Difference In Overall Survival Research Articles

The Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

To report the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with bevacizumab plus anti-PD-1 (BP1) or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors (BPL) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a first-line treatment for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). In this retrospective study, patients with initially uHCC received either BP1-HAIC or BPL-HAIC as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 136 patients with initially uHCC received triple combination therapy, with 76 in the BP1-HAIC group and 60 in the BPL-HAIC group. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-13.7 months), and the median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.3- not reached). Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in PFS (HR, 0.91, P = 0.69) or OS (HR, 0.71, P = 0.31) between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. The ORR was 46.3% per RECIST v1.1 and 66.9% per mRECIST, with a DCR of 83.1% under both criteria. Common adverse events (AEs) included hypoalbuminemia and elevated aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, with 5.1% (7/136) experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor number and BCLC stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor number for PFS. Triple combination therapy demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy and tumor response in initially uHCC. No notable differences in outcomes were observed between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. AEs were manageable in clinical practice.

First-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia: immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag versus haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a multicenter prospective study.

Matched-related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the preferred first-line option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients aged <40 years even in the era of eltrombopag (EPAG). However, there has not been any direct comparison between immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus EPAG (IST + EPAG) and haploidentical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) as first-line therapy. This study prospectively compared the efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Haplo-HSCT (n = 147) and IST + EPAG (n = 121) as first-line treatment for patients with SAA. The results showed that 86.3% of patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 24.1% of patients in the IST + EPAG group achieved normal complete blood count (CBC) (P < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment. The time to achieve transfusion independence and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 109/L were shorter in the Haplo-HSCT group than in the IST + EPAG group (P < 0.05). In the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.4 ± 2.4% and 82.8 ± 3.1% (P = 0.017), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 69.4 ± 4.2% and 81.6 ± 3.2% (P = 0.002), respectively. Similar results were observed in patients with <40 years of age. Among patients with ≥40 years of age, there was no difference in 3-year OS (88.6 ± 4.8% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.517) between the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT groups, whereas 3-year FFS was lower in the IST + EPAG (58.7 ± 7.5% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.043). Subgroup analysis for populations aged <40 years indicated that SAA benefited more from IST + EPAG, and very SAA (vSAA) benefited more from Haplo-HSCT. Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST + EPAG (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line Haplo-HSCT was associated with normal CBC at 6 months, better FFS and led to a better HRQoL (P < 0.001). In summary, the IST + EPAG achieved better OS for <40 years SAA patients, while the Haplo-HSCT accelerated hematopoietic recovery and HRQoL, achieved better FFS even for those <40 years vSAA and ≥40 years patients.

Association between Early Minimal Residual Disease Detected by Flow Cytometry and Prognosis in Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinical Retrospective Study

To investigate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC) in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after induction chemotherapy. A retrospective study was conducted on 97 pediatric patients initially diagnosed with AML at Wuhan Children's Hospital from August 2015 to December 2022. The study analyzed the results of MRD detection using MFC after the first and second cycles of induction chemotherapy, and its association with prognosis were analyzed. Following the first cycle of induction treatment, 57 of the 97 patients tested positive for MRD (MRD1+ , 58.8%). Subsequently, 19 patients remained MRD positive (MRD2+ , 19.6%) after the second cycle of induction treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of the 37 (64.9%) MRD1+ patients who underwent transplantation was significantly higher than that of the 20 (35.1%) MRD1+ patients who did not undergo transplantation (84.6% vs 40.0%, P =0.0001). Among the 35 MRD1+ MRD2- patients, the 3-year OS rate of the 25 children who underwent transplantation was higher than that of the 10 children who did not undergo transplantation (87.2% vs 70.0%, P =0.3229). The 3-year OS rate of the 19 MRD1+ MRD2+ patients was lower than that of the 35 MRD1+ MRD2- patients (57.4% vs 81.8%, P =0.059). In the 19 MRD2+ patients, the 3-year OS rate of the 12 children who underwent transplantation was significantly higher than that of the 7 children who did not undergo transplantation (80.8% vs 14.3%, P =0.0007). There was no significant difference in 3-year OS between the 12 MRD1+ MRD2+ patients and 25 MRD1+ MRD2- patients, both treated with transplantation (80.8% vs 87.2%, P =0.8868). In those not treated with transplantation, the 7 MRD1+ MRD2+ patients had a significantly lower 3-year OS compared with the 10 MRD1+ MRD2- patients (14.3% vs 70.7%, P =0.0114). Further multivariate analysis indicated that MRD2 positivity and transplantation were both independent prognostic factors (P =0.031, 0.000), while MRD1 positivity was not significantly associated with the overall prognosis of 97 patients (P =0.902). MRD positivity following the second cycle of induction chemotherapy is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcomes in children with AML. MRD2 positivity indicates a poorer prognosis and can help to identify the candidates requiring transplantation. MRD2 positivity is not a contraindication for transplantation in pediatric patients, and early transplantation significantly improves the prognosis of high-risk patients.

