group B than group A. A total of 12 weeks after ST, the total DAP and total air kerma remained stable along with operator exposure except left eye lens dose (µSv): group B: 11 (8 to 20) versus group C: 16 (12 to 27), p=0.02. In addition, left eye lens dose, left wrist dose, and chest dose outside the lead apron were significantly correlated with total DAP (rs=0.635, rs=0.729, and rs=0, 629, respectively) and total air kerma (rs=0.488, rs=0.514, and rs=0.548, respectively) at 12 weeks. In conclusion, ST for coronary angiography may improve radioprotection learning and should be incorporated into training curricula.

DOSE MEASUREMENT PRECISION OF AN RPLD-BASED EYE LENS DOSEMETER APPLICABLE TO THE MEDICAL SECTOR.

We demonstrate a practical calibration method and its applicability for a commercially available radiophotoluminescence dosemeter (RPLD), i.e. the GD-352M (AGC Techno Glass, Shizuoka, Japan) to eye lens dose monitoring, by performing the calibration according to the ISO recommendations. The calibration was then verified through a series of experiments. For verification of the derived calibration factor (1.21 ± 0.04, k = 1) of the RPLD, we performed standard irradiations in the ISO narrow series X-ray reference fields and the simulation measurements in the actual radiation fields in a hospital. The TLD-based commercially available dosemeters, DOSIRIS™ was also put on the ISO cylinder phantom and the RANDO phantom together with the GD-352M in the verification experiments. The personal dose equivalents Hp(3) obtained from the GD-352M and those obtained from the DOSIRIS™ were in good agreement with each other. Our results demonstrate the proper calibration of a commercially available RPLD that is applicable to the additional monitoring of the lens of the eyes for medical staff.

Organ-based tube current modulation and bismuth eye shielding in pediatric head computed tomography.

Exposure of the eye lens to ionizing radiation results in cataract. Several dose optimization techniques to protect the lens are available for computed tomography (CT). The radiation dose to the eye lens, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and image quality of various methods of dose optimization were evaluated for pediatric head CT: automated tube current modulation (ATCM), automated tube voltage selection (ATVS), organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) and bismuth shielding. An anthropomorphic phantom of a 5-year-old child was scanned with nine protocols: no dose optimization technique and then adding different dose optimization techniques alone and in combination. Dose to the eye, thyroid and breast were estimated using metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimetry. CTDIvol, influence of timing of shield placement, image noise and attenuation values in 13 regions of interest of the head and subjective image quality were compared. The eye shield significantly reduced the eye lens dose when used alone, to a similar degree as when using all software-based techniques together. When used in combination with software-based techniques, the shield reduced the eye lens dose by up to 45% compared to the no dose optimization technique. Noise was significantly increased by the shield, most pronounced in the anterior portion of the eye. The combination of ATCM, ATVS, OBTCM and a bismuth shield, with the shield placed after acquiring the localizer image, should be considered to reduce the radiation dose to the eye lens in pediatric head CT.

MONITORING OF EYE LENS DOSE HP(3) CATHLAB STAFF USING SOCA DOSIMETER

MONITORING OF EYE LENS DOSE HP(3) CATHLAB STAFF USING SOCA DOSIMETER. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reduced the cataract threshold dose from 2‒5 Gy to 0.5 Gy, followed by a decrease in the dose limit value (NBD) of the radiation worker's eye lens to 20 mSv/year. Cathlab staff is one of the workers vulnerable to receiving high doses of eye lenses because they work near radiation sources, so staff's eye lens doses need to be monitored. Monitoring is carried out to analyze the dose of eye lenses received by workers and ensure workers are well protected. Eye lens measurement is carried out at Hp(3) or a depth of 3 mm because the lens is sensitive to radiation. Monitoring was carried out for one week on 14 staff (doctors, nurses, and radiographers) and four procedures with an eyepiece dosimeter (SOCA Dosimeter). The eye lens dose obtained for a week ranged from 0.108 – 1.642 mSv, and monitoring per procedure was 0.033 – 0.393 mSv. The annual dose received by workers is based on estimates mostly exceeding the NBD, so tracking with an eye lens dosimeter needs to be done, and eye protection equipment needs to be used to reduce the eye lens dose received. Keywords: Cathlab staff, eye lens dose Hp(3), SOCA dosimeter

