AbstractThe interfacial region of a model multilayer coating system on an aluminium substrate has been investigated by high‐resolution time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS). Employing ultra‐low‐angle microtomy (ULAM), the interface between a poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVdF)‐based topcoat and a poly(urethane) (PU)‐based primer ‘buried’ >20 µm below the PVdF topcoat's air/coating surface was exposed. Imaging ToF‐SIMS and subsequent post‐processing extraction of mass spectra of the ULAM‐exposed interface region and of the PVdF topcoat and PU primer bulks indicates that the material composition of the polymer/polymer interface region is substantially different to that of the bulk PVdF and PU coatings. Analysis of the negative ion mass spectra obtained from the PVdF/PU interface reveals the presence of a methacrylate‐based component or additive at the interface region. Reviewing the topcoat and primer coating formulations reveals that the PVdF topcoat formulation contains methyl methacrylate (MMA)–ethyl acrylate (EA) acrylic co‐polymer components. Negative ion ToF‐SIMS analysis of an acrylic co‐polymer confirms that it is these components that are observed at the PVdF/PU interface. Post‐processing extraction of ToF‐SIMS images based on the major ions of the MMA–EA co‐polymers reveals that these components are observed in high concentration at the extremities of the PVdF coating, i.e. at the polymer/polymer interface, but are also observed to be distributed evenly throughout the bulk of the PVdF topcoat. These findings confirm that a fraction of the MMA–EA acrylic co‐polymers in the formulation segregate to the topcoat/primer interface where they enhance the adhesive properties exhibited by the PVdF topcoat towards the underlying PU primer substrate. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Read full abstract