The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on clinical outcomes for locally advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: An incidence-based retrospective cohort study.

108 Background: Prior studies show that socioeconomic status impacts hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. However, these have used larger geographic areas such as zip codes or counties for assessment. Using a statewide cancer registry the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a granular measure of socioeconomic deprivation (SED), was used to assess receipt of treatment and overall survival (OS) for locally advanced and metastatic HCC. Methods: The incidence-based Florida Cancer Data System was used to identify stage III/IV HCC patients diagnosed from 2007-2015. The ADI was used to measure SED and is a validated dataset that ranks neighborhoods (census block groups) from 1-100 (higher scores = higher deprivation) based on income, education, housing, and other socioeconomic factors. Demographic, tumor, and treatment variables were assessed using descriptive statistics, regression plots, and survival analysis. Chemotherapeutic treatment (CT) included receipt of chemotherapy and/or chemoembolization. Results: The study identified 2,534 eligible patients. Males comprised 80.6% of the cohort. The median age was 63 years. By SED quartile, there were significant differences by age, race, insurance, and receipt of chemotherapy (p&lt;0.05) but no difference by gender, ethnicity, stage, or survival. Overall, 39.1% received chemotherapeutic treatment. However, 41.0% of the lowest-deprivation patients received CT compared to 32.1% in the highest-deprivation cohort (p&lt;0.01). After adjustment for potential confounders, the lowest deprivation quartile had increased odds of CT compared to the highest deprivation quartile (OR 1.47; 95% CI,1.15-1.87). The median OS for the cohort was 4.0 months and was 4.6 and 3.3 months, respectively, for the lowest and highest deprivation quartiles (p&lt;0.01). For patients who received and did not receive CT, the median OS was 8.0 and 2.2 months, respectively (p&lt;0.01). However, there was no difference in median OS by SED for those who received CT (p=0.14). Conclusions: In an incidence-based, statewide cancer registry, the median OS for locally advanced and metastatic HCC remains poor and most patients do not receive CT. While there were differences in receipt of CT by SED, when patients did receive CT, median OS was similar across SED quartiles. These data suggest that SED may impact receipt of treatment and efforts are needed to understand and address treatment disparities. Lowest Deprivation Low Deprivation High Deprivation Highest Deprivation p-Value N=624 N=650 N=589 N=629 Chemotherapeutic treatment 0.001 No 347 (55.6%) 345 (53.1%) 339 (57.6%) 411 (65.3%) Yes 256 (41.0%) 283 (43.5%) 235 (39.9%) 202 (32.1%) Unknown 21 (3.4%) 22 (3.4%) 15 (2.5%) 15 (2.6%) Vital Status 0.93 Alive 41 (5.7%) 44 (5.9%) 43 (6.0%) 44 (6.5%) Dead 682 (94.3%) 695 (94.1%) 673 (94.0%) 632 (93.5%)

