Difference In Overall Survival Research Articles

Long term clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients who were recommended surgery but did not undergo it: A SEER database study

BackgroundThis study analyzed the long-term clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients recommended surgery but who did not undergo it using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The aim was to identify the subgroups with comparable overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) through stratified analysis. MethodsCases of cervical cancer were retrieved from SEER database using SEER*Stat software. This included patients in the non-surgery group (recommended surgery but did not undergo it), and a reference surgery group. Propensity score matching balanced differences between the non-surgery and surgery groups. Stratified analysis and log-rank tests were used to identify subgroups within the non-surgery group with comparable OS and CSS to the surgery group. ResultsA total of 30,807 cervical cancer patients were included in the OS and CSS analysis. In the matched cohort (n = 1278), patients in the non-surgery group had significantly lower 5-year CSS (63.2 % vs. 80.1 %, P < 0.001) and 5-year OS (59.0 % vs. 78.0 %, P < 0.001). However, within the matched cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in OS and CSS between the non-surgery and surgery groups in subgroups diagnosed during 2010–2014 (P = 0.064, P = 0.182), 2015–2020 (P = 0.122, P = 0.518), T2 stage (P = 0.139, P = 0.052), T3 stage (P = 0.502, P = 0.317), or with distant metastasis (M1) (P = 0.411, P = 0.520). ConclusionPatients in the non-surgery group generally exhibited lower long-term clinical outcomes compared to those in the surgery group. However, with advancements in non-surgical treatment techniques, particularly notable in patients with T2, T3, and M1 stages, these differences are gradually diminishing.

Comparison of R-CHOP-14 and R-mini-CHOP in older adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma entity, and its incidence increases with age. There is a paucity of data regarding use of biweekly R-CHOP (R-CHOP-14) in patients ≥80 years of age. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with DLBCL aged ≥80 years treated with R-CHOP-14 and R-miniCHOP in two academic tertiary centers in Germany between 01/01/2005 and 12/30/2019. Overall, 79 patients were included. Median age was 84 years (range 80-91). Despite higher CR rates with R-CHOP-14 (71.4% vs. 52.4%), no statistically significant difference could be found between patients treated with R-CHOP-14 and R-miniCHOP regarding overall survival (OS) (p = .88, HR 0.94, 95% CI = 0.47-1.90) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = .26, HR 0.66, 95% CI = 0.32-1.36). At a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-year OS rates were 56% with R-CHOP-14 and 53% with R-miniCHOP. Two-year PFS rates were 46% for R-CHOP-14 and 50% for R-mini-CHOP. Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy did not correlate with OS (p = .72). With the caveat of a retrospective cohort study, we conclude that lacking a difference in OS, R-miniCHOP should be preferred for most patients with untreated DLBCL aged ≥80 years.

Efficacy of avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma with histologic subtype and divergent differentiation: a multicenter retrospective study conducted by the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu.

The subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC) has been known to possess morphological diversity for histologic subtype or divergent differentiation. However, the efficacy of avelumab against SUC remains unclear. Therefore, the effect of the treatment as well as the survival results of avelumab monotherapy were evaluated as a first-line therapeutic maintenance in patients with advanced SUC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu study population with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who underwent avelumab maintenance therapy without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and SUC were comparatively analyzed based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Out of 49 recorded patients, 38 and 11 had PUC and SUC, respectively. The most common subtype element was glandular differentiation (n=5), followed by squamous differentiation (n=3), micropapillary (n=1), and plasmacytoid subtypes (n=1). The SUC and PUC groups had comparable ORR (0% vs. 2.6%, P>0.99) and disease control rates (54.5% vs. 44.7%, P=0.73). These patient groups also showed no significant difference in PFS (median 3.9 vs. 3.1 months, P=0.33) or OS (median 16.7 vs. 22.1 months, P=0.47). The response of SUC and PUC to avelumab was comparable in patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer, indicating that avelumab maintenance therapy is also effective for SUC.

