Double-stranded Telomeric DNA Research Articles

Impact of shelterin complex on telomere accessibility.

Telomeres terminate with a 50-300 bases long single-stranded G-rich overhang, which can be misrecognized as a DNA damage repair site. Shelterin plays critical roles in maintaining and protecting telomere ends by regulating access of various physiological agents to telomeric DNA, but the underlying mechanism is not well understood. Here, we measure how shelterin affects the accessibility of long telomeric overhangs by monitoring transient binding events of a short complementary peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe using FRET-PAINT in vitro. We observed that the POT1 subunit of shelterin reduces the accessibility of the PNA probe by ∼2.5 fold, indicating that POT1 effectively binds to and protects otherwise exposed telomeric sequences. In comparison, a four-component shelterin stabilizes POT1 binding to the overhang by tethering POT1 to the double-stranded telomeric DNA and reduces the accessibility of telomeric overhangs by ∼5-fold. This enhanced protection suggests shelterin restructures the junction between single and double-stranded telomere, which is otherwise the most accessible part of the telomeric overhang.

Shelterin reduces the accessibility of telomeric overhangs.

Telomeres terminate with a 50-300 bases long single-stranded G-rich overhang, which can be misrecognized as a DNA damage repair site. Shelterin plays critical roles in maintaining and protecting telomere ends by regulating access of various physiological agents to telomeric DNA, but the underlying mechanism is not well understood. Here, we measure how shelterin affects the accessibility of long telomeric overhangs by monitoring transient binding events of a short complementary peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe using FRET-PAINT in vitro. We observed that the POT1 subunit of shelterin reduces the accessibility of the PNA probe by ∼2.5-fold, indicating that POT1 effectively binds to and protects otherwise exposed telomeric sequences. In comparison, a four-component shelterin stabilizes POT1 binding to the overhang by tethering POT1 to the double-stranded telomeric DNA and reduces the accessibility of telomeric overhangs by ∼5-fold. This enhanced protection suggests shelterin restructures the junction between single and double-stranded telomere, which is otherwise the most accessible part of the telomeric overhang.

Different ages of development human ovaries exhibit different telomerase activity and telomere length leads to ovarian aging

Background and Aim: Telomeres are repetitive DNA sequences localized at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. These unique structures are composed of telomeric DNA and telomere-associated proteins. Of telomere-associated proteins, telomeric repeat factor 1 (TRF1) and 2 (TRF2) bind double-stranded telomeric DNA to regulate telomeres length throughout cellular lifespan. On the other hand, protection of telomeres 1 (POT1) interacts with single-stranded telomeric DNA and contributes to protecting genome integrity.

Rif2 protects Rap1-depleted telomeres from MRX-mediated degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Rap1 is the main protein that binds double-stranded telomeric DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Examination of the telomere functions of Rap1 is complicated by the fact that it also acts as a transcriptional regulator of hundreds of genes and is encoded by an essential gene. In this study, we disrupt Rap1 telomere association by expressing a mutant telomerase RNA subunit (tlc1-tm) that introduces mutant telomeric repeats. tlc1-tm cells grow similar to wild-type cells, although depletion of Rap1 at telomeres causes defects in telomere length regulation and telomere capping. Rif2 is a protein normally recruited to telomeres by Rap1, but we show that Rif2 can still associate with Rap1-depleted tlc1-tm telomeres, and that this association is required to inhibit telomere degradation by the MRX complex. Rif2 and the Ku complex work in parallel to prevent tlc1-tm telomere degradation; tlc1-tm cells lacking Rif2 and the Ku complex are inviable. The partially redundant mechanisms may explain the rapid evolution of telomere components in budding yeast species.

The spatiotemporal expression of TERT and telomere repeat binding proteins in the postnatal mouse testes.

