Abstract Background To explore the thoroughness and safety of a modified left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes dissection in thoracoscopic esophageal carcinoma surgery. Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 136 patients with the left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes dissection from October 2015 to October 2017 in the First Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University. 67 cases were divided to the traditional dissection group (double lumen endotracheal intubation, 90 ° lateral position) and 69 cases were classified to the modified dissection group (single cavity tracheal intubation, thoracic CO2 positive pressure ventilation, lateral prone position and esophageal suspension technology). Observed and compared the left laryngeal recurrent nerve lymph nodes cleaning and time, intraoperative complications including thoracic duct injury, tracheal injury, hoarseness and pneumonia. Results The cleaning time of the modified dissection group (23 + 8 min) was significantly less than that of the traditional cleaning group (32 plus or minus 5min) (P < 0.01). 5 patients occurred left laryngeal nerve injury in the modified dissection group, with statistically significance (P < 0.01), less than traditional dissection group of 12 patients. The modified dissection method improves the exposure of intraoperative field, the probability of thoracic duct and tracheal injury (1/69, 0/69) were lower than the traditional group (2/67, 1/67), but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in lymph nodes metastasis and complications incidence rate (P > 0.05). Conclusion The modified dissection method, including single cavity tracheal intubation, thoracic CO2 positive pressure ventilation, lateral prone position and using esophageal suspension technology, can achieve good operation field exposure, the left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes ‘the whole block’ cleaning, and the greatest degree protection of laryngeal recurrent nerve, thoracic duct, trachea and other organs damage. It is worthy of clinical popularization and application. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Read full abstract