The Socioscientific Issues Approach (SIA) engages students to study and connect science, daily life and society in the community. While Design Thinking (DT) encourages students to understand the needs of the local community regarding real-life problems, and then apply the knowledge to generate ideas for solutions. The integration of PIS and PRB in STEM teaching and learning is rarely documented in the literature. Thus, this research aimed to examine the effects of integrating SIA an DT approaches in STEM education on entrepreneurial creative thinking among rural secondary school students. A comprehensive instructional module was meticulously designed to facilitate teachers in implementing the SIA-DT framework, aimed at augmenting entrepreneurial creative thinking skills among Form Four students. A quasi-experimental quantitative study was conducted on 267 Form Four students enrolled in rural secondary schools in Tawau, Sabah. These students were randomly assigned to three groups: i) Socioscientific Issue and Design Thinking Integration (SSA-DT, n=89), ii) Design Thinking Approach (DT, n=90), and iii) Traditional Approach (TRD, n=88). The Entrepreneurial Creative Thinking Test (ECTT) instrument was developed and applied to measure pre- and post-intervention levels of entrepreneurial creative thinking. Rigorous statistical analyses employing MANCOVA, ANCOVA, and Effect Size techniques were conducted. MANCOVA results revealed statistically significant effects across all instructional groups, indicating the effects of the interventions in fostering entrepreneurial creative thinking. Furthermore, ANCOVA analysis results indicated that the SSA-DT method significantly fosters entrepreneurial creative thinking, investigation constructs, new ideas, design, creation, and commercialization compared to the DT and TRD methods. These findings support the view that the SSA-DT module has a positive impact on cultivating entrepreneurial creative thinking among students.
Read full abstract