Efficacy Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Locoregional treatment improves overall survival for liver cancer during second-line regorafenib or immune checkpoint inhibitor.

For advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the best second-line treatment after first-line treatment with sorafenib is unclear. This study aimed to compared the efficacy of second-line regorafenib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced HCC after sorafenib therapy. This retrospective study included 89 patients with HCC treated with sorafenib, and then regorafenib (n = 58) or an ICI (n = 31). Treatment response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the 2 groups were compared, and factors associated with post-treatment mortality or disease progression were evaluated. During follow-up period, compared to regorafenib, treatment with an ICI results in a slight increase in a 20% decrease of AFP (35.7% vs. 31.8%), complete response rate (6.5% vs. 0%), objective response rate (16.1% vs. 6.9%), median overall survival (13.3 vs. 5 months), and median PFS (3.0 vs. 2.6 months). Combined locoregional treatment (LRT) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.99) during second-line treatment was associated with a decreased risk of post-treatment mortality. After propensity scoring matching, combined LRT during second-line treatment had longer post-treatment OS than patients without combined LRT. A 20% decrease of AFP (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.94) was associated with a decreased risk of post-treatment disease progression. In conclusions, second-line treatment with regorafenib or ICI prolongs OS in patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib. Combined LRT during second-line treatment is associated with decreased post-treatment mortality. A 20% decrease of AFP level may be predictive of a lower rate of disease progression.

Exploring the impact of non-small cell lung cancer tumor microbiome on the efficacy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Exploring the impact of non-small cell lung cancer tumor microbiome on the efficacy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer: therapeutic advances and questions.

The microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype is related to a deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system and is observed in 5% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). MSI/dMMR phenotype testing should be routine for all CRCs regardless of stage. Two complementary techniques with a high concordance (90-97%) allow us to determine the MSI/dMMR status of a tumor: immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction. Since 2020 and the results of the phase III KEYNOTE 177 trial, pembrolizumab [anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)] is the new standard of care in first-line MSI/dMMR mCRC. To date, no combination of chemtotherapy ± targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been validated in the management of MSI/dMMR mCRC, and it is not known whether this combination would be beneficial. It is also unclear whether dual therapy with two ICIs is more effective than monotherapy. Several phase III trials are ongoing to answer these questions. Despite a high response rate and long-term benefit of a first line by anti-PD1, 30-50% of patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC experience an early or secondary progression. There are currently no validated predictive biomarkers of anti-PD1 ± anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 resistance in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC. In case of early progression on ICIs, the first two questions to consider are the possibility of pseudoprogression and the correct diagnosis of MSI/dMMR status. To date, there are no data on the use of adjuvant ICIs for MSI/dMMR resected colon cancers. By contrast, data are accumulating regarding the efficacy of neoadjuvant ICIs, with at least two-thirds of patients in the different trials in pathological complete response, making it possible to envisage 'Watch and wait' strategies in future.

PEDF-Enriched Extracellular Vesicle for Vessel Normalization to Potentiate Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy

The abnormal tumor vasculature acts as the physical and functional barrier to the infiltration and activity of effector T cells, leading to the low response rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Herein, antiangiogenic extracellular vesicles that enable normalization of the tumor-associated vasculature were prepared to potentiate the efficacy of ICIs. Small extracellular vesicles were exploited as the delivery platform to protect the antiangiogenic protein, pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), from proteolytic degradation. Along with the physicochemical characteristics of the PEDF-enriched extracellular vesicles (P-EVs), their inhibitory effects on migration, proliferation, and tube formation of endothelial cells were investigated in vitro. In tumor-bearing mice, it was confirmed that, compared to bare PEDFs, P-EVs efficiently reduced vessel leakiness, improved blood perfusion, and attenuated hypoxia. Consequently, when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies, P-EVs remarkably augmented the antitumor immunity, as evidenced by increased infiltration of CD8 + T cells and reduced regulatory T cells. These results suggest that P-EVs are promising therapeutics for tumors refractory to ICIs.

Chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors may overcome the detrimental effect of high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio prior to treatment in esophageal cancer patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a promising treatment option for esophageal cancer (EC). Although ICIs enable long-term survival in some patients, the efficacy of ICIs varies widely among patients. Therefore, predictive biomarkers are necessary for identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from ICIs to improve the efficacy of the treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of combination therapy, including nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy plus anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies in our institute to identify biomarkers. Twenty-seven patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and thirty-six patients received chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibodies were included in this study. We analyzed patient characteristics, efficacy, and safety. Multivariable analysis of biomarkers evaluated the correlation among overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the following variables: body mass index, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein level, and albumin level before treatment. In multivariable analysis, albumin level was significantly correlated with PFS in the cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) plus pembrolizumab group. NLR and albumin level were significantly correlated with OS in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. Other variables, including PS, BMI, and CRP did not correlate with any of the outcomes. High NLR in EC patients prior to treatment was significantly less effective for ICIs. In chemotherapy combined with ICIs, NLR before the treatment was not associated with treatment efficacy, suggesting combination chemotherapy may be beneficial for EC patients with high NLR. NLR may be an indicator of immunocompetence in anti-tumor immunity and a convenient predictive biomarker for selecting appropriate treatments including ICIs.

Immunosenescence and immunotherapy in older NSCLC patients.

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predominantly affects the elderly since its incidence and mortality rates skyrocket beyond the age of 65. The landscape of NSCLC treatment has been revolutionized by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have emerged after a long and mostly inactive period of conventional treatment protocols. However, there is limited data on the exact effects of these chemicals on older patients, whose care can be complicated by a variety of conditions. This highlights the need to understand the efficacy of emerging cancer medicines in older patients. In this study, we will review the data of ICIs from clinical trials that were relevant to older people with NSCLC and poor performance status. We will also discuss the role of immunosenescence in immunotherapy and biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Germline DNA damage response gene mutations as predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.

Impaired DNA damage response (DDR) can affect immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) efficacy and lead to heightened immune activation. We assessed the impact of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline DDR mutations on ICI response and toxicity. A retrospective analysis of 131 cancer patients with germline DNA testing and ICI treatment was performed. Ninety-two patients were DDR-negative (DDR-), and 39 had ≥1 DDR mutation (DDR+). DDR+ patients showed higher objective response rates (ORRs) compared to DDR- in univariate and multivariable analyses, adjusting for age and metastatic disease (62% vs. 23%, unadjusted OR = 5.41; 95% CI, 2.41-12.14; adjusted OR 5.94; 95% CI, 2.35-15.06). Similar results were seen in mismatch repair (MMR), DDR pathways with intact MMR (DDR+MMRi), and homologous recombination (HR) subgroups versus DDR- (adjusted OR MMR = 24.52; 95% CI 2.72-221.38, DDR+MMRi = 4.26; 95% CI, 1.57-11.59, HR = 4.74; 95% CI, 1.49-15.11). DDR+ patients also had higher ORRs with concurrent chemotherapy (82% vs. 39% DDR-, p=0.03) or concurrent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (50% vs. 5% DDR-, p=0.03). No significant differences in immune-related adverse events were observed between DDR+ and DDR- cohorts. P/LP germline DDR mutations may enhance ICI response without significant additional toxicity.

Immunophenotypes and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Macrotrabecular Massive and Vessels Encapsulating Tumor Clusters.

Recently, vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) pattern and macrotrabecular massive (MTM) pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been reported as aggressive histological types. These histological patterns showed an immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Since there have been no reports on the differences of these two subtypes simultaneously, this study examined the immunophenotypes and TIME of MTM-HCC and VETC-HCC immunohistochemically. Seventy-four cases of previously diagnosed HCC, including 32 MTM-HCCs, 21 VETC-HCCs, and 21 conventional HCCs, were enrolled in immunohistochemical analysis. We conducted immunohistochemical analysis. We found that MTM-HCC showed less frequent expression of HepPar-1, which is one of the most common hepatocytic markers. In MTM-HCC, the frequency of high expression levels of Keratin19, carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX, and PD-L1 was higher compared to VETC-HCC and conventional HCC. PD-L1 expression was found in 34.4% of MTM-HCC, 0% of VETC-HCC, and 19.0% of conventional HCC. The rate of PD-L1 expression in MTM-HCC was significantly higher than the others (p=0.0015). PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with epithelial cell adhesion molecules and CA IX expression, which are representative markers of tumor stemness and hypoxic conditions, respectively. The CD8 infiltration in VETC-HCC was significantly lower than that in conventional HCC. MTM-HCC had different immunophenotypes and TIMEs compared to HCC with the VETC pattern. Although both had immunosuppressive TIME, the elements forming TIME were quite different. To enhance the immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy, changing TIME from a suppressive to an active form is essential.

