This study examines the feasibility of quantifying net fluxes across a macrotidal estuary employing a range of available instrumentation. The observational programme in the Mersey Estuary used the following array of instruments to measure tidal currents: bottom mounted and towed ADCPs (acoustic Doppler current profiler); bottom and (floating) platform- mounted electromagnetic current meters; and moored rotary meters. In 1992, observations extending over a 15-day spring-neap tidal cycle included near-continuous half-hourly towed ADCP transects across the 1·5km wide Mersey Narrows. The ADCPs also recorded acoustic backscatter, used here to indicate concentrations of suspended particulate matter (SPM).Tidal analyses of data of this type are complicated by the effect of the change in cross-sectional area between low and high waters. Here, an appropriate vertical reference frame is suggested that optimizes the tidal analyses (especially where drying occurs) and allows both the comparison of moored and floating instruments, and subsequent synthesis into cross-sectionally integrated parameters. Formulation of a related cross-sectional grid scheme for analyses of the towed ADCP data is also described.After careful adoption of the above frameworks, coherent horizontal and vertical distributions were identified from analyses of the towed ADCP data for amplitude, phase and direction of N2, M2, S2, M4, MSf and Z0tidal ellipses. Encouraging comparisons were found between tidal current constituents derived from the various instrument arrays. Similarly, coherent cross-sectional distributions for both tidal and residual fluxes of water and SPM were obtained.Residual current time series recorded at fixed positions showed good cross-correlation, but limited correlation against local wind data. By contrast, the residual time series for the principal mode representing the towed ADCP current data was uncorrelated with these fixed position data. It is possible that extraneous noise inherent in the towed instruments is not effectively filtered in the tidal analysis, and contaminates the residual current time series. Although the spatial distributions of the various estimates of Z0for the net water flux are coherent, the values (mean over 15 days) are clearly unrepresentative. Thus, despite the scale of the observational programme, it is concluded that where net fluxes are less than a few percent of tidal oscillations, these can not be determined by direct measurements of the sort described, even with state-of-the-art instrumentation. This conclusion essentially confirms experience elsewhere. Alternative methods of determining net fluxes include interpretation of measurements (of the present cross-sectional kind) with the aid of numerical models, or for ‘conservative’ riverine tracers, calculation from longitudinal profiles.
Read full abstract