Telomeres consist of repetitive DNA sequences and telomere-associated proteins. Telomeres located at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes undergo shortening due to DNA replication, genotoxic factors and reactive oxygen species. The short telomeres are elongated by the enzyme telomerase expressed in the germ line, embryonic and stem cells. Telomerase is in the structure of ribonucleoprotein composed of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), telomerase RNA component (Terc) and other components. Among telomere-associated proteins, telomeric repeat binding factor 1 (TRF1) and 2 (TRF2) exclusively bind to the double-stranded telomeric DNA to regulate its length. However, protection of telomeres 1 (POT1) interacts with the single-stranded telomeric DNA to protect from DNA damage response. Herein, we characterised the spatial and temporal expression of the TERT, TRF1, TRF2 and POT1 proteins in the postnatal mouse testes at the ages of 6, 8, 16, 20, 29, 32 and 88days by using immunohistochemistry. Significant differences in the spatiotemporal expression patterns and levels of these proteins were determined in the postnatal testes (p<.05). These findings indicate that TERT and telomere repeat binding proteins seem to be required for maintaining the length and structural integrity of telomeres in the spermatogenic cells from newborn to adult terms.

TIN2 Facilitates TRF1-Mediated trans- and cis-Interactions on Physiologically Relevant Long Telomeric DNA

The shelterin complex consisting of TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, TPP1, and POT1, functions to prevent false recognition of telomeres as double-strand DNA breaks, and to regulate telomerase and DNA repair protein access. TIN2 is a core component linking double-stranded telomeric DNA binding proteins (TRF1 and TRF2) and proteins at the 3’ overhang (TPP1-POT1). Since knockdown of TIN2 also removes TRF1 and TRF2 from telomeres, determining TIN2's unique mechanistic function has been elusive. Here, we investigated DNA molecular structures promoted by TRF1-TIN2 using complementary single-molecule imaging platforms, including atomic force microscopy (AFM), total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM), and the DNA tightrope assay. We demonstrate that TIN2S and TIN2L isoforms facilitate TRF1-mediated DNA compaction (cis-interactions) and DNA-DNA bridging (trans-interactions) in a telomeric sequence- and length-dependent manner. On the short telomeric DNA substrate (6 TTAGGG repeats), the majority of TRF1 mediated telomeric DNA-DNA bridging events are transient with a lifetime of ∼1.95 s. On longer DNA substrates (270 TTAGGG), TIN2 forms multi-protein complexes with TRF1 and stabilizes TRF1-mediated DNA-DNA bridging events that last for at least minutes. Pre-incubation of TRF1 with its regulator protein Tankyrase 1 significantly reduces TRF1-TIN2 mediated DNA-DNA bridging, whereas TIN2 protects the disassembly of TRF1-TIN2 mediated DNA-DNA bridging upon Tankyrase 1 addition. Our study provides evidence that TIN2 functions to promote TRF1 mediated trans-interactions of telomeric DNA, leading to new mechanistic insight into sister telomere cohesion.

Decreased expression of TERT and telomeric proteins as human ovaries age may cause telomere shortening.

Telomeres are repetitive sequences localized at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes comprising noncoding DNA and telomere-binding proteins. TRF1 and TRF2 both bind to the double-stranded telomeric DNA to regulate its length throughout the lifespan of eukaryotic cells. POT1 interacts with single-stranded telomeric DNA and contributes to protecting genomic integrity. Previous studies have shown that telomeres gradually shorten as ovaries age, coinciding with fertility loss. However, the molecular background of telomere shortening with ovarian aging is not fully understood. The present study aimed to determine the spatial and temporal expression levels of the TERT, TRF1, TRF2, and POT1 proteins in different groups of human ovaries: fetal (n = 11), early postnatal (n = 10), premenopausal (n = 12), and postmenopausal (n = 14). Also, the relative telomere signal intensity of each group was measured using the Q-FISH method. We found that the telomere signal intensities decreased evenly and significantly from fetal to postmenopausal groups (P < 0.05). The TERT, TRF1, TRF2, and POT1 proteins were localized in the cytoplasmic and nuclear regions of the oocytes, granulosa and stromal cells. Furthermore, the expression levels of these proteins reduced significantly from fetal to postmenopausal groups (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that decreased TERT and telomere-binding protein expression may underlie the telomere shortening of ovaries with age, which may be associated with female fertility loss. Further investigations are required to elicit the molecular mechanisms regulating the gradual decrease in the expression of TERT and telomere-binding proteins in human oocytes and granulosa cells during ovarian aging.