Efficiency evaluation of leaded glasses and visors for eye lens dose reduction during fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures

PurposeFluoroscopy guided interventional procedures guarantee high benefits for patients, but are associated with high levels of radiation exposure for the medical staff. Their increasing use and complexity results in even higher radiation exposures, with a risk to exceed the annual dose limit of 20 mSv for the eye lens. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential dose reduction of eye lens exposure for lead glasses and for two types of visors (half and full), used by physicians performing interventional procedures. MethodsEye lens dose measurements were carried out on an anthropomorphic phantom simulating a physician performing a fluoroscopy guided interventional procedure. Dose reduction factors were calculated using high sensitivity thermoluminescent dosimeters. Moreover, a spatial dose distribution was generated for the two visors. ResultsThe dose reduction coefficient was found to be 1.6 for the glasses, 1.2 for the half visor and 4.5 for the full visor. ConclusionsOptimal radiation protection requires a combination of different radiation protection equipment. Full visors that cover all the face of the operator are recommended, as they absorb scattered radiation reaching the eyes from all directions. Full visors should be prioritized over radiation protection glasses for cases where other protective equipment such as ceiling shielding cannot be used.

Dosimetry of Occupational Eye Lens Dose Using a Novel Direct Eye Dosimeter, DOSIRIS, during Interventional Radiology Procedures.

In response to the recommendation by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to lower the equivalent eye dose limit, the Japanese Government in April 2021 lowered the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens for occupational exposure. A considerable number of interventional radiology operators are exposed to levels above the new limit. For this reason, a need exists to more accurately evaluate eye lens dose in interventional radiology operators by using a novel direct eye dosimeter, the DOSIRIS™(IRSN, France), which is capable of measuring a 3-mm dose equivalent under protective glasses. The DOSIRIS is a thermoluminescent dosimeter that exhibits good energy dependence and better directional properties than other dosimeters. Dosimetry using DOSIRIS might be accurate and compatible with the latest regulations.

Determination of a reliable assessment for occupational eye lens dose in nuclear medicine.

The most recent statement published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection describes a reduction in the maximum allowable occupational eye lens dose from 150 to 20 mSv/year (averaged over 5‐year periods). Exposing the eye lens to radiation is a concern for nuclear medicine staff who handle radionuclide tracers with various levels of photon energy. This study aimed to define the optimal dosimeter and means of measuring the amount of exposure to which the eye lens is exposed during a routine nuclear medicine practice. A RANDO human phantom attached to Glass Badge and Luminess Badge for body or neck, DOSIRIS and VISION for eyes, and nanoDot for body, neck, and eyes was exposed to 99mTc, 123I, and 18F radionuclides. Sealed syringe sources of each radionuclide were positioned 30 cm from the abdomen of the phantom. Estimated exposure based on measurement conditions (i.e., air kerma rate constants, conversion coefficient, distance, activity, and exposure time) was compared measured dose equivalent of each dosimeter. Differences in body, neck, and eye lens dosimeters were statistically analyzed. The 10‐mm dose equivalent significantly differed between the Glass Badge and Luminess Badge for the neck, but these were almost equivalent at the body. The 0.07‐mm dose equivalent for the nanoDot dosimeters was greatly overestimated compared to the estimated exposure of 99mTc and 123I radionuclides. Measured dose equivalents of exposure significantly differed between the body and eye lens dosimeters with respect to 18F. Although accurately measuring radiation exposure to the eye lenses of nuclear medicine staff is conventionally monitored using dosimeters worn on the chest or abdomen, eye lens dosimeters that provide a 3‐mm dose equivalent near the eye would be a more reliable means of assessing radiation doses in the mixed radiation environment of nuclear medicine.