Axillary management and long-term oncologic outcomes in breast cancer patients with clinical N1 disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundLow false negative rates can be achieved with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients with clinical N1 (cN1) disease. We examined changes in axillary management and oncologic outcomes in BC patients with cN1 disease receiving NAC.MethodsBC patients with biopsy proven cN1 disease treated with NAC were selected from our institutional cancer registry (2014–2017). Patients were grouped by axillary management, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), SLNB followed by ALND, or SLNB alone. Univariable and multivariable survival analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.Results81 patients met inclusion criteria: 31 (38%) underwent ALND, 25 (31%) SLNB + ALND, and 25 (31%) SLNB alone. A SLN was identified in 45/50 (90%) patients who had SLNB. ALND was performed in 25/50 (50%) patients who had SLNB: 18 for a + SLNB, 5 failed SLNB, and 2 insufficient SLNs. 25 patients had SLNB alone, 17 were SLN- and 8 SLN+. In the SLNB alone group, 23/25 (92%) patients received adjuvant radiation (RT). 20 (25%) patients developed BC recurrence: 14 distant (70%), 3 local (15%), 2 regional + distant (10%), and 1 contralateral (5%). In the SLNB alone group, there was 1 axillary recurrence in a patient with a negative SLNB who did not receive RT. Univariable survival analysis showed significant differences in RFS and OS between axillary management groups, ALND/SLNB + ALND vs. SLNB alone (RFS: p = 0.006, OS: p = 0.021). On multivariable survival analysis, worse RFS and OS were observed in patients with TNBC (RFS: HR 3.77, 95% CI 1.70–11.90, p = 0.023; OS: HR 8.10, 95% CI 1.84–35.60, p = 0.006).ConclusionsSLNB alone and RT after NAC in BC patients with cN1 disease who have negative SLNs at surgery provides long-term regional disease control. This analysis provides support for the practice of axillary downstaging with NAC and SLNB alone.

Multiple craniotomies in patients with brain metastases: a two-center, propensity score-matched study

The current study addresses the question of whether the resection of more than one BM by multiple craniotomies within the same operation is associated with more adverse events (AEs) and worse functional outcome compared to cases in which only one BM was resected. All patients who underwent more than one craniotomy for resection of multiple BM at two Swiss tertiary neurosurgical care centers were included. Any AEs, functional outcome, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed after 1:1 propensity score matching with patients who underwent removal of a single BM only. A total of 94 patients were included in the final study cohort (47 of whom underwent multiple craniotomies). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the single and the multiple craniotomy group (n = 2 (4.3%) vs. n = 4 (8.5%), p = .7). Change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at discharge demonstrated that slightly more single craniotomy patients improved in mRS, while the proportion of patients who worsened in mRS (16.3 vs. 16.7%) and KPS (13.6 vs. 15.2%) was similar in both groups (p = .42 for mRS and p = .92 for KPS). Survival analysis showed no significant differences in OS between patients with single and multiple craniotomies (p = .18). Resection of multiple BM with more than one craniotomy may be considered a safe option without increased AEs or worse functional outcome.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Single-Center Experience From Southern Turkey

Purpose: Non‑Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounts for 8‑10% of all childhood cancers. In this study, we aimed to describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of pediatric NHL patients treated at a tertiary center. Methods: The oncologic records of the patients diagnosed and followed up as NHL between 2013 and 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: A total of 36 patients were enrolled in this study. The most common pathologic subtype was lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) (n=21, 58.3%) followed by Burkitt lymphoma (BL) (n=10, 27.8%), diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL) (11.1%, n=4), and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) (2.8%, n=1). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were significantly longer in patients without bone marrow (BM) involvement (p=0.001 and p=0.02, respectively). EFS was significantly longer in patients without central nervous system (CNS) involvement (p=0.038). OS and EFS did not differ significantly according to NHL subtypes (p&gt;0.05). There was no significant difference in OS according to age groups (p=0.7). Conclusion: The OS with NHL has significantly improved. With the development of effective treatment regimens based on various pathologic subtypes, the result of pediatric NHL has significantly improved in recent years. The survival rates have reached &gt;90%.

Outcomes and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment prognosis and comparison with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a French multicenter matched real-life study.