Impact of Antibiotics on the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Impact of Antibiotics on the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Assessment of the clinical effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: A systematic review

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant primary brain tumor which is commonly found in humans. Conventional therapeutic approaches for GBM offer only a short median overall survival (MOS), thereby accentuating its poor clinical outcome. Despite the promising potential shown by use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in animal models to treat GBM, human trials result remains inconclusive. This systematic review evaluated the safety and clinical efficacy of ICIs in GBM patients. A literature search from Embase and MEDLINE (Ovid) was completed in October 2023. A total of 10 suitable articles, which encompass 168 patients (164 recurrent and 4 newly-diagnosed GBM), are taken into account. 3 studies assessed the OS, 7 studies assessed the PFS and/or response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria and 8 studies assessed the safety, tolerability and/or adverse events. These studies show that the range of MOS of ICI treatments was between 2.6-10.4 months (MOS using current standard treatment for recurrent GBM = 3.5-12.5 months). The median PFS and the median period until patients reach partial response score based on RANO criteria are ranging from 1.5 months to 4.6 months (PFS using current standard treatment is 5.5 months). In conclusion, ICIs are safe in patients with GBM. Reported adverse effects only include mild fatigue, headache, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea. However, ICIs display suboptimal clinical efficacy compared to conventional GBM treatments. Therefore, further research is needed in order to improve the clinical efficacy of ICIs.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Method: A PRISMA selection protocol was used to identify studies across electronic databases such as; PubMed, Google scholar, Cochrane, Embase, and web of science from inception until November 23, 2022, where data from SBRT studies were compared to data from a combination of SBRT and ICIs for advanced pancreatic cancer. The endpoints recorded after therapy were overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related adverse effect (TRAE) were collected in each study. Results: The primary endpoint (OS) retrieved from five studies following SBRT disclosed OS at the rate of one year at 44% as compared to the combination studies of SBRT+ICI with 42%. PFS recorded at the rate of 1 year revealed an outcome of 46% following SBRT. In contrast, PFS in the combination studies recorded SBRT+ICI of 86%. The risk of grade >3 TRAE in the SBRT was 21.5% as compared to the combination studies of 75%. This risk of grade>3 TRAE was reduced as compared to any grade in two studies (Heterogeneity: Chi² = 2.78, df = 1 (P = 0.10); I² = 64%). Conclusion: The Combination of SBRT and ICIs demonstrate modest treatment efficiency and acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, combination trials are fewer, and further studies are warranted.

Non-classical Monocytes Enhance the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Colon Cancer in a Syngeneic Mouse Model.

The response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is approximately 10%-30% and only in a few cancer types. In the present study, we determined whether non-classical monocytes (NCMs) could enhance ICI efficacy in colon cancer using a syngeneic mouse model. The MC38 C57BL/6 mouse colon cancer model was used. Cells collected from the bone marrow of C57BL/6 mice were cultured, and NCMs were fractionated by cell sorting and administered via the tail veins to the mice implanted with MC38 cells. The anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody was administered three times, and tumor volume and overall survival were observed. More tumors were eradicated and more complete response occurred, after cotreatment with ICIs and NCMs than after treatment with ICIs alone. Moreover, no efficacy was observed when NCMs were administered alone. NCMs enhance ICI efficacy. The underlying mechanisms and clinical applications will be studied in the future.

Icis Treatment for Different MSI Colorectal Cancer: Theoretical Basis, Status Quo And Outlook

As the third cancer worldwide, the incidence and the cancer-related mortality is both high in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The treatment of CRC has standard methods, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and other general therapy. However, these systemic therapies are not specific, which are also toxic for normal cells and show many side effects in patients. New immunotherapeutic strategies have changed the landscape of treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC), especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). After research, the condition of microsatellite instability (MSI) has proven to be one of the main influencing factors of ICIs' efficacy. This review comprehensively analyses the possible mechanisms underlying the varying efficacy of ICIs in the treatment of different MSI tumors and evaluates potential therapeutic strategies that offer possible ways to overcome resistance mechanisms.

The Current Achievements and Existing Shortage of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is drug used to treat cancer by blocking immune checkpoint molecules and activating the immune system to attack tumor cells. ICI has limitations, including varying patient immune tolerance, immune-related adverse events, and unclear biomarkers. However, it is currently the most widely used, versatile, and highly effective immunotherapy drug. By comparing the efficacy of ICI with other treatment methods and citing examples of its breakthrough role in different cancers, the superiority of ICI is demonstrated. At the same time, it still has great potential and clinical value in the field of immunotherapy, and there is great room for development in both the design of new targets and the new application of known targets. This article discusses the advantages of ICI, particularly when combined with radio chemotherapy and chemotherapy, in cancer treatment. The summary outlines its mechanism of action, current applications, achievements, and limitations in the field further needed to be addressed.