Impact of docetaxel plus ramucirumab therapy on interstitial lung disease in recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Few studies have examined the safety and efficacy of docetaxel/ramucirumab (DOC/RAM) therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) complicated by interstitial lung disease (ILD). Given the potential of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors to prevent drug-induced pneumonia, we aimed to clarify the role of this therapy in NSCLC with ILD. This retrospective observational study evaluated the incidence of ILD in stage IV NSCLC patients receiving DOC/RAM therapy at our institution, stratified by ILD status. We also assessed the efficacy of this treatment. The primary objective was to investigate the incidence of ILD, while secondary objectives included evaluating the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), stratified by ILD status. Among patients with pre-existing ILD, 7 out of 28 (25%) developed DOC/RAM-induced interstitial pneumonia, while none of the 40 patients without pre-existing ILD developed this condition (P<0.001). Comparing historical controls (DOC only) with the DOC/RAM group, RAM did not significantly alter the incidence of interstitial pneumonia (P=0.33). There were no significant differences in ORR, PFS, or OS between patients with and without ILD. Subgroup analysis of smokers showed a non-significant trend toward worse survival in those with pre-existing ILD (P=0.20). DOC/RAM therapy significantly increased the incidence of interstitial pneumonia in NSCLC patients with pre-existing ILD but did not significantly affect efficacy outcomes such as ORR, PFS, or OS.

Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Less Than 4 Metastatic Sites May Benefit from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge by Reshaping Tumor Microenvironment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has prolonged survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) as first-line treatment. However, whether ICI rechallenge could bring survival benefit to patients with ES-SCLC following its failure as first-line treatment remains unknown. Therefore, we aim to address the issue and identify the cohort of patients that may derive such benefit. Patients with ES-SCLC from both the IMpower133 study and Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (shanzhong cohort) who failed first-line ICI were included. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS). Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors affecting survival. Tumor immune cell infiltration was evaluated by the CIBERSORT algorithm and detected by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF). A total of 125 ES-SCLC patients undergoing atezolizumab and 161 patients undergoing ICI as first-line treatment were recruited from IMpower133 and shanzhong cohort. Those receiving ICI rechallenge had a longer OS than those without in IMpower133 (P = 0.08) and shanzhong cohort (P = 0.013). In IMpower133 cohort, subgroup analyses found that patients with <4 metastatic sites derived more survival benefit from atezolizumab (P = 0.008). For patients with ES-SCLC harboring <4 metastatic sites, there was significant OS difference between atezolizumab versus non-atezolizumab as retreatment (P = 0.036). Moreover, for ES-SCLC patients with <4 metastatic sites, atezolizumab improved survival compared with non-atezolizumab (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.457; 95% CI: 0.256-0.817; P = 0.008). These findings were confirmed in shanzhong cohort. Those harboring <4 metastatic sites had fewer M2 macrophage and more CD4 naïve T cells infiltration, which was further confirmed by mIF of ES-SCLC samples from shanzhong cohort. Our study provides rationale for ICI rechallenge among ES-SCLC patients with <4 metastatic sites, suggesting beneficial outcome by reshaping TME.

Ten-year survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery vs. open major lung resection for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a large cohort study in China.

Despite the widespread adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for major lung resection, the 10-year long-term survival outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with VATS compared with open major lung resection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of VATS vs. open major lung resection for NSCLC. The perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of p-stage I-III NSCLC patients who underwent major lung resection via VATS vs. open major lung resection in the Western China Lung Cancer Database (WCLCD) between May 2006 and June 2018 were studied using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 10,167 patients who underwent surgery for lung malignancies, 6,405 patients with stage I-III NSCLC were included in the study, including 4,224 in the VATS group and 2,181 in the open group. PSM resulted in 1,487 patients in both the VATS and open groups. The patients were matched by patient demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), tumor histology and TNM stage. Compared with open surgery, major lung resection via VATS resulted in less blood loss (median: 50 vs. 100 mL, P<0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.6±6.0 vs. 8.6±4.9 days, P<0.001) but higher total hospital costs (52.5±21.2 vs. 45.0±16.4 kRMB, P<0.001). The matched cohort showed that patients who underwent major lung resection via VATS had better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than did patients who underwent major lung resection via open surgery (5-year survival: 64.9% vs. 57.7%, P<0.001; 5-year RFS: 50.3% vs. 45.3%, P=0.003). Patients who underwent VATS had a better 10-year OS rate (47.8% vs. 42.6%). According to the subgroup analysis, patients with stage II NSCLC who underwent major lung resection via VATS had better OS and RFS (OS: P<0.001; RFS: P=0.004), while there were no significant differences in OS or RFS between stage I and III NSCLC patients. Major lung resection via the VATS should be the preferred surgical option for stage I-III NSCLC patients due to its superior long-term survival outcome and advantages of less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stays.

Omission of Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Evaluation of PROSPECT in a National Database.

