Complementary Anticodons Research Articles

A tRNA modification pattern that facilitates interpretation of the genetic code.

Interpretation of the genetic code from triplets of nucleotides to amino acids is fundamental to life. This interpretation is achieved by cellular tRNAs, each reading a triplet codon through its complementary anticodon (positions 34-36) while delivering the amino acid charged to its 3'-end. This amino acid is then incorporated into the growing polypeptide chain during protein synthesis on the ribosome. The quality and versatility of the interpretation is ensured not only by the codon-anticodon pairing, but also by the post-transcriptional modifications at positions 34 and 37 of each tRNA, corresponding to the wobble nucleotide at the first position of the anticodon and the nucleotide on the 3'-side of the anticodon, respectively. How each codon is read by the matching anticodon, and which modifications are required, cannot be readily predicted from the codon-anticodon pairing alone. Here we provide an easily accessible modification pattern that is integrated into the genetic code table. We focus on the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli as a model, which is one of the few organisms whose entire set of tRNA modifications and modification genes is identified and mapped. This work provides an important reference tool that will facilitate research in protein synthesis, which is at the core of the cellular life.

Genetic Code Engineering by Natural and Unnatural Base Pair Systems for the Site-Specific Incorporation of Non-Standard Amino Acids Into Proteins

Amino acid sequences of proteins are encoded in nucleic acids composed of four letters, A, G, C, and T(U). However, this four-letter alphabet coding system limits further functionalities of proteins by the twenty letters of amino acids. If we expand the genetic code or develop alternative codes, we could create novel biological systems and biotechnologies by the site-specific incorporation of non-standard amino acids (or unnatural amino acids, unAAs) into proteins. To this end, new codons and their complementary anticodons are required for unAAs. In this review, we introduce the current status of methods to incorporate new amino acids into proteins by in vitro and in vivo translation systems, by focusing on the creation of new codon-anticodon interactions, including unnatural base pair systems for genetic alphabet expansion.

Targeting nonsense-mediated cystic fibrosis: is it premature to stop now?

The standard model of cellular protein production involves transcription of mRNA from DNA followed by translation of the mRNA by ribosomal tRNA interactions. The ribosome induces binding of tRNAs with complementary anticodon sequences to those of the mRNA. The tRNAs carry specific amino acids that are chained together into a polypeptide. Termination of lengthening of the polypeptide chain is accomplished by the presence of specific termination codons in the mRNA. If a mutation occurs that inserts a termination codon in a premature position, the resulting mRNA might be degraded by a process known as nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, or a truncated, non-functional protein might be produced.

Transfer RNA Misidentification Scrambles Sense Codon Recoding

Sense codon recoding is the basis for genetic code expansion with more than two different noncanonical amino acids. It requires an unused (or rarely used) codon, and an orthogonal tRNA synthetase:tRNA pair with the complementary anticodon. The Mycoplasma capricolum genome contains just six CGG arginine codons, without a dedicated tRNA(Arg). We wanted to reassign this codon to pyrrolysine by providing M. capricolum with pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase, a synthetic tRNA with a CCG anticodon (tRNA(Pyl)(CCG)), and the genes for pyrrolysine biosynthesis. Here we show that tRNA(Pyl)(CCG) is efficiently recognized by the endogenous arginyl-tRNA synthetase, presumably at the anticodon. Mass spectrometry revealed that in the presence of tRNA(Pyl)(CCG), CGG codons are translated as arginine. This result is not unexpected as most tRNA synthetases use the anticodon as a recognition element. The data suggest that tRNA misidentification by endogenous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases needs to be overcome for sense codon recoding.

On primordial sense-antisense coding.

The genetic code is implemented by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS). These 20 enzymes are divided into two classes that, despite performing same functions, have nothing common in structure. The mystery of this striking partition of aaRSs might have been concealed in their sterically complementary modes of tRNA recognition that, as we have found recently, protect the tRNAs with complementary anticodons from confusion in translation. This finding implies that, in the beginning, life increased its coding repertoire by the pairs of complementary codons (rather than one-by-one) and used both complementary strands of genes as templates for translation. The class I and class II aaRSs may represent one of the most important examples of such primordial sense-antisense (SAS) coding (Rodin and Ohno, Orig Life Evol Biosph 25:565-589, 1995). In this report, we address the issue of SAS coding in a wider scope. We suggest a variety of advantages that such coding would have had in exploring a wider sequence space before translation became highly specific. In particular, we confirm that in Achlya klebsiana a single gene might have originally coded for an HSP70 chaperonin (class II aaRS homolog) and an NAD-specific GDH-like enzyme (class I aaRS homolog) via its sense and antisense strands. Thus, in contrast to the conclusions in Williams et al. (Mol Biol Evol 26:445-450, 2009), this could indeed be a "Rosetta stone" gene (Carter and Duax, Mol Cell 10:705-708, 2002) (eroded somewhat, though) for the SAS origin of the two aaRS classes.