Effects of an immunosuppressive therapy on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic melanoma – An analysis of the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG

BackgroundThe impact of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) on immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is unclear. MethodsPatients with unresectable advanced melanoma (MM) treated with ICI in the years 2011–2020 were identified from the prospective multicenter German skin cancer registry ADOREG. Patients with IST within 60 days before, or within 30 days after start of ICI were compared to patients without IST. End points were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) determined by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated in a Cox regression model. ResultsOf 814 patients treated with ICI, 73 (9%) received concomitant IST, mainly steroids. Patients with brain metastases (BM) received IST more frequently (n = 34/130 patients; 26%), than patients without BM (39/684 patients; 6%). In patients without BM, IST initiated before, but not IST initiated after start of ICI was significantly associated with worse PFS (univariate hazard ratio (HR) 2.59, 95% confidence interval (95%-CI) 1.07–6.28, p = 0.035; multivariate HR 3.48, 95%-CI 1.26–9.6, p = 0.016). There was no association between IST and OS or DCR. In patients with BM, IST initiated before, but not after start of ICI was significantly associated with worse OS (univariate HR 2.06, 95%-CI 1.07–3.95, p = 0.031; multivariate HR 5.91, 95%-CI 1.74–20.14, p = 0.004). There was no association between IST and PFS or DCR. ConclusionPatients receiving IST 60 days before start of ICI showed a tendency to an impaired therapy outcome. IST initiated within 30 days after start of ICI, mainly due to early side effects, did not affect the efficacy of ICI therapy.

Subcellular localization of PD-L1 and cell-cycle-dependent expression of nuclear PD-L1 variants: implications for head and neck cancer cell functions and therapeutic efficacy.

The programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) axis is primarily associated with immunosuppression in cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). However, mounting evidence is supporting the thesis that PD-L1 not only functions as a ligand but mediates additional cellular functions in tumor cells. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that PD-L1 is not exclusively localized at the cellular membrane. Subcellular fractionation revealed the presence of PD-L1 in various cellular compartments of six well-characterized head and neck cancer (HNC) cell lines, including the nucleus. Via Western blotting, we detected PD-L1 in its well-known glycosylated/deglycosylated state at 40-55 kDa. In addition, we detected previously unknown PD-L1 variants with a molecular weight at approximately 70 and > 150 kDa exclusively in nuclear protein fractions. These in vitro findings were confirmed with primary tumor samples from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that nuclear PD-L1 variant expression is cell-cycle-dependent. Immunofluorescence staining of PD-L1 in different cell cycle phases of synchronized HNC cells supported these observations. Mechanisms of nuclear PD-L1 trafficking remain less understood; however, proximity ligation assays showed a cell-cycle-dependent interaction of the cytoskeletal protein vimentin with PD-L1, whereas vimentin could serve as a potential shuttle for nuclear PD-L1 transportation. Mass spectrometry after PD-L1 co-immunoprecipitation, followed by gene ontology analysis, indicated interaction of nuclear PD-L1 with proteins involved in DNA remodeling and messenger RNA (mRNA) splicing. Our results in HNC cells suggest a highly complex regulation of PD-L1 and multiple tumor cell-intrinsic functions, independent of immune regulation. These observations bear significant implications for the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition.

Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a transformative approach in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite their success, challenges persist, including concerns about their effectiveness, treatment costs, frequent occurrence of treatment-related adverse events, and tumor hyperprogression. Therefore, it is imperative to identify indicators capable of predicting the efficacy of ICIs treatment, enabling optimal patient selection to maximize clinical benefits while minimizing unnecessary toxic side effects and economic losses. This review paper categorizes prognostic biomarkers of ICIs treatment into the following categories: biochemical and cytological indicators, tumor-related markers, imaging and personal features, etiology, gut microbiome, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). By organizing these indicators systematically, we aim to guide biomarker exploration and inform clinical treatment decisions.