The PROSPECT trial showed noninferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with selective chemoradiation (CRT) versus CRT alone. However, trial results are often difficult to reproduce with real-world data. Pathologic outcomes and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by neoadjuvant strategy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients in a national database. The 2012-2020 National Cancer Database was queried for clinical T2N1 and T3N0-1 rectal adenocarcinoma patients with definitive resection. Patients were categorized by neoadjuvant treatment with CRT alone, NAC alone, and NAC with CRT. Outcomes included R0 resection, pathologic complete response (PCR), and OS. Of 18 892 patients, 16 126 (85.4%) received CRT, 1018 (5.4%) NAC, and 1748 (9.3%) NAC with CRT. Patients with NAC alone or NAC with CRT were more likely to have stage-III disease, private insurance, and academic facility treatment (all p < 0.001). NAC alone had lower adjusted odds of an R0 resection (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.54-0.95) and PCR (OR 0.77; 95%CI 0.64-0.93). NAC with CRT demonstrated improved OS (HR 0.71; 95%CI 0.61-0.82), with no difference between NAC and CRT alone. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no differences in OS were seen. Patients who received NAC alone had worse pathologic outcomes. NAC had similar OS to CRT and NAC with CRT showed improved OS.

Outcomes and Complications of Image-Guided Percutaneous Tumour Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at the Irish National Liver Transplant Centre.

Background: Image-guided tumour ablation is a minimally invasive treatment for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study reviews the complications and long term outcomes in patients treated at a tertiary referral centre. Methods: Retrospective study. All patients with HCC who underwent microwave ablation (MWA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2022 were identified. Treatment response of target lesion, complications, and survival were recorded. Results: One hundred seventy ablations were performed in 118 patients; 70% MWA, 30% RFA. Median radiological follow-up 21 months (range 3-107). Follow-up imaging was reported using LI-RADS and mRECIST. At first follow-up imaging, 94 patients had complete response (primary efficacy rate 80.3%) while 19.7% (n = 23) had residual disease. Fifteen of these had repeat ablation; 10 had complete response (secondary efficacy rate 85.6%). By end of study duration, 70.5% (n = 79) achieved sustained local complete response from single ablation without documented recurrence. 14.3% (n = 16) required more than one ablation of target lesion. Overall, 84.8% (n = 95) demonstrated long term local complete response to ablation. Complication occurred in 5.9% (n = 10); 40.0% Grade I, 40.0% Grade II, 10.0% Grade III, 10.0% Grade IV as per the CIRSE Classification. 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 97%, 68%, and 61% respectively. Mean OS was 5.3 years (median 4.7). No difference in OS (P = .7) or local progression free survival (P = .5) between patients treated with MWA versus RFA. Conclusion: This study demonstrates excellent long-term response to TA, with acceptable complication profile. No difference in survival between RFA versus MWA.

Outcomes of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Following Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment.

Background Watchful waiting and non-operative management of patients with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancers is an emerging practice now, especially in patients whose surgery would require permanent stoma. Methodology This is a retrospective study of patients presenting to the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt from January 2005 to December 2019 with pathologically proven locally advanced rectal cancer who had a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment. Patients who underwent surgery after achieving complete clinical response and patients who were kept under watchful waiting were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results Of the 51 patients identified, 31 (61%) went to surgery, and 20 (39%) were kept under watchful waiting. There was no difference in five-year OS between both groups (65% for both, p = 0.57). Five-year DFS for the watchful waiting group was 68% versus 62% for the surgery group (p = 0.75). Five-year LRFS was 100% in the watchful waiting group versus 83% in the surgery group (p = 0.15). Conclusions Watchful waiting after a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer is feasible without compromising disease-related outcomes, especially in patients with distal rectal cancers requiring permanent stoma after surgery. However, further prospective validation is needed.

Is radiotherapy still the optimal initial choice for patients with early-stage low-grade follicular lymphoma in the modern era? A population-based study.