Protected and Unprotected Radiation Exposure to the Eye Lens During Endovascular Procedures in Hybrid Operating Rooms

Radiation cataract has been observed at lower doses than previously thought, therefore the annual limit for equivalent dose to the eye lens has been reduced from 150 to 20 mSv. This study evaluated radiation exposure to the eye lens of operators working in a hybrid operating room before and after implementation of a dose reduction program. From April to October 2019, radiation exposure to the first operator was measured during all consecutive endovascular procedures performed in the hybrid operating room using BeOSL Hp(3) eye lens dosimeters placed both outside and behind the lead glasses (0.75 mm lead equivalent). Measured values were compared with data from a historic control group from the same hospital before implementation of the dose reduction program. A total of 181 consecutive patients underwent an endovascular procedure in the hybrid operating room. The median unprotected eye lens dose (outside lead glasses) of the main operator was 0.049 mSv for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) (n= 30), 0.042 mSv for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n= 23), 0.175 mSv for complex aortic fenestrated or branched endovascular procedures (F/BEVAR; n= 15), and 0.042 mSv for peripheral interventions (n= 80). Compared with the control period, EVAR had 75% lower, TEVAR 79% lower, and F/BEVAR 55% lower radiation exposure to the unprotected eye lens of the first operator. The lead glasses led to a median reduction in the exposure to the eye lens by a factor of 3.4. The implementation of a dose reduction program led to a relevant reduction in radiation exposure to the head and eye lens of the first operator in endovascular procedures. With optimum radiation protection measures, including a ceiling mounted shield and lead glasses, more than 440 EVARs, 280 TEVARs, or 128 FEVARs could be performed per year before the dose limit for the eye lens of 20 mSv was reached.

Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Eye Lens Dosimetry for Interventional Radiology Workers in China during 2017-2019.

The eye lens is a sensitive tissue to ionizing radiation and recently has been recognized as more radiosensitive than previously considered. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has recommended a considerable reduction in the equivalent dose limit of eye lens from 150 mSv y -1 to 20 mSv y -1 , averaged over a defined period of 5 y. In this paper, the eye lens dose of interventional radiology workers in China during 2017-2019 is analyzed to understand the current status of eye lens occupational exposure and to provide decision-making suggestions for health supervision departments using data obtained from the National Radiological Health Information Platform in China. A total of 3,026 eye lens dose records of interventional radiology workers were collected. The average annual eye lens dose (AAELD) for interventional radiology workers ranged from 1.07 to 1.51 mSv during 2017-2019 and was 1.44 mSv for all monitored interventional radiology workers, with 2,973 records (98.2%) lower than the public limit of 15 mSv and 33 records (1.1%) exceeding the newly revised occupational eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv y -1 . During the period of 2017-2019, the AAELDs of interventional radiologists (1.61 mSv) and of interventional cardiologists (1.59 mSv) were significantly higher than that of other interventional workers (0.62 mSv); the AAELD of doctors (1.50 mSv) was significantly higher than that of nurses (1.01 mSv); the AAELD of western China (2.00 mSv) was significantly higher than that of eastern (1.11 mSv) and central China (1.27 mSv); and the AAELD of males (1.59 mSv) was significantly higher than that of females (0.84 mSv). The eye lens dose of interventional radiology workers meets the Chinese standard limit of 150 mSv y -1 , while some cases exceed the one recommended by ICRP. The study shows that the interventional radiology workers' eye lens dosimetry data complied with the existing Chinese eye lens dose limits. However, education, training, and supervision of radiation protection also should be strengthened continuously for interventional radiology workers, especially for the interventional radiologists and interventional cardiologists. Significant attention should be paid to the radiation protection of underdeveloped regions in China in future works.

