The interplay between aliovalent CuO doping and nonstoichiometry on the development of defect structures and the formation of secondary phases of antiferroelectric NaNbO${}_{3}$ ceramics has been investigated by means of x-ray diffraction (XRD), first-principles calculations using density functional theory (DFT), and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. The results indicate that, for stoichiometric 0.25 mol% CuO-doped NaNbO${}_{3}$, as well as for 2.0 mol% Nb-excess sodium niobate, the Cu${}^{2+}$ functional centers are incorporated at the Nb site (${\mathrm{Cu}}_{\mathrm{Nb}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}$). For reasons of charge compensation, two kinds of mutually compensating defect complexes ${({\mathrm{Cu}}_{\mathrm{Nb}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}{V}_{\mathrm{O}}^{\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}})}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and ${({V}_{\mathrm{O}}^{\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{\mathrm{Nb}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}{V}_{\mathrm{O}}^{\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}})}^{\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}}$ are formed where, for the niobium-excess compound, additionally, ${V}_{\mathrm{Na}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ contribute to the mechanism of charge compensation. In contrast, for 2.0 mol% Na-excess sodium niobate, a Na${}_{3}$NbO${}_{4}$ secondary phase has been detected by XRD, and only part of the Cu${}^{2+}$ forms these types of defect complexes. The major part of the Cu${}^{2+}$ is incorporated in a fundamentally different way by forming Cu${}^{2+}$-Cu${}^{2+}$ dimeric defect complexes.
Read full abstract