Despite radiotherapy (RT) is recognized as preferred initial therapy for early-stage low-grade follicular lymphoma (FL) by many international practice guidelines, the medical oncologist has improperly underutilized RT, and diverse management strategies, including systemic therapy (ST), combined modality (CM) and watch and wait (WW), are still used. Except survival outcomes, previous studies concerned little about the treatment-related toxicity, which is also important factor in choosing initial management strategy, especially second primary malignancies (SPMs). The aim of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) and the SPMs risk between different management strategies, which can provide guidance for the choice of optimal initial management strategy. Data was acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Finally, A total 10,900 patients were identified, in which 930 cases developed SPMs. The use of radiotherapy (RT) has remained consistently low, with a utilization rate of around 20%, while most patients have received watchful waiting (WW) and systemic therapy (ST). In the rituximab era, multivariate analysis indicated that RT exhibited significantly superior OS and did not increase SPMs risk in comparison with ST and WW. At the same time, although there were no significant differences in OS between CM and RT, RT had significantly lower SPMs risk in comparison with CM. The use of RT improved the OS and did not increase the SPMs risk in comparison with other management strategies. Considering the low application rate of RT, oncologists should emphasize and increase the use of RT as an initial management strategy in patients with early-stage low-grade FL.

Association of Hospital Volume With Quality Care Outcomes Following Minor and Major Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer.

Regionalizing hepatic resections to high-volume hospitals (HVH) has improved outcomes, yet widened disparities in access. We sought to evaluate the association of hospital volume with quality care outcomes and overall survival (OS) between minor and major hepatectomy for primary liver cancer. The National Cancer Database identified patients with primary liver cancer who underwent minor/major hepatectomy (2009-2019). HVHs were defined by the top quartile in annual case volume (vs. the bottom three quartiles). Quality care outcomes (time to resection, margin status, length of stay, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality) and OS were assessed using multivariable regression. Overall, 6,988 patients underwent minor hepatectomy and 4880 major hepatectomy. No differences in quality care outcomes or OS based on hospital volume for minor hepatectomy were observed (all p > 0.05). Treatment at HVHs for major hepatectomy was associated with decreased odds of 30-day and 90-day mortality events (all p < 0.05). Median OS was 40.2 months [IQR 21.7-66.6] at HVHs versus 33.5 [IQR 17.0-58.7] at low-volume hospitals which remained independently predictive of improved OS on multivariable analysis (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93). These results support regionalization to HVHs for major hepatectomy; however, minor hepatectomy can be safely performed at hospitals regardless of volume.

Dexamethasone dose intensity does not impact outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a secondary SWOG analysis

AbstractDexamethasone is a key component of induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), despite common toxicities, including hyperglycemia and insomnia. In the randomized ECOG E4A03 trial, dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly was associated with lower mortality than higher doses. However, the performance of dexamethasone dose reductions below this threshold with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NDMM has not been fully characterized. We conducted a secondary pooled analysis of the SWOG 0777 and SWOG 1211 studies of NDMM, which used lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone, with or without bortezomib, and with or without elotuzumab. The planned dexamethasone intensity was 40 to 60 mg weekly in all arms. Patients were categorized into FD-DEX (full-dose dexamethasone maintained throughout induction) or LD-DEX (lowered-dose dexamethasone or discontinuation; only permitted for grade 3+ toxicities per both study protocols). Of the 541 evaluated patients, the LD-DEX group comprised 373 patients (69%). There were no differences in PFS or OS between the FD-DEX and LD-DEX groups, which were balanced in terms of age, stage, and performance status. Predictors of PFS and OS in the multivariate models were treatment arm, age ≥70 years, and thrombocytopenia. FD-DEX did not significantly improve either outcome. Our study suggests that dexamethasone dose reductions are common in multiple myeloma, even within clinical trials. Given the many toxicities and unclear benefits of dexamethasone in the era of modern treatment regimens, dexamethasone dose reduction during NDMM induction warrants further prospective studies. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00644228 and NCT01668719.