The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) has radically changed the treatment strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but raises questions. Our objectives were to determine survival outcomes and safety in a real-life multicenter French cohort, to investigate the on-treatment prognostic value of the bioinflammatory RECA score, and to perform a matched comparison with patients who previously received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive patients enrolled from September 2020 to January 2023 and a post matched comparison with a TKI cohort ( n = 79) by the propensity score matching method. The Atz/Bev population was mainly nonviral disease patients (69%) with Child-Pugh grade A (90%), performance status 0/1 (90%), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (38%) or stage C (62%) classification. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months (3.6-11.7), overall survival (OS) was 13.0 (5.1-28.7) months. OS was independently associated with metastasis, increased alkaline phosphatase, and serum bilirubin levels. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 78% of patients, mostly grade 1 or 2. The RECA score clearly revealed two different prognosis groups after three cycles. No difference in OS was observed after matching between sequential treatment with TKIs and Atz/Bev. This real-life study highlights the importance of liver function when using Atz/Bev combination and the necessity of identifying predictive markers of response to HCC therapies. Our findings suggest a change in practices, with a marked proportion of intermediate stages, and support the on-treatment prognostic value of an inflammatory score.

The landscape of checkpoint inhibitors in oncology

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have become increasingly popular treatment options for patients with cancer, even for patients in non-metastatic settings. Survival and responses have been reported for individual tumor types, but little is known about these outcomes, collectively. We sought to provide an overview of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in ICI drugs tested in registration trials. MethodsIn a cross-sectional analysis of US FDA oncology ICI drug approvals (2011–2023), we searched for supporting ICI registration trials. We characterized these trials, regarding differences in median OS and PFS between patients in intervention and control arm participants in ICI registration trials; percentage of patients who receive ICI crossover; and whether there is correlation between the percentage of crossover and differences in OS or PFS. ResultsFifty-six (54.4 %) approvals had trials that reported median OS for both intervention and control arms (median difference was 2.8 months; IQR: 2.2 to 5.0 months). Sixty-five (63.1 %) approvals had trials that reported PFS data for both arms (median of 0.9 months; IQR: −0.2 to 3.0 months). Subsequent therapy was common (median=18.9 %) and was significantly correlated with a higher difference in median OS in all studies with reported differences (R2 =0.15; p = 0.001). ConclusionICIs are increasingly used in the treatment of cancer, yet the median OS improvement is modest, and many ICIs have not been tested for OS benefit. OS is the outcome most meaningful for patients, and drug regulation should require better testing and reporting of these data.

The effect of examining somatic alterations with NGS in patients with solid tumors, on patient management: A single-center experience in Turkey.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of analyzing somatic alterations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) on treatment management in patients with metastatic solid cancers and their ability to access NGS recommended treatments. This retrospective study included eligible patients who underwent NGS on somatic tumor tissue. We examined the clinical and pathological characteristics of these patients and the alterations in their treatment following NGS results. A total of 101 patients who underwent NGS were included in the study. The most common cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal, and breast cancers, in that order. The median age was 58 (range 21-82) years, with 60 (59.4%) male participants. The median NGS turnaround time was 23 (range 17-29) days. NGS was performed on tissue from the primary lesion in 89(88%) patients. Predictive, prognostic, actionable, or variants of unknown significance were detected in 62(61.4%) patients. The most frequent variants identified were KRAS, EGFR, TP53, PIK3CA, and other rare mutations. Treatment was altered in 17(16.8%) patients based on NGS results. Of the 30 (29.7%) patients for whom NGS-informed treatment was recommended, only seven (6.9%) received the recommended therapy. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients whose treatment was changed based on NGS results and those whose treatment remained unchanged (p = 0.897). There was no difference in OS between patients with and without variants (p = 0.384). NGS analysis of somatic alterations in patients with metastatic cancer may reveal additional variants beyond those identified by baseline tests. However, based on the recommendations of the reimbursement institution in Turkey, only a limited number of patients are able to access treatments recommended by NGS results. Therefore, baseline tests established in Turkey need to be made available in more centers in an appropriate time.

Risk Without Reward: Differing Patterns of Chemotherapy Use Do Not Improve Outcomes in Stage II Early-Onset Colon Cancer.