The eye lens dose of the interventionalist: Measurement in practice

ObjectiveEarly 2018, the new eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv per year for occupational exposure to ionising radiation was implemented in the European Union. Dutch guidelines state that monitoring is compulsory above an expected eye lens dose of 15 mSv/year. In this study we propose a method to investigate whether the eye lens dose of interventionalists would exceed 15 mSv/year and to determine if the eye lens dose can be derived from the regular personal dosimeter measurements. MethodsThe eye lens dose, Hp(3), of interventional radiologists (n = 2), cardiologists (n = 2) and vascular surgeons (n = 3) in the Máxima Medical Centre, The Netherlands, was measured during six months, using thermoluminescence dosimeters on the forehead. Simultaneously, the surface dose, Hp(0,07), and whole body dose, Hp(10), were measured using regular dosimeters outside the lead skirt at chest level. The dosimeters were simultaneously refreshed every four weeks. The eye lens dose was compared to both the body-worn dosimeter values. Measurements were performed in the angiography suite, Cath lab and hybrid OR. ResultsA clear relation was observed between the two dosimeters: Hp(3) ≈ 0,25 Hp(0,07). The extrapolated year dose for the eye lens did not exceed 15 mSv for any of the interventionalists (average 3 to 10 studies/month). ConclusionsThe eye lens dose can be monitored indirectly through the regular dosimeter at chest level. Additionally, based on the measurements we conclude that all monitored interventionalists remain below the dose limit and compulsory monitoring limit for the eye lens dose.

Ratios of Eye Lens and Hand Equivalent Doses with Whole-Body Effective Doses for Operators Performing Interventional Radiological Procedures.

Estimating radiation doses for operators performing interventional radiological procedures is crucial in the occupational radiation protection of medical staff. In this study, Monte Carlo simulations coupled with an anthropomorphic phantom were used to model various exposure scenarios during the procedures. Conversion coefficients of the dose-area product of x rays for the eye lens equivalent dose, hand equivalent dose, and whole-body effective dose of the operator were calculated. Accordingly, the relationships between these dose quantities in typical interventional configurations were established, considering various source locations, tube voltages, and use of protective equipment or not. The results are presented in a systematic way for easy comparison and use. Tables and figures of the data can be helpful to provide estimates of eye lens and hand equivalent doses when records of specific dosimeters are absent, such as in the retrospective assessment of operators' eye lens and hand equivalent doses in past practices.

Occupational radiation dose and protection to the eye lens for interventional cardiology operators

ObjectivesInterventional professionals tend to receive extended radiation exposure given the complexity and machine settings of procedures in interventional cardiology departments, resulting in a high eye lens dose. This study developed a method for estimating the occupational radiation dose to the eye lens based on the personal dose equivalent to the skin at 0.07-mm depth [Hp(0.07)] obtained using an over-apron dose badge, investigated whether glasses with lateral shielding but a thin Pb-equivalent material could adequately protect the eye lens from radiation in clinical situations, and identified factors affecting the occupational radiation dose to the eye lens. MethodsThe occupational radiation dose was prospectively measured using dosimeters near the eye and over the lead apron at the collar level in 26 interventional professionals performing 444 procedures in interventional cardiology departments. Type A (0.07-mm front and lateral Pb equivalence) and type B (0.5-mm front Pb equivalence and 0.25-mm lateral Pb equivalence) glasses were worn by the operators during operation to protect the eye lens. ResultsThe median personal dose equivalent to the eye lens at 3-mm depth [Hp(3)/dose area product (DAP)] of the primary operator was the highest (7.6 μSv/Gycm2) for upper limb percutaneous transluminal angioplasty among all examined procedures. The secondary operator's median Hp(3)/DAP values ranged from 17% to 41% of that of the primary operator. The median Hp(3)/DAP values did not significantly differ between the primary operators wearing type A glasses and those wearing type B glasses for percutaneous coronary intervention or diagnostic cardiology studies (all p > 0.05). The Pearson correlation test results revealed significant positive correlations between the Hp(3) and Hp(0.07). The estimated annual Hp(3) values ranged from 3.3 ± 0.6 to 62.4 ± 8.3 mSv and from 6.0 to 8.0 ± 4.6 mSv for the cardiologists and radiographers, respectively. ConclusionsThe Hp(3) value can be estimated from the Hp(0.07) value obtained using an over-apron dose badge at the collar level. Glasses with 0.07-mm front and lateral Pb equivalence provide satisfactory radiation protection to the eye lens. Regularly using appropriate radiation-protective lead glasses, adopting small angles for left anterior oblique projections, and undertaking moderate workloads are highly recommended to prevent cardiologists from receiving excessive radiation doses to the eye lens.