Recurrence pattern of glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

To evaluate recurrence patterns of and survival outcomes in glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). We retrospectively examined 91 patients with glioblastoma treated with either IMRT (n = 60) or 3D-CRT (n = 31) between January 2013 and December 2019. Magnetic resonance imaging showing tumor recurrence and planning computed tomography scans were fused for analyzing recurrence patterns categorized as in-field, marginal, and out-of-field based on their relation to the initial radiation field. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.9 months, with no significant difference between the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months, with no significant difference between the groups. Patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) had higher OS and PFS than those who underwent less extensive surgery. Among 78 relapse cases, 67 were of in-field; 5, marginal; and 19, out-of-field recurrence. Among 3D-CRT-treated cases, 24 were of in-field; 1, marginal; and 9, out-of-field recurrence. Among IMRT-treated cases, 43 were of in-field; 4, marginal; and 10, out-of-field recurrence. In partial tumor removal or biopsy cases, out-of-field recurrence was less frequent in the IMRT (16.2%) than in the 3D-CRT (36.3%) group, with marginal significance (p = 0.079). IMRT and 3D-CRT effectively managed glioblastoma with no significant differences in OS and PFS. The survival benefit with GTR underscored the importance of maximal surgical resection. The reduced rate of out-of-field recurrence in IMRT-treated patients with partial resection highlights its potential utility in cases with unfeasible complete tumor removal.

Abstract A087: Clinical outcomes in Black patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib

Abstract Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are present in about 15% of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases in the U.S. The FLAURA study, in which the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Osimertinib demonstrated a median PFS of 18.9 months, set the current standard in the U.S. for front-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, Black patients were greatly underrepresented in the FLAURA study (&amp;lt;1% of trial population) and two retrospective single-institution studies suggest inferior survival in Black patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with TKIs versus (vs.) other races. Research is needed using large real-world cohorts to evaluate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) in Black patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC to determine whether they derive comparable benefit from Osimertinib as other races. Methods: The nationwide Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record (EHR)-derived de-identified database was used to analyze data from 1503 patients with advanced NSCLC bearing an EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received front-line Osimertinib. The de-identified data originated from 280 US cancer clinics (∼800 sites of care). Patients were stratified by race (Black vs. White) and characteristics were compared using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and t-tests. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated rwPFS (based on clinician documentation of progression) and OS in months (m). Differences in survival were assessed between Black and White patients using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models that adjusted for age, gender, EGFR subtype, histology, diagnosis year, smoking history, performance status, insurance status, and socioeconomic index. Results: In our cohort, comprised of 179 Black and 1324 White patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, median age and percentage with a smoking history did not differ by race. However, Black patients were more likely to be female (74.3% vs. 66.4%, p=0.03), possess an exon 19 deletion tumor (74.3% vs. 58.3%, p&amp;lt;0.001) or be in a low socioeconomic index category (30.2% vs. 8.7%, p&amp;lt;0.001) than White patients. Median rwPFS did not significantly differ between Black and White patients treated with Osimertinib (15.1 m vs. 14.1 m, HR 0.91, p=0.39). Similarly, no significant difference in OS was observed among Black patients treated with Osimertinib as compared to Whites (29.2 m vs. 32.5 m, HR 1.07, p=0.57). Conclusion: This real-world analysis of one of the largest cohorts of Black patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC to date, did not observe differences in rwPFS and OS as compared to White patients following front-line Osimertinib therapy. Efforts should be made to ensure all patients receive mutational testing upfront so they can receive optimal first line therapy. Citation Format: Neel Belani, Farsha Rizwan, Jill Hasler, Jessica Bauman, Khadijah Mitchell, Hossein Borghaei, Joseph N Bodor. Clinical outcomes in Black patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A087.

Abstract A070: Real world treatment patterns and patient outcomes of neuroendocrine tumors: A single institution study