Rising rates of early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) present challenges in deciding how to optimally treat patients. Although standard of care for stage II CC is surgical resection, adding chemotherapy for high-risk disease, evidence suggests treatment selection may differ by age. We investigated whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administration rates differ between patients with early- and later-onset stage II CC. Data originated from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database spanning January 1, 2003, to August 1, 2021. Adults with stage II CC were grouped as age 18-49 years (EOCC) and those age 50 years or older (later-onset colon cancer [LOCC]). Demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor stage and site, and chemotherapy were included. Primary outcomes included rates of AC administration by age and ethnicity; secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and time to metastatic disease (TTMD). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated relationships between chemotherapy administration, age, and ethnicity, adjusting for significant covariates. One thousand sixty-five patients were included. Median age of patients with EOCC was 45.0 years versus 69.0 years for patients with LOCC. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed patients with EOCC received AC significantly more often than patients with LOCC. Non-Hispanic patients received AC at significantly lower rates than Hispanic patients in both cohorts. Subanalysis of stage IIA patients showed that patients with EOCC were more likely to receive AC than patients with LOCC. No significant differences in OS or TTMD were observed by age regardless of AC administration in stage II overall; however, patients with stage IIA EOCC receiving AC had significantly longer TTMD than those not receiving AC. AC was given preferentially in stage II EOCC, even in stage IIA, despite deviation from guidelines. This may expose low-risk patients to unnecessary toxicities and suggests bias toward treating younger patients more aggressively, despite unclear evidence for better outcomes.

NLR, MLR, and PLR are adverse prognostic variables for sleeve lobectomy within non-small cell lung cancer.

The goal of the research was to examine the value of peripheral blood indicators in forecasting survival and recurrence among people suffering central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing sleeve lobectomy (SL). Clinical information was gathered from 146 individuals suffering from NSCLC who had SL at our facility between January 2014 and May 2023. Peripheral blood neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to establish the threshold points. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate the prognostic value of different groupings, and both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (referred to as COX) were performed. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) cutoff values were carried out via ROC analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed notable differences in OS for NLR (≥2.196 vs. <2.196, p = 0.0009), MLR (≥0.2763 vs. <0.2763, p = 0.0018), and PLR (≥126.11 vs. <126.11, p = 0.0354). Similarly, significant differences in DFS were observed for NLR (≥3.010 vs. <3.010, p = 0.0005), MLR (≥0.2708 vs. <0.2708, p = 0.0046), and PLR (≥126.11 vs. <126.11, p = 0.0028). Univariate Cox analysis showed that NLR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.469; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.416-4.306, p < 0.001), MLR (HR: 2.192, 95% CI: 1.319-3.643, p = 0.002) and PLR (HR: 1.696, 95% CI: 1.029-2.795, p = 0.038) were correlated alongside OS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that NLR (HR: 2.036, 95% CI: 1.072-3.864, p = 0.030) was a separate OS risk variable. Additionally, the pN stage (HR: 3.163, 95% CI: 1.660-6.027, p < 0.001), NLR (HR: 2.530, 95% CI: 1.468-4.360, p < 0.001), MLR (HR: 2.229, 95% CI: 1.260-3.944, p = 0.006) and PLR (HR: 2.249, 95% CI: 1.300-3.889, p = 0.004) were connected to DFS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pN stage (HR: 3.098, 95% CI: 1.619-5.928, p < 0.001) was a separate DFS risk variable. The study demonstrates that NLR, MLR, and PLR play a convenient and cost-effective role in predicting survival and recurrence among individuals alongside central-type NSCLC having SL.

Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Outcomes After Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

BackgroundUmbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) improves access to transplant for patients lacking a fully matched donor. Previous Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) showed that Black patients had a lower overall survival (OS) than White patients following single UCBT. The current study draws on a larger modern cohort and compares outcomes among White, Latinx, Black, and Asian patients. ObjectiveTo compare outcomes by social determinants of health. Study DesignWe designed a retrospective study using CIBMTR data. US patients were between ages 1 and 80; 983 received single and 1529 double UCBT as reported to CIBMTR, following either a myeloablative (N = 1752) or reduced intensity conditioning (N = 759) for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoid leukemia, or myelodysplasia. The primary outcome was 2-year OS. Secondary outcomes included disease free survival, transplant related mortality (TRM), acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD), and GVHD free, relapse free survival (GRFS). ResultsFor 1705 adults, in univariate analysis, 2-year OS was 41.5% (99% CI, 37.6 to 45.3) for Whites, 36.1% (99% CI, 28.2 to 44.5) for Latinx, 45.8% (99% CI, 36.7 to 55.1) for Blacks, and 44.5% (99% CI, 33.6 to 55.6) for Asians. In multivariate analysis of adults, Latinx patients had inferior OS compared to black patients (p = .0005, HR 1.45, 99% CI 1.18 to 1.79). OS improved over time for all racial/ethnic groups. GVHD rates were comparable among the different racial/ethnic groups. In the 807 children, the 2-year OS in univariate analysis was 66.1% (99% CI, 59.7 to 72.2) for Whites, 57.1% (99%CI, 49 to 64.9) for Latinx, 46.8% (99%CI, 35.3 to 58.4) for Blacks, and 53.8% (99%CI, 32.7 to 74.2) for Asians. In multivariate analysis, no difference in OS was observed among racial/ethnic groups (p = .051). Grade III/IV acute GVHD was higher in Blacks compared with Whites (p = .0016, HR 2.25, 99% CI 1.36 to 3.74) and Latinx (p = .0016, HR 2.17, 99% CI 1.43 to 3.30). There was no survival advantage to receiving a UCB unit from a donor of similar race and ethnicity, for any racial/ethnic groups, for both children and adults.Black and Latinx adult patients were more likely to live in areas defined as high poverty. Patients from high poverty level areas had worse OS (p = .03), due to a higher rate of TRM (p=0.04). Educational level, and type of insurance did not impact overall survival, GVHD, TRM or other transplant outcomes. Children from areas with a higher poverty level had higher TRM, regardless of race and ethnicity (p = .02). Public health insurance, such as Medicaid, was also associated with a higher TRM (p = .02). However, poverty did not impact pediatric OS, DFS, or other post-transplant outcomes. ConclusionsOS for UCBT has improved over time. In adults, OS is comparable among Whites, Blacks, and Asians and lower for Latinx patients. In children, OS is comparable among Whites, Blacks, Latinx, and Asians, but Grade III/IV acute GVHD was higher in Black patients. There was no survival benefit to matching UCB unit and patient by race and ethnicity for adults and children.

Impact of Robotic Assistance on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival (OS) and surgical outcomes between conventional laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in women with type II endometrial cancer. We identified a large cohort of women who underwent hysterectomy for type II endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was to compare the OS of conventional laparoscopy versus RAL. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, 90-day mortality, rates of lymph node retrieval, rates of node positivity, and rates of conversion to laparotomy. Cohorts were compared and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine characteristics with statistically significant predictors of outcome. We identified 7168 patients with stage I-III type II endometrial cancer who had minimally invasive surgery as primary treatment between 2010 and 2014. A total of 5074 patients underwent RAL. Women who underwent RAL were less likely to have stage III disease (26.4% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.008) and had smaller primary tumors (4.6 vs. 4.1 cm, p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, there was no difference in OS between conventional laparoscopy and RAL. With regard to postoperative outcomes, RAL was associated with a decreased risk for conversion to laparotomy (2.7% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), a shorter hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.001), a decreased 90-day mortality (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.004), and an increased number of lymph nodes sampled (14 vs. 12, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the use of RAL was independently associated with a reduced rate of conversion to laparotomy. In conclusion, there was no difference in OS between conventional laparoscopy and RAL in type II endometrial cancer in a large retrospective cohort of patients from the NCDB. RAL was associated with a decreased risk of conversion to laparotomy.

