Determination of a drug combination that contains a minor component that is also a poorly UV absorbing analyte represents greet challenges in drug analysis. A fixed-dose ophthalmic combination of ketorolac tromethamine (KET) and dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DEX) (in the ratio of 5:1) is used to relieve post-surgical inflammation and seasonal allergic conjunctivitis due to their analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity. Five spectrophotometric methods and a reversed phase chromatographic separation method were developed and validated for simultaneous determination of both drugs in lab-prepared eye drops. Direct spectrophotometric determination of KET (the major, highly UV absorbing analyte) was achieved from the zero-order UV absorption spectra at 323 nm while DEX (which is the minor, poorly UV absorbing analyte) was quantified after applying several spectrophotometric methods. Either fundamental zero-order spectra or ratio spectra were used, and measurements were done at either single or dual wavelengths. The developed methods were: isosbestic point method, absorption factor method, dual wavelength method, ratio difference UV spectrophotometric method, and simultaneous equation method. The developed spectrophotometric methods determine KET in the linearity range of 2.0–12.0 μg/mL and DEX in the range of 5.0 – 35.0 μg/mL. For accurate spectrophotometric determination of DEX in the ratio of the dosage form, multiple standard addition method was applied. HPLC technique was also applied for separation and quantification of both drugs. Chromatographic separation was attained by using Hypersil ODS-C18 (150 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column. The mobile phase was composed of 50 % methanol: 50 % phosphate buffer (pH 2.5). The column compartment was maintained at 25 °C. Flow rate was adjusted at 1.2 mL/min and detection was performed by DAD at 254 nm. The linearity of HPLC method was 5.0–100.0 μg/mL, and 5.0–50.0 μg/mL for KET and DEX, respectively. Simultaneous determination of both drugs was applied to lab-prepared eye drops that contain also benzalkonium chloride as inactive ingredient. The developed methods determined the cited drugs with good and acceptable % recovery. The results of the developed methods and a reported HPLC method were compared using one-way ANOVA test, F-test and student’s t-test at confidence level 95 %, and they show no significant statistical difference. Assessment of greenness of the developed methods in comparison with reported HPLC method was performed using different tools, including analytical eco-scale, GAPI and AGREE. HPLC-EAT was also performed to ensure greenness of developed HPLC method. Moreover, assessment of practicality, applicability, and functionality of developed and reported methods was evaluated by BAGI metric tool and WAC calculator, respectively. The developed methods allow simple, rapid, and accurate analysis of quality control samples that contain KET and DEX.