Teacher training, professional development, and existing research on the teaching of controversial issues all largely relate to teacher preparation for lessons on topics known in advance. However, teachers often cannot anticipate spontaneous, explosive student remarks and must address them without advance preparation. This mixed-methods study performed a qualitative and quantitative examination of the most common types of student statements that teachers encounter, their methods of action, their educational goals, and their concerns and needs in facing this challenge. In an online questionnaire, 160 Israeli Jewish secondary school teachers were presented with two scenarios, one regarding a homophobic statement in the classroom and the other regarding a racist statement. The questionnaire asked whether the teachers had encountered a similar statement in their classrooms, and if so, to describe the statement and their response. In addition, it posed closed questions to the teachers regarding the appropriate course of action in each scenario and their educational goals in similar cases. Data was analyzed using the N-Vivo software, and variable-by-variable matrices were produced in order to examine the findings according to the teachers’ stated levels of religiosity. The research findings indicated that most teachers encounter homophobic and racist statements. Regardless of their degree of religiosity, they usually choose not to ignore explosive statements, instead facilitating a class discussion alongside disciplinary treatment and one-on-one conversation if necessary. The teachers’ goals were first and foremost liberal-democratic, and national-religious goals were at the bottom of the ranking. The exception was found among religiously devout teachers, who ranked religious values first, followed by tolerance, discussion culture, and critical thinking. The teachers’ primary concern was the issue of backup, followed by fear of dismissal and shaming on social media. The study demonstrates that explosive statements are not a rare phenomenon and may hurt a variety of groups in Israeli society. The findings reflect the need for a process of moral and social self-reflection in Israeli Jewish society, a reexamination of training and professional development programs for teachers, and a reevaluation of the current research focus on structured and prearranged discussions. The study points to the commonality between teachers in various streams of education, all of whom prioritized acceptance of the other and pluralism, as reflected in the prominence of tolerance and other liberaldemocratic educational goals. In an era of increased polarization and extremism in Israel and worldwide, it is important to prepare teachers to combat homophobic and racist statements and train students for a tolerant democratic discourse.