The effect of BMI on survival outcome of breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The main goal of the present research is to explore the potential link of body mass index (BMI) with different survival metrics in breast cancer patients. Our aim is to offer the latest and most thorough meta-analysis, assessing the strength and reliability of the connection that BMI has with prognostic indicators in this disease. As of January 2024, we conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Our search aimed to identify studies examining BMI as an exposure factor, with breast cancer patients constituting the study population, and utilizing adjusted hazard ratio (HR) as the data type of interest. The evidence synthesis incorporated a total of 61 eligible articles involving 201,006 patients. Being underweight posed a risk factor for overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients compared to normal weight (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.35; P = 0.08). Overweight or obesity, in comparison to normal weight, was a risk factor for OS (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.14-1.23; P < 0.00001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.13; P < 0.00001), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22; P = 0.03), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.26; P < 0.00001), but not for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.10; P = 0.33). Notably, in subgroup analyses, overweight patients achieved prolonged PFS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99; P = 0.04), and compared to the obese population, the overweight cohort exhibited a significant difference in OS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.16; P < 0.00001) and DFS (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.10; P = 0.0004), with a considerably stronger association. Furthermore, compared to HER- patients, HER + patients exhibited a greater predictive value for OS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37; P = 0.0004), RFS (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.64; P < 0.00001), and DFS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17; P = 0.003). The results of our meta-analysis reveal a notable association between BMI and various survival measures in breast cancer prognosis. These findings provide a solid basis for predicting breast cancer outcomes and implementing more effective therapeutic approaches.

Effect of body mass index on survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The search for relevant literature was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the final search date being October 4, 2023. We utilized the weighted mean differences (WMDs), risk ratios (RRs), or Hazard ratios (HRs) as the metric for effect sizes, which were accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 9 studies were included for analysis. The results indicated that non-obese patients with mCRC undergoing treatment with bevacizumab experienced a reduced overall survival (OS) at the six-month compared to their obese counterparts (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.00, p = 0.047). Furthermore, no significant differences in one-year, two-year, and five-year OS, as well as PFS and median OS, were observed between obese and non-obese mCRC patients undergoing treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. These findings suggest that obesity may play a role in the short-term OS of patients with mCRC undergoing bevacizumab treatment. The clinical implications of these findings underscore the importance of considering patients' BMI in the context of mCRC care. This study may also help guide personalized treatment strategies and further research into the interplay between obesity, treatment efficacy, and patient survival in mCRC. However, further investigation is warranted to substantiate the findings of this study.

Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma with visceral metastases.

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with visceral metastases when classified into synchronous and metachronous metastases. Of 957 cases of de novo mUC treated between 2008 and 2023, 374 with visceral metastases were analyzed. Cases were classified into OMD with up to three metastatic lesions and polymetastatic disease (PMD), and into synchronous and metachronous metastases. The clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) for each group were analyzed. Overall, 196 (52.4%) had synchronous metastasis and 178 (47.6%) had metachronous metastasis. Median OS for synchronous metastases was significantly shorter than for metachronous metastases (12.1 months vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.011). Among the synchronous metastases, 48 (24.5%) were OMD and 148 (75.6%) were PMD. There was no significant difference in OS between the OMDs and PMDs (median 14.9 months vs. 11.7 months, p = 0.32), and only decreased albumin level was identified as a significant predictor of poor OS. Among the metachronous metastases, 64 (36.0%) were OMD and 114 (64.0%) were PMD. There was no significant difference in OS between the OMD and PMD (median 21.2 months vs. 15.0 months, p = 0.35), and no significant predictors of poor OS were identified. For mUC with visceral metastases, the timing of metastasis appearance was associated with prognosis, with synchronous metastases being a poorer prognostic factor compared to metachronous metastases. There was no prognostic difference between OMD and PMD with visceral metastases when classified into synchronous or metachronous metastases.

Evaluation of pathologic response and surgical safety of total neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer in a real-world setting

BackgroundPerioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the potential benefit of extending therapy before surgery remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without immune checkpoint blockade. MethodsA cohort of 174 patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from October 2021 to March 2024 in the real-world setting were included in this study. Among these patients, 101 were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and 73 were treated with perioperative neoadjuvant therapy (PNT). We compared the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, ypN0 rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with pCR or ypN0. ResultsCompared with the PNT group, the patients in the TNT group were more frequently treated with intensive chemotherapy with triplets + immunotherapy. Apart from this, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.8% vs 12.3%), ypN0 (49.5% vs 38.4%), RFS, OS, and postoperative complications (27.7% vs 26.0%) between the TNT and PNT groups. Older age, diffuse type, and stable disease/progressive disease based on clinical efficacy evaluation were independently associated with non-pCR. Stable disease/progressive disease, linitis plastica, and poor differentiation were independently associated with ypN+. Neither the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles nor the specific regimens were associated with pCR or ypN0. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving total gastrectomy, there were still no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.7% vs 2.6%), ypN0 (43.8% vs 39.5%), and postoperative complications (45.8% vs 36.8%) between the 2 groups. ConclusionAlthough TNT did not increase the postoperative complication rate, it also did not provide any additional short-term benefits compared with PNT for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