Staff eye lens dose in interventional radiology and cardiology in Finland

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the eye lens and whole-body radiation doses to interventional radiology and cardiology staff in two Finnish hospitals. MethodsSimultaneous measurements of personal dose equivalent quantities Hp(3) and Hp(10) were conducted in clinical conditions during different radiological and cardiological interventional procedures. In order to study the feasibility to estimate eye lens dose with Hp(10) measured over the protective apron or thyroid shield, the ratio between measured Hp(3) and Hp(10) was investigated. Results and conclusionsApplying the obtained ratio on Hp(10) records from national dose register showed that only a small number of interventional radiologists and cardiologists in Finland may exceed eye lens equivalent dose levels of 20 mSv per year or 100 mSv in five consecutive years, but likely do not exceed 50 mSv in a single year. For the most Finnish interventionalists, the eye lens dose is well below 10 mSv per year. Nurses and radiographers assisting in interventions are, on average, less exposed than interventionalists, and will not exceed 20 mSv per year. Based on our results, Hp(10) measured over the protective apron or thyroid shield provides a conservative estimate of the eye lens dose for interventional radiologists and cardiologists, provided that appropriate protective glasses are used.

Radiation exposure of the eye lens in orthopedics and trauma surgery : Apilot study

On 27 June 2017 the Act on new regulation of the law for the protection against the harmful effects of ionizing radiation was passed. One of the main innovations in daily surgical practice in the now legally stipulated provisions is the lowering of the eye lens dose to 20 mSv/year (§§78, 212 Radiation Protection Act, StrlSchG). To estimate the level of exposure of the eye lens to ionizing radiation that is to be expected in the course of surgical interventions, the dose that surgeons receive during surgery was determined. For this, the radiation exposure adjacent to the eye lens was measured using aforehead dosimeter while performing surgical interventions over aperiod of 8weeks in 2 different operating rooms. As aresult, amean estimated eye lens radiation dose Hp (3) of 190 µSv could be determined during the 2‑month study period. Thus, the estimated cumulative radiation dose in 1 year of approximately 1.2 mSv was significantly below the threshold of 20 mSv/year. By complying with the common radiation protection measures in the context of operative interventions in orthopedics and trauma surgery, the legal limit value of 20 mSv/year is generally not expected to be exceeded.

Real-time Detection of Patient Head Position and Cephalometric Landmarks from Neuro-Interventional Procedure Images Using Machine Learning for Patient Eye-Lens Dose Prediction.

A deep learning (DL) model has been developed to estimate patient-lens dose in real-time for given exposure and geometric conditions during fluoroscopically-guided neuro-interventional procedures. Parameters input into the DL model for dose prediction include the patient head shift from isocenter and cephalometric landmark locations as a surrogate for head size. Machine learning (ML) models were investigated to automatically detect these parameters from the in-procedure fluoroscopic image. Fluoroscopic images of a Kyoto Kagaku anthropomorphic head phantom were taken at various known X (transverse) and Y (longitudinal) shifts, as well as different magnification modes, to create an image database. For each image, anatomical landmark coordinate locations were obtained manually using ImageJ and are used as ground-truth labels for training. This database was then used to train the two separate ML models. One ML model predicts the patient head shift in both the X and Y directions and the other model predicts the coordinates of the anatomical landmarks. From the coordinates, the distance between these anatomical landmarks is calculated, and input into the DL dose-prediction model. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for the head-shift and landmark-coordinate models, respectively. The goal is to implement these two separate models into the Dose Tracking System (DTS) developed by our group. This would allow the DTS to automatically detect the patient head size and position for eye-lens dose prediction and eliminate the need for manual input by the clinical staff.

