As mentioned in my Summer 2007 Editor's Note, the Model Curricula for Journalism for Developing Countries & Emerging Democracies, published by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), was unveiled in June at the World Journalism Congress (WJEC) in Singapore. Almost two years in the making, it is a rather impressive 148-page document covering print and broadcast education, for undergraduates (with three- and four-year university versions) and graduate students. (This curriculum does not cover public relations or advertising, or even photojournalism (which is merely mentioned], for that matter.) Scholars who managed this project were from Australia, Benin, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Ghana, India, Lebanon, Morocco, Qatar, Singapore, South Africa, and the United States, while scholars from most of those countries and others wrote individual syllabi and/or reviewed various drafts. [Model Curricula reprints, on pages 35-38, the 2006 Tartu of the European Journalism Training Association, which I also reprinted in this space in the summer issue.) Model Curricula's introduction sets the tone, with its explicit references to democracy that were missing from the Declaration of Principles of Journalism Education drawn up by WJEC attendees, and the book's criticism that, weakness of much of education arises out of a failure to grasp the degree to which education in university disciplines constitutes (with reporting and writing) the of the practice of journalism. In case that isn't clear enough, Model Curricula, by page 9, is rejecting an education outside of that is merely a general background and is instead essentially propos[ing] that students in universities double major in and another discipline as politics, economics, arts and culture, social issues, international relations, and natural and physical science and associated subjects such as the environment, health, and technology. While many of us in the United States routinely recommend a second major to print and broadcast students, a much smaller percentage complete that second major, and the UNESCO document comes close to suggesting that such a plan be a requirement at universities where it is possible. A close reading of Model Curricula offers plenty else to think about. Among its foundations of journalism are a understanding of and research methods and of national and international political, economic, cultural, religious, and social institutions. Remember, these are standards being proposed for developing countries. Yet the book follows up on evidence and research mediods by specifying Arithmetical skills and a basic knowledge of statistics and survey methods. Similarly, the senior-level science and health reporting syllabus, written by Nigeria's Idowu Sobowale, takes it for granted that such a course should include-among other topics-the economic implications of well focused or healthcare delivery system....noise pollution....alternative sources of healthcare: medicinal herbs, leaves and roots; synergy between alternative and orthodox medicine; quality control....general agriculture....food science and technology....energy....mining....blood. Even among the relatively few science and/or health reporting courses being taught in the United States, how many of them are covering all of those topics? And could anyone seriously argue that such courses in developed countries shouldn't touch on them all (with the possible exception of the healthcare delivery system, as not all countries have one as haphazard as the United States')? Yet all I could think about are the various books, articles, and papers, by scholars both inside and outside journalism/mass communication, on how much science, social science, and just plain numbers (such as budget increases, or poll results) get mangled by U. …
Read full abstract