Abstract Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare and diverse, with increasing incidence but poorly understood prognostic variables. While African American or Black patients typically have poorer outcomes across various tumor types, this is not well documented for NETs. Our study aimed to investigate racial disparities in NET outcomes. Patients who had a diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor between 2014 and 2022 were identified and analyzed in this retrospective chart analysis, with race determined as Caucasian (CA) or Black African American (BAA). Histology was stratified as high grade or those without high grade histology. Grade of tumor was identified as well differentiated, moderately or poorly differentiated, and other/unknown. Log-rank test was conducted to compare the survival curves between CA and AA groups. Cox proportional hazards model was built to adjust for potential confounders, including age at diagnosis and gender (if applicable) while comparing racial disparities. The CA vs. AA hazard ratio (HR) and p-values were calculated. Among the 655 patients analyzed, 63.4% were Caucasian (CA) and 36.6% were Black African American (BAA). The average age at diagnosis across the cohort was 61.5 years. The gender distribution was approximately equal, with 50.2% females and 49.8 % males. High-grade histology was identified in 114 patients, of whom 28.1% were BAA and 71.9% were CA. Within this subgroup, males were more prevalent than females (61.4% vs. 38.6%). Overall survival (OS) for CA patients with high-grade histology was 57.4 months, compared to 67.5 months for BAA patients (p=0.7). Additionally, no statistically significant difference in OS was observed between males and females with high-grade histology (60.8 months vs. 68.1 months, respectively; p=0.3). Analysis of tumor grade revealed that well- differentiated tumors were present in 122 patients (18.63%). Among these patients, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between BAA and CA. The primary tumor site was the colon in 89 patients (13.6%), with 77.5% being CA and 22.5% BAA. Pancreatic tumors were present in 119 patients (18.2%), with 72% being CA and 28% BAA. The next most common primary sites were the small intestine (24.9%), rectum (17.6%), and stomach (9.9%). In comparing survival outcomes between racial groups, CA patients had a significantly worse OS (76.9 months) compared to BAA patients (84.6 months) (p=0.05). Regardless of race, females demonstrated better survival (84.2 months) compared to males (75.7 months) (p=0.04). In our retrospective analysis, Caucasian (CA) patients had worse overall survival (OS) than Black African American (BAA) patients, likely due to a higher proportion of CA patients with high- grade histology and primary tumors in the colon. Females showed better OS than males across all subtypes. The reasons for the higher incidence of worse histology in CA patients are unclear. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings, understand racial disparities, and develop strategies to mitigate them. Citation Format: Radhika Gutta, Wan-Ting su, Ruicond She, Muhammad Shahid, Gazala Khan. Real world treatment patterns and patient outcomes of neuroendocrine tumors: A single institution study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A070.

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Immune Monotherapy versus Immunotheray Combined with Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients Aged 75 Years and Above with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

The malignant tumor that has the highest global morbidity and death rate is lung cancer, which primarily affects the elderly. The therapy landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transformed with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of immune monotherapy and immunotheray combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC aged 75 years and above. This study retrospectively analyzed 111 patients with advanced NSCLC who were at least 75 years old and received treatment at the First or Fifth Medical Centers of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2018 to October 2022. These patients underwent first-line or second-line treatment, with 70 receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and 41 receiving immunotherapy alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the baseline characteristics of the patients, including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, and the number of treatment lines. The study endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety assessment. The median OS for the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group was 27.87 months, and the median PFS was 11.50 months. The median OS for the immune monotherapy group was 34.93 months, and the median PFS was 17.00 months. There were no significant differences in OS (P=0.722) and PFS (P=0.474) between the two groups, but a significant difference was observed in ORR (P=0.025). After PSM matching, each group comprised 27 patients. The median OS for the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group was 17.70 months, the median PFS was 8.97 months. The median OS for the immune monotherapy group was 17.87 months, and the median PFS was 11.53 months. No significant differences were observed in OS (P=0.635), PFS (P=0.878) and ORR (P=0.097). In terms of safety, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) before matching was 62.86% in the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group, which was higher than 41.46% in the immune monotherapy group (P=0.029), while there was no difference in the incidence of AEs of grade 3 or above between the two groups (P=0.221). After matching, AEs occurred in 17 (62.96%) patients in the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group and 13 (48.15%) in the immune monotherapy group. There were no significant differences in the overall incidence of AEs (P=0.273) or the incidence of grade 3 or above (P=0.299) between the two groups. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy does not significantly improve OS or PFS in patients with NSCLC aged 75 years and above when compared to immunotherapy alone, and this conclusion was further validated by the analysis after PSM. The safety assessment suggests that before matching, the incidence of AEs of any grade in the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group was higher. Still, the two groups had no difference in the incidence of AEs of grade 3 or above. Following matching, the tolerability of the treatment was similar in both groups. According to the safety assessment, the unique circumstances and course of treatment for geriatric patients with advanced NSCLC should be considered.

Racial disparities in receipt of radiation and brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients: Do they exist in a SEER-Medicare population?