Experimental Evaluation of Scattered X-Ray Spectra due to X-Ray Therapeutic and Diagnosis Equipment for Eye Lens Dosimetry of Medical Staff

Background: For proper monitoring of the eye lens dose, an appropriate calibration factor of a dosimeter and information about the mean energies of X-rays are indispensable. The scattered X-ray energy spectra should be well characterized in medical practices where eye lenses of medical staffs might be high.Materials and Methods: Scattered X-ray energy spectra were experimentally derived for three different types of X-ray diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, i.e., the computed tomography (CT) scan, the angiography and the fluoroscopy. A commercially available CdZnTe (CZT) spectrometer with a lead collimator was employed for the measurement of scattered X-rays, which was performed in the usual manner.Results and Discussion: From the obtained energy spectra, the mean energies of the scattered X-rays lied between 40 and 60 keV. This also agreed with that obtained by the conventional half value layer method.Conclusion: The scattered X-rays to which medical workers may be exposed in the region around the eyes were characterized by means of spectrometry. The obtained mean energies of the scattered X-rays were found to match the flat region of the dosimeter response.

Occupational exposure to physicians working with a Zero-Gravity\u2122 protection system in haemodynamic and electrophysiology labs and the assessment of its performance against a standard ceiling suspended shield

A two centre clinical study was performed to analyse exposure levels of cardiac physicians performing electrophysiology and haemodynamic procedures with the use of state of the art Zero-Gravity™ radiation protective system (ZG). The effectiveness of ZG was compared against the commonly used ceiling suspended lead shield (CSS) in a haemodynamic lab. The operator’s exposure was assessed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) during both ablation (radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRYA)) and angiography and angioplasty procedures (CA/PCI). The dosimeters were placed in multiple body regions: near the left eye, on the left side of the neck, waist and chest, on both hands and ankles during each measurement performed with the use of ZG. In total 29 measurements were performed during 105 procedures. To compare the effectiveness of ZG against CSS an extra 80 measurements were performed with the standard lead apron, thyroid collar and ceiling suspended lead shield during CA/PCI procedures. For ZG, the upper values for the average eye lens and whole body doses per procedure were 4 µSv and 16 µSv for the left eye lens in electrophysiology lab (with additionally used CSS) and haemodynamic lab (without CSS), respectively, and about 10 µSv for the remaining body parts (neck, chest and waist) in both labs. The skin doses to hands and ankles non-protected by the ZG were 5 µSv for the most exposed left finger and left ankle in electrophysiology lab, while in haemodynamic lab 150 µSv and 17 µSv, respectively. The ZG performance was 3 times (p < 0.05) and at least 15 times (p < 0.05) higher for the eye lenses and thoracic region, respectively, compared to CSS (with dosimeters on the apron/collar). However, when only ZG was used slightly higher normalised doses were observed for the left finger compared to CSS (5.88e − 2 Sv/Gym2 vs. 4.31 e − 2 Sv/Gym2, p = 0.016). The study results indicate that ZG performance is superior to CSS. It can be simultaneously used with the ceiling suspended lead shield to ensure the protection to the hands as long as this is not obstructive for the work.