Computer simulation of tRNA evolution

Point mutation and complementary theory are two controversial mechanisms of tRNA evolution. To identify the predominant or most suitable mechanism to explain modern tRNA evolution, this paper presents a rough evolution model for modern tRNA sequences using computer simulation. The tRNA networks of the sequences produced by the model were compared with the real tRNA network. It was found that when the ‘ancestor sequences’ have a probability greater than 50% of mutating by the point mutation mechanism and a probability less than 50% of mutating by the complementary anticodon method at the same time, the tRNAs produced by the model should have a network behavior similar to that of the real tRNAs network.

Helix 69 in 23S rRNA modulates decoding by wild type and suppressor tRNAs

Helix 69 of 23S rRNA forms one of the major inter-subunit bridges of the 70S ribosome and interacts with A- and P-site tRNAs and translation factors. Despite the proximity of h69 to the decoding center and tRNAs, the contribution of h69 to the tRNA selection process is unclear: previous genetic analyses have shown that h69 mutations increase frameshifting and readthrough of stop codons. However, a complete deletion of h69 does not affect the selection of cognate tRNAs in vitro. To address these discrepancies, the in vivo effects of a range of single- and multi-base h69 mutations in Escherichia coli 23S rRNA on various translation errors have been determined. While a majority of the h69 mutations examined here affected readthrough of stop codons and frameshifting, the DeltaA1916 single base deletion mutation uniquely influenced missense decoding. Different h69 mutants had either increased or decreased levels of stop codon readthrough. The h69 mutations that decreased UGA readthrough also decreased UGA reading by a mutant, near-cognate tRNA(Trp) carrying a G24A substitution in the D arm, but had far less effect on UGA reading by a suppressor tRNA with a complementary anticodon. These results suggest that h69 interactions with release factors contribute significantly to termination efficiency and that interaction with the D arm of A-site tRNA is important for discrimination between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs.

One ancestor for two codes viewed from the perspective of two complementary modes of tRNA aminoacylation.

BackgroundThe genetic code is brought into action by 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These enzymes are evenly divided into two classes (I and II) that recognize tRNAs from the minor and major groove sides of the acceptor stem, respectively. We have reported recently that: (1) ribozymic precursors of the synthetases seem to have used the same two sterically mirror modes of tRNA recognition, (2) having these two modes might have helped in preventing erroneous aminoacylation of ancestral tRNAs with complementary anticodons, yet (3) the risk of confusion for the presumably earliest pairs of complementarily encoded amino acids had little to do with anticodons. Accordingly, in this communication we focus on the acceptor stem.ResultsOur main result is the emergence of a palindrome structure for the acceptor stem's common ancestor, reconstructed from the phylogenetic trees of Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya. In parallel, for pairs of ancestral tRNAs with complementary anticodons, we present updated evidence of concerted complementarity of the second bases in the acceptor stems. These two results suggest that the first pairs of "complementary" amino acids that were engaged in primordial coding, such as Gly and Ala, could have avoided erroneous aminoacylation if and only if the acceptor stems of their adaptors were recognized from the same, major groove, side. The class II protein synthetases then inherited this "primary preference" from isofunctional ribozymes.ConclusionTaken together, our results support the hypothesis that the genetic code per se (the one associated with the anticodons) and the operational code of aminoacylation (associated with the acceptor) diverged from a common ancestor that probably began developing before translation. The primordial advantage of linking some amino acids (most likely glycine and alanine) to the ancestral acceptor stem may have been selective retention in a protocell surrounded by a leaky membrane for use in nucleotide and coenzyme synthesis. Such acceptor stems (as cofactors) thus transferred amino acids as groups for biosynthesis. Later, with the advent of an anticodon loop, some amino acids (such as aspartic acid, histidine, arginine) assumed a catalytic role while bound to such extended adaptors, in line with the original coding coenzyme handle (CCH) hypothesis.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Rob Knight, Juergen Brosius and Anthony Poole.

Partitioning of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in Two Classes Could Have Been Encoded in a Strand-Symmetric RNA World

The "chicken-or-egg" dilemma dictates that archaic tRNAs be aminoacylated by ribozymic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, rAARSs, with protein synthetases (pAARSs) emerging later and, strikingly in two versions. However, the distribution of these two versions among the codons also suggests their involvement in development of the genetic code. Here we propose a solution to this controversy, which relies on a primordial complementarity hypothesis that in a strand-symmetric RNA world both complementary replicas of many genes could encode