Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and ReviewsLanguage Shift or Changing Relationship?Douglas TaylorDouglas Taylor Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by International Journal of American Linguistics Volume 26, Number 2Apr., 1960 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/464567 Views: 11Total views on this site Citations: 31Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Albert Valdman REVIEW ARTICLE, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, no.0303 (Jul 2005).https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050199Emily Krasinski The development of past marking in a bilingual child and the punctual-nonpunctual distinction, First Language 15, no.4545 (Jul 2016): 239–276.https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379501504501Derek Bickerton The language bioprogram hypothesis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 173–188.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044149Lois Bloom A bioprogram for language: Not whether but how?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 190–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044150Matt Cartmill Innate grammars and the evolutionary presumption, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 191–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044162Chris Corne On the transmission of substratal features in creolisation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 191–192.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044174Richard F. Cromer Language acquisition: Genetically encoded instructions or a set of processing mechanisms?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 192–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044186Morris Goodman Are creole structures innate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 193–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044198M. Gopnik From pidgins to pigeons, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 194–195.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044204Norbert Hornstein Grades of nativism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 195–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044216Lyle Jenkins Pidgins, Creoles, and universal grammar, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 196–197.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044228Frank C. Keil Of pidgins and pigeons, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 197–198.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004423XDavid W. Lightfoot The relative richness of triggers and the bioprogram, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 198–199.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044241Alec Marantz Creolization: Special evidence for innateness?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 199–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044253Michael Maratsos How degenerate is the input to creoles and where do its biases come from?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 200–201.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044265John C. Marshall Pidgins are everywhere, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 201–201.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044277Richard P. Meier Sign as creole, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 201–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044289Salikoko S. Mufwene The language bioprogram hypothesis, creole studies, and linguistic theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 202–203.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044290Pieter Muysken Do creoles give insight into the human language faculty?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 203–204.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044307Rebecca Posner Creolization or linguistic change?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 204–205.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044319Peter A. Roberts Problems with similarities across creoles and the development of creole, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 205–206.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044320William J. Samarin Socioprogrammed linguistics, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 206–207.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044332Geoffrey Sampson Do Creoles prove what “ordinary” languages don't?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 207–208.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044344Pieter A. M. Seuren The bioprogram hypothesis: Facts and fancy, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 208–209.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044356Dan I. Slobin Child language and the bioprogram, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 209–210.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044368William S-Y. Wang Organum ex machina?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 210–211.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004437XEllen Woolford Why creoles won't reveal the properties of universal grammar, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 211–212.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044381Derek Bickerton Creole is still king, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 212–221.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044393Elizabeth Bates Bioprograms and the innateness hypothesis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, no.22 (Feb 2010): 188–190.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00073799Alexander Hull The Origins of New World French Phonology, <i>WORD</i> 24, no.1-31-3 (Jun 2015): 255–269.https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1968.11435530David DeCamp The Field of Creole Language Studies, Latin American Research Review 3, no.33 (Oct 2022): 25–46.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100028922