Uncertainties in occupational eye lens doses from dosimeters over the apron in interventional practices

It is relevant to estimate the uncertainties in the measurement of eye lens doses from a personal dosimeter over the protective apron without using additional dosimetry near the eyes. Additional dosimetry for interventionists represents a difficulty for routine clinical practice. This study analyses the estimated eye doses from dosimeter values taken at chest level over the apron and their uncertainties. Measurements of H p(0.07) using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters located on the chest over the apron and on the glasses (in the inner and outer part of the protection) were taken from ten interventionalists in a university hospital, in the period 2018–2019 during standard clinical practice. For a total sample of 133 interventional procedures included in our study, the ratio between the H p(0.07) on the glasses (left-outer side) and on the chest over the apron had an average of 0.74, with quartiles of 0.47, 0.64, 0.88. Statistically significant differences were found among operators using the U-Mann–Whitney test. The average transmission factor for the glasses was 0.30, with quartiles of 0.21, 0.25, and 0.32. Different complexity in the procedures, in the quality of the scatter radiation and in the individual operational practices, involve a relevant dispersion in the results for lens dose estimations from the over apron dosimeter. Lens doses may be between a 64% and an 88% of the over apron dosimeter values (using median or 3rd quartile). The use of 88% may be a conservative approach.

Radiation Eye Dose for Physicians in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Biopsy.

It is important to evaluate the radiation eye dose (3 mm dose equivalent, Hp (3)) received by physicians during computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided biopsy, as physicians are close to the source of scattered radiation. In this study, we measured the radiation eye dose in Hp (3) received by one physician during CTF in a timeframe of 18 months using a direct eye dosimeter, the DOSIRISTM. The physician placed eye dosimeters above and under their lead (Pb) eyeglasses. We recorded the occupational radiation dose received using a neck dosimeter, gathered CT dose-related parameters (e.g., CT-fluoroscopic acquisition number, CT-fluoroscopic time, and CT-fluoroscopic mAs), and performed a total of 95 procedures during CTF-guided biopsies. We also estimated the eye dose (Hp (3)) received using neck personal dosimeters and CT dose-related parameters. The physician eye doses (right and left side) received in terms of Hp (3) without the use of Pb eyeglasses for 18 months were 2.25 and 2.06 mSv, respectively. The protective effect of the Pb eyeglasses (0.5 mm Pb) on the right and left sides during CTF procedures was 27.8 and 37.5%, respectively. This study proved the existence of significant correlations between the eye and neck dose measurement (right and left sides, R2 = 0.82 and R2 = 0.55, respectively) in physicians. In addition, we found significant correlations between CT-related parameters, such as CT-fluoroscopy mAs, and radiation eye doses (right and left sides, R2 = 0.50 and R2 = 0.52, respectively). The eye dose of Hp (3) received in CTF was underestimated when evaluated using neck dosimeters. Therefore, we suggest that the physician involved in CTF use a direct eye dosimeter such as the DOSIRIS for the accurate evaluation of their eye lens dose.

Current status of eye-lens dosimetry in Canada

For occupational exposures in planned exposure situations International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 118 recommends an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv yr−1 averaged over five years with no single year exceeding 50 mSv. This constitutes a reduction from the previous limit of 150 mSv yr−1. The Canadian nuclear regulator, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, responded to the ICRP recommendation by initiating amendments to the Radiation Protection Regulations through a discussion paper which was published for comment by interested stakeholders in 2013. The revised equivalent dose limit of 50 mSv in a one-year dosimetry period for nuclear energy workers came into effect in January 2021. This paper presents the outcome of discussions with Canadian stakeholders in diverse fields of radiological work which focused on the implementation of the reduced occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye in their respective workplaces. These exchanges highlighted the existing practices for monitoring doses to the lens of the eye and identified current technological gaps. The exchanges also identified that, in many cases, the lens of the eye dose is anticipated to be well within the new dose limit despite some of the gaps in technology. The paper also presents the monitoring and eye-lens dose assessment solutions that are available based on different methods for eye-lens monitoring; presented together with criteria for their use.