Carbon-ion radiotherapy alone vs. standard dose photon radiation with carbon-ion radiotherapy boost for high-grade gliomas: a retrospective study

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the survival outcome and side effects in patients with primary high-grade glioma (HGG) who received carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) alone or as a boost strategy after photon radiation (photon + CIRTboost).Patients and methodsThirty-four (34) patients with histologically confirmed HGG and received CIRT alone or Photon + CIRTboost, with concurrent temozolomide between 2020.03–2023.08 in Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, China were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and acute and late toxicities were analyzed and compared.ResultsEight WHO grade 3 and 26 grade 4 patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS in the CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups were 15 and 19 months respectively for all HGG cases, and 15 and 17.5 months respectively for grade 4 cases. The median OS in the CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups were 28 and 31 months respectively for all HGG cases, and 21 and 19 months respectively for grade 4 cases. No significant difference in these survival outcomes was observed between the CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups. Only grade 1 acute toxicities were observed in CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups. CIRT alone group had a significantly lower ratio of acute toxicities compared to Photon + CIRTboost (3/18 vs. 9/16, p = 0.03). No significant difference in late toxicities was observed.ConclusionBoth CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost with concurrent temozolomide are safe, without significant differences in PFS and OS in HGG patients. It is meaningful to explore whether dose escalation of CIRTboost might improve survival outcomes of HGG patients in future randomized trials.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (AG regimen) combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). MethodsData of 52 patients with advanced PC who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China) between August 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, patients were divided into two groups, including 27 patients in the chemotherapy group (AG regimen) and 25 patients in the combined treatment group (AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The survival curves of the two groups were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors influencing prognosis. ResultsThe median OS and PFS in the combined treatment group were significantly longer than those in the chemotherapy group (OS, 12.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.005; PFS, 5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (32.0 % vs. 25.9 %, P = 0.629), and DCR in the combined treatment group was significantly better than that in the chemotherapy group (84.0 % vs. 59.3 %, P = 0.049). Grade 1–2 adverse reactions were predominant in both groups, and no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred. ConclusionCompared with chemotherapy alone, AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors exhibited to have a higher efficacy for the first-line treatment of advanced PC, and the adverse reactions were also controllable.

Survival of patients with lymph node versusbone versus visceral metastases according to CHAARTED/LATITUDE criteria in the era of intensified combination therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

The first approvals of novel systemic therapies within recent years for metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) were mainly based on improved overall survival (OS) and time to castration resistance (ttCRPC) in mHSPC patients stratified according to CHAARTED low (LV) versus high volume (HV) and LATITUDE low (LR) versus high-risk (HR) disease. Relying on our institutional tertiary-care database we identified all mHSPC stratified according to CHAARTED LV versus HV, LATITUDE LR versus HR and the location of the metastatic spread (lymph nodes (M1a) versus bone (M1b) versus visceral/others (M1c) metastases. OS and ttCRPC analyses, as well as Cox regression models were performed according to different metastatic categories. Of 451 mHSPC, 14% versus 27% versus 48% versus 12% were classified as M1a LV versus M1b LV versus M1b HV versus M1c HV with significant differences in median OS: 95 versus 64 versus 50 versus 46 months (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models HV M1b (Hazard Ratio: 2.4, p = 0.03) and HV M1c (Hazard Ratio: 3.3, p < 0.01) harbored significant worse than M1a LV mHSPC. After stratification according to LATITUDE criteria, also significant differences between M1a LR versus M1b LR versus M1b HR versus M1c HR mHSPC patients were observed (p < 0.01) with M1b HR (Hazard Ratio: 2.7, p = 0.03) and M1c HR (Hazard Ratio: 3.5, p < 0.01), as predictor for worse OS. In comparison between HV M1b and HV M1c, as well as HR M1b versus HR M1c no differences in ttCRPC or OS were observed. Significant differences exist between different metastatic patterns of HV and LV and HR and LR criteria. Best prognosis is observed within M1a LV and LR mHSPC patients.