ObjectivesTo evaluate if race is associated with disparities in receipt of radiation (RT) and outcomes for Medicare patients with cervical cancer who are candidates for primary radiation-chemotherapy. MethodsThis SEER-Medicare retrospective study included White and Black patients with stage IB1 through IVA squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma diagnosed 2000–2017 who were candidates for primary radiation-chemotherapy. Receipt of treatment by race and associated cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed using frequency distributions, chi squared, log rank, multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models, and multivariable logistic models. Results1038 patients (84.9 % White and 15.1 % Black) were included. 825 (79.5 %) received RT, and 601 (57.9 %) received brachytherapy (BT). Blacks were more likely to undergo RT than Whites (86.0 % vs. 78.3 %, p = 0.028) and had similar rates of BT (58.0 % vs. 57.9 %, p = 0.986). Median RT duration was 64.0 days (IQR 52.0, 75.0), and 276 (33.5 %) completed treatment in ≤ 56 days, with no differences by race (p = 0.488, 0.303, respectively). BT was more frequently provided at larger hospitals, National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, and teaching hospitals. When adjusted for covariates, no significant differences in RT, BT, or RT duration by race were identified. Median unadjusted OS was 3.58 years (95 % CI 2.92, 4.42) for White patients and 2.50 years (95 % CI 2.0, 5.25) for Black patients, with no differences in OS (HR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.75, 1.13) or CSS (HR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.86, 1.43). ConclusionsBlack Medicare patients with cervical cancer had greater receipt of RT than White patients, similar rates of BT, and no difference in survival.

Total versus Partial Pancreatectomy in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Arising from Multifocal or Diffuse Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasia - A Multicenter Observational Study.

To investigate the impact of total pancreatectomy (TP) on oncological outcomes for patients at high-risk of local recurrence or secondary progression in the remnant gland after partial pancreatectomy (PP) for IPMN-associated cancer. Major risk factors for invasive progression in the remnant gland include multifocality, diffuse main duct dilation, and the presence of invasive cancer. In these high-risk patients, a TP may be oncologically beneficial. However, current guidelines discourage TP, especially in elderly patients. This international multicenter study compares TP versus PP in patients with adenocarcinoma arising from multifocal or diffuse IPMN (2002-2022). Log-rank test and multivariable Cox-analysis with interaction analysis was performed to assess overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local-DFS. Of 359 included patients, 162 (45%) were treated with TP, whereas 197 (55%) underwent PP. Despite TP and PP having similar R0-rates (59% vs. 58%, P=0.866), patients undergoing a TP had significantly longer local-DFS compared to PP (P=0.039). However, no difference in OS was observed between the two surgical approaches (P=0.487). In a multivariable analysis, young age (optimal cut-off ≤63.6yrs) was associated with an OS benefit derived from TP (HR:0.44, 95%CI:0.22-0.89), whereas no significant difference was observed in elderly patients (HR:1.24, 95%CI:0.92-1.67, Pinteraction=0.007). Since overall, patients with diffuse or multifocal IPMN with an invasive component do not benefit from TP in terms of OS, the indication for TP may be individualized to young patients who have sufficient life expectancy to benefit from the prevention of secondary progression or local recurrence.

Prognostic value of ABO blood groups in upfront operated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

PurposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been shown to have a lower incidence in patients with blood group O. It is currently uncertain if patients with group O have a better prognosis after pancreatectomy. This study assessed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy based on ABO blood groups.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed including patients from two university centers. All consecutive head PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2016 were included. OS and DFS were compared between blood groups A, B, AB, and O using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.ResultsA total of 438 patients were included (215 women, median age 67). Pre- and intraoperative details were comparable between all subgroups. Median OS did not differ between the four blood groups (A: 23 months, 95% CI 18–28; B: 32, 95% CI 20–44; AB: 37, 95% CI 18–56 and O: 26, 95% CI 20–32, p = 0.192). Median DFS were also similar (A: 19 months, 95% CI 15–23; B: 26, 95% CI 19–33; AB: 35, 95% CI 15–55 and O: 22, 95% CI 15–29, p = 0.441). There was no OS difference between O and non-O groups (median: 26 months, 95% CI 20–33 vs. 25 months, 95% CI 20–30, p = 0.773). On multivariable analysis blood groups were not prognostic of OS. Only lymph node involvement, tumor differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors.ConclusionOS and DFS were similar between all four blood groups after pancreatoduodenectomy. Independent predictors of OS were associated with tumor characteristics and adjuvant treatment.