The ERK inhibitor LY3214996 augments anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in preclinical mouse models of BRAFV600E melanoma brain metastasis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment; however, only a subset of patients with brain metastasis (BM) respond to ICI. Activating mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway are frequent in BM. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether therapeutic inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) can improve the efficacy of ICI for BM. We used immunotypical mouse models of BM bearing dual extracranial/intracranial tumors to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent and dual-agent treatment with selective ERK inhibitor LY3214996 (LY321) and anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) antibody. We verified target inhibition and drug delivery, then investigated treatment effects on T-cell response and tumor-immune microenvironment using high-parameter flow cytometry, multiplex immunoassays, and T-cell receptor profiling. We found that dual treatment with LY321 and anti-PD-1 significantly improved overall survival in 2 BRAFV600E-mutant murine melanoma models but not in KRAS-mutant murine lung adenocarcinoma. We demonstrate that although LY321 has limited blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, combined LY321 and anti-PD-1 therapy increases tumor-infiltrating CD8+ effector T cells, broadens the T-cell receptor repertoire in the extracranial tumor, enriches T-cell clones shared by the periphery and brain, and reduces immunosuppressive cytokines and cell populations in tumors. Despite the limited BBB permeability of LY321, combined LY321 and anti-PD-1 treatment can improve intracranial disease control by amplifying extracranial immune responses, highlighting the role of extracranial tumors in driving intracranial response to treatment. Combined ERK and PD-1 inhibition is a promising therapeutic approach, worthy of further investigation for patients with melanoma BM.

Sequential PET/CT and pathological biomarker crosstalk predict response to PD-1 blockers alone or combined with sunitinib in propensity score-matched cohorts of cancer of unknown primary treatment.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including toripalimab and pembrolizumab, has not been confirmed in the treatment of cancer of unknown primary (CUP), which has a very poor prognosis. Combined with anti-angiogenic therapies, ICIs are hypothesized to be effective in prolonging overall survival. The study aims to give evidence on the treatment effects of sunitinib combined with ICIs, find pathological biomarkers associated with changes in volumetric 18F FDG PET/CT parameters, and investigate inner associations among these markers associated with response on PET/CT. The study recruited patients receiving combined treatment (ICIs + sunitinib), compared the effects of combined treatment with those of separate treatment and age-matched negative controls, and analyzed propensity score-matched (PSM) pairs. Markers associated with survival were identified, and their inner associations were tested using structural equation modeling. A total of 292 patients were enrolled in the final analysis, with 53 patients receiving combined treatment. Survival analysis demonstrated significantly prolonged survival in either combined or separate treatment, with the combined arm showing better response when PSM-paired using pre-treatment whole-body PET/CT parameters. The angiogenic markers KDR and VEGF mediate the PD-1 blockade impact on volumetric value changes in positive and negative manners. The anti-angiogenic agent sunitinib may potentiate PD-1 blockade by diminishing angiogenesis or its downstream effects. The combined separate treatment increased the survival of CUP patients, and the responses could be evaluated using volumetric PET/CT parameters.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Immunochemotherapeutic Strategies for Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

AimsThe aim of this network meta-analysis was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of various immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methodsData from randomised controlled trials comparing perioperative ICI–chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone were acquired from the EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, and meeting abstracts from inception until August 2023. The endpoints for this analysis were pathological complete response, event-free survival and treatment-related adverse events of any grade or adverse events of grade 3 or higher. ResultsIn total, six randomised controlled trials with 2538 NSCLC patients were selected for this network meta-analysis. Compared with other ICIs, toripalimab + chemotherapy demonstrated increased pathological complete response rates and prolonged event-free survival in NSCLC. In patients with negative/low PD-L1 expression or squamous cell pathology, toripalimab + chemotherapy was the most effective regimen. In contrast, nivolumab + chemotherapy was preferable for patients with high PD-L1 expression or non-squamous cell pathology. Among the analysed regimens, toripalimab + chemotherapy presented the highest risk of adverse events of any grade, whereas nivolumab + chemotherapy showed the highest risk of grade 3–4 adverse events. Conversely, durvalumab + chemotherapy exhibited the lowest risk of grade 3–4 adverse events. ConclusionsAmong the evaluated perioperative immunochemotherapy regimens, toripalimab + chemotherapy indicated a significantly increased survival benefit for most resectable NSCLC patients. However, for high PD-L1 expression and non-squamous NSCLC patients, nivolumab + chemotherapy provided the most potent outcomes. Perioperative durvalumab + chemotherapy is a relatively safe treatment. The findings of this investigation are expected to assist clinicians in making informed decisions among promising treatment options.