Dynamic topology of double-stranded telomeric DNA studied by single-molecule manipulation in vitro.

The dynamic topological structure of telomeric DNA is closely related to its biological function; however, no such structural information on full-length telomeric DNA has been reported due to difficulties synthesizing long double-stranded telomeric DNA. Herein, we developed an EM-PCR and TA cloning-based approach to synthesize long-chain double-stranded tandem repeats of telomeric DNA. Using mechanical manipulation assays based on single-molecule atomic force microscopy, we found that mechanical force can trigger the melting of double-stranded telomeric DNA and the formation of higher-order structures (G-quadruplexes or i-motifs). Our results show that only when both the G-strand and C-strand of double-stranded telomeric DNA form higher-order structures (G-quadruplexes or i-motifs) at the same time (e.g. in the presence of 100 mM KCl under pH 4.7), that the higher-order structure(s) can remain after the external force is removed. The presence of monovalent K+, single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), acidic conditions, or short G-rich fragments (∼30 nt) can shift the transition from dsDNA to higher-order structures. Our results provide a new way to regulate the topology of telomeric DNA.

Either Rap1 or Cdc13 can protect telomeric single-stranded 3\u2032 overhangs from degradation in vitro

Telomeres, the DNA-protein structures capping the ends of linear chromosomes, are important for regulating replicative senescence and maintaining genome stability. Telomeres consist of G-rich repetitive sequences that end in a G-rich single-stranded (ss) 3′ overhang, which is vital for telomere function. It is largely unknown how the 3′ overhang is protected against exonucleases. In budding yeast, double-stranded (ds) telomeric DNA is bound by Rap1, while ssDNA is bound by Cdc13. Here, we developed an in vitro DNA 3′end protection assay to gain mechanistic insight into how Naumovozyma castellii Cdc13 and Rap1 may protect against 3′ exonucleolytic degradation by Exonuclease T. Our results show that Cdc13 protects the 3′ overhang at least 5 nucleotides (nt) beyond its binding site, when bound directly adjacent to the ds-ss junction. Rap1 protects 1–2 nt of the 3′ overhang when bound to dsDNA adjacent to the ds-ss junction. Remarkably, when Rap1 is bound across the ds-ss junction, the protection of the 3′ overhang is extended to 6 nt. This shows that binding by either Cdc13 or Rap1 can protect telomeric overhangs from 3′ exonucleolytic degradation, and suggests a new important role for Rap1 in protecting short overhangs under circumstances when Cdc13 cannot bind the telomere.

Structural biology of telomeres and telomerase.

Telomeres are protein-DNA complexes that protect chromosome ends from illicit ligation and resection. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that synthesizes telomeric DNA to counter telomere shortening. Human telomeres are composed of complexes between telomeric DNA and a six-protein complex known as shelterin. The shelterin proteins TRF1 and TRF2 provide the binding affinity and specificity for double-stranded telomeric DNA, while the POT1-TPP1 shelterin subcomplex coats the single-stranded telomeric G-rich overhang that is characteristic of all our chromosome ends. By capping chromosome ends, shelterin protects telomeric DNA from unwanted degradation and end-to-end fusion events. Structures of the human shelterin proteins reveal a network of constitutive and context-specific interactions. The shelterin protein-DNA structures reveal the basis for both the high affinity and DNA sequence specificity of these interactions, and explain how shelterin efficiently protects chromosome ends from genome instability. Several protein-protein interactions, many provided by the shelterin component TIN2, are critical for upholding the end-protection function of shelterin. A survey of these protein-protein interfaces within shelterin reveals a series of "domain-peptide" interactions that allow for efficient binding and adaptability towards new functions. While the modular nature of shelterin has facilitated its part-by-part structural characterization, the interdependence of subunits within telomerase has made its structural solution more challenging. However, the exploitation of several homologs in combination with recent advancements in cryo-EM capabilities has led to an exponential increase in our knowledge of the structural biology underlying telomerase function. Telomerase homologs from a wide range of eukaryotes show a typical retroviral reverse transcriptase-like protein core reinforced with elements that deliver telomerase-specific functions including recruitment to telomeres and high telomere-repeat addition processivity. In addition to providing the template for reverse transcription, the RNA component of telomerase provides a scaffold for the catalytic and accessory protein subunits, defines the limits of the telomeric repeat sequence, and plays a critical role in RNP assembly, stability, and trafficking. While a high-resolution definition of the human telomerase structure is only beginning to emerge, the quick pace of technical progress forecasts imminent breakthroughs in this area. Here, we review the structural biology surrounding telomeres and telomerase to provide a molecular description of mammalian chromosome end protection and end replication.

Length doesn't matter-telomere damage triggers cellular senescence in the ageing heart.

Telomere shortening induces cellular senescence in proliferative cells. Yet, it is presently unclear how it is triggered in post‐mitotic cells such as cardiac myocytes. A new study by Anderson et al (2019) reports that during ageing of the heart, cellular senescence develops independently of telomere length, but is evoked by DNA damage, which preferentially accumulates at the telomere. Removal of senescent cells using senolytic drugs ameliorated cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis and may inform novel approaches to improve the conditions for the ageing heart.

Protection of telomeres 1 proteins POT1a and POT1b can repress ATR signaling by RPA exclusion, but binding to CST limits ATR repression by POT1b

Comprised of telomeric TTAGGG repeats and shelterin, telomeres ensure that the natural ends of chromosomes remain impervious to the DNA damage response. Telomeres carry a long constitutive 3' overhang that can bind replication protein A (RPA) and activate the ATR Ser/Thr kinase (ATR), which induces cell cycle arrest. A single-stranded (ss) TTAGGG repeat-binding protein in mouse shelterin, POT1a, has been proposed to repress ATR signaling by preventing RPA binding. Repression of ATR at telomeres requires tethering of POT1a to the other shelterin subunits situated on the double-stranded (ds) telomeric DNA. The simplest model of ATR repression, the "tethered exclusion model," suggests that the only critical features of POT1a are its connection to shelterin and its binding to ss telomeric DNA. In agreement with the model, we show here that a shelterin-tethered variant of RPA70 (lacking the ATR recruitment domain) can repress ATR signaling at telomeres that lack POT1a. However, arguing against the tethered exclusion model, the nearly identical POT1b subunit of shelterin has been shown to be much less proficient than POT1a in repression of ATR. We now show that POT1b has the intrinsic ability to fully repress ATR but is prevented from doing so when bound to Ctc1, Stn1, Ten1 (CST), the complex needed for telomere end processing. These results establish that shelterin represses ATR with a tethered ssDNA-binding domain that excludes RPA from the 3' overhang and also reveal an unexpected effect of CST on the ability of POT1b to repress ATR.

The inhibition of checkpoint activation by telomeres does not involve exclusion of dimethylation of histone H4 lysine 20 (H4K20me2).

DNA double-strand (DSBs) breaks activate the DNA damage checkpoint machinery to pause or halt the cell cycle. Telomeres, the specific DNA-protein complexes at linear eukaryotic chromosome ends, are capped DSBs that do not activate DNA damage checkpoints. This "checkpoint privileged" status of telomeres was previously investigated in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe lacking the major double-stranded telomere DNA binding protein Taz1. Telomeric DNA repeats in cells lacking Taz1 are 10 times longer than normal and contain single-stranded DNA regions. DNA damage checkpoint proteins associate with these damaged telomeres, but the DNA damage checkpoint is not activated. This severing of the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway was reported to stem from exclusion of histone H4 lysine 20 dimethylation (H4K20me2) from telomeric nucleosomes in both wild type cells and cells lacking Taz1. However, experiments to identify the mechanism of this exclusion failed, prompting our re-evaluation of H4K20me2 levels at telomeric chromatin. In this short report, we used an extensive series of controls to identify an antibody specific for the H4K20me2 modification and show that the level of this modification is the same at telomeres and internal loci in both wild type cells and those lacking Taz1. Consequently, telomeres must block activation of the DNA Damage Response by another mechanism that remains to be determined.

How telomeres solve the chromosome end‐protection problem

Chromosome ends can activate the DNA damage response (DDR) signaling pathways and become substrates for Double‐strand Break (DSB) repair. Telomeres solve this end‐protection problem by repressing all forms of DDR signaling and DSB repair. The telomeric DNA, maintained by telomerase, binds a six‐subunit protein complex, termed shelterin, that protects chromosome ends. Shelterin binds to the double‐stranded (ds) telomeric DNA through two subunits, TRF1 and TRF2. These proteins recruit a single‐stranded (ss) telomeric DNA binding factor, POT1, which binds to the ss telomeric repeats present at all chromosome ends. POT1 is linked to TRF1 and TRF2 via interactions involving TPP1 and TIN2. A sixth component, Rap1, interacts with TRF2. Conditional knockout experiments in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) have revealed the mechanism by which this simple protein complex prevents activation of the ATM and ATR DNA damage signaling pathways, represses 5′ end resection, and prevents non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology directed repair (HDR) at telomeres. Shelterin is compartmentalized such that TRF2 represses ATM signaling and NHEJ, whereas ATR signaling is repressed by POT1. The mechanism by which TRF2 represses ATM signaling and NHEJ involves the remodeling of telomeres into the t‐loop structure, which essentially hides the chromosome end. POT1 represses ATR signaling by preventing the ssDNA sensor in the ATR pathway, RPA, from binding to telomeres. Progress on the mechanistic aspects of shelterin mediated chromosome end protection will be presented.Support or Funding InformationDr. de Lange is funded by awards from the NIH, American Cancer Society, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the STARR Cancer ConsortiumThis abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Understanding diversity in telomere dynamics.

Telomeres and their associated proteins constitute an ancient and highly conserved system to maintain chromosome stability and the integrity of the coding sequences in eukaryote genomes. They identify and protect the chromosome ends. While other linear chromosome-capping mechanisms also occur in nature [1], the telomeric system appears to be the most common. Many operational principles of this system are shared across a wide range of eukaryote species, indicative of its ancient origins. Telomere DNA generally comprises a string of a repeated, short, non-coding sequence, which is often G rich, such as TTAGGG [2]. The proximal end of the telomeric tract is double stranded, and the distal end terminates in a single-stranded overhang of the G-rich strand. The structure loops back on itself and the single-stranded section intrudes into the double-stranded telomeric DNA. Specific protein complexes, termed the shelterin and CST complexes, help to maintain the t-loop structure and regulate telomere access during DNA replication (e.g. for review, see [3]). Processes occur within cells not only to maintain telomere structure, but also to restore the loss of telomeric DNA that occurs as a natural consequence of the DNA replication process. Until relatively recently, almost all of the work on telomeres was in the context of understanding how malfunctioning of this system of chromosome protection can lead to human disease. However, there has been a burgeoning of interest in looking at how the telomere system operates in different kinds of animals, and in understanding variation in telomere dynamics and in the expression of telomerase in species with different morphologies and life histories. This theme issue represents a relatively unusual coming together of scientists from different disciplinary backgrounds, including evolutionary biology, ecology, cell biology and biomedicine, to understand and elucidate the origins and diversity of telomere dynamics, …

Analysis of Telomere-Homologous DNA with Different Conformations Using 2D Agarose Electrophoresis and In-Gel Hybridization.

In mammalian cells, in addition to double-stranded telomeric DNA at chromosome ends, extra telomere-homologous DNA is present that adopts different conformations, including single-stranded G- or C-rich DNA, extrachromosomal circular DNA (T-circle), and telomeric complex (T-complex) with an unidentified structure. The formation of such telomere-homologous DNA is closely related to telomeric DNA metabolism and chromosome end protection by telomeres. Conventional agarose gel electrophoresis is unable to separate DNA based on conformation. Here, we introduce the method of two-dimensional (2D) agarose electrophoresis in combination with in-gel native/denatured hybridization to determine different conformations formed by telomere-homologous DNA.

Telomere G-Rich Overhang Length Measurement: DSN Method.

Telomeres terminate in 3' single-stranded G-rich overhangs that function in telomere end protection and telomerase action. An accurate measurement of overhang length is challenging due to the presence of many kilobases of double-stranded telomere DNA. Here, a simple method is described that utilizes duplex specific nuclease (DSN) to digest all double-stranded DNA including telomeres to fragments of <10 bp, leaving the single-stranded overhangs intact. Their length can then be determined by Southern blot using super-sensitive telomere C-rich probes.

A balance between elongation and trimming regulates telomere stability in stem cells.

Telomere length maintenance ensures self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), however the mechanisms governing telomere length homeostasis in these cell types are unclear. Here, we report that telomere length is determined by the balance between telomere elongation mediated by telomerase and telomere trimming, controlled by the homologous recombination proteins XRCC3 and Nbs1 that generate single-stranded C-rich telomeric DNA and double-stranded telomeric circular DNA (T-circles), respectively. We found that reprogramming of differentiated cells induces T-circle and single stranded C-rich telomeric DNA accumulation, indicating the activation of telomere trimming pathways that compensate telomerase dependent telomere elongation in hiPSCs. Excessive telomere elongation compromises telomere stability and promotes the formation of partially single-stranded telomeric DNA circles (C-circles) in hESCs, suggesting heightened sensitivity of stem cells to replication stress at overly long telomeres. Thus, tight control of telomere length homeostasis is essential to maintain telomere stability in hESCs.

Molecular basis and quantitative assessment of TRF1 and TRF2 protein interactions with TIN2 and Apollo peptides.

Shelterin is a six-protein complex (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, RAP1, TIN2, and TPP1) that also functions in smaller subsets in regulation and protection of human telomeres. Two closely related proteins, TRF1 and TRF2, make high-affinity contact directly with double-stranded telomeric DNA and serve as a molecular platform. Protein TIN2 binds to TRF1 and TRF2 dimer-forming domains, whereas Apollo makes interaction only with TRF2. To elucidate the molecular basis of these interactions, we employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of TRF1TRFH-TIN2TBM and TRF2TRFH-TIN2TBM/ApolloTBM complexes and of the isolated proteins. MD enabled a structural and dynamical comparison of protein-peptide complexes including H-bond interactions and interfacial residues that may regulate TRF protein binding to the given peptides, especially focusing on interactions described in crystallographic data. Residues with a selective function in both TRF1TRFH and TRF2TRFH and forming a stable hydrogen bond network with TIN2TBM or ApolloTBM peptides were traced. Our study revealed that TIN2TBM forms a well-defined binding mode with TRF1TRFH as compared to TRF2TRFH, and that the binding pocket of TIN2TBM is deeper for TRF2TRFH protein than ApolloTBM. The MD data provide a basis for the reinterpretation of mutational data obtained in crystallographic work for the TRF proteins. Together, the previously determined X-ray structure and our MD provide a detailed view of the TRF-peptide binding mode and the structure of TRF1/2 binding pockets. Particular TRF-peptide interactions are very specific for the formation of each protein-peptide complex, identifying TRF proteins as potential targets for the design of inhibitors/drugs modulating telomere machinery for anticancer therapy.

Shelterin

Schmutz and de Lange discuss the shelterin complex, which binds to mammalian telomeres and allows for the natural ends of chromosomes to be distinguished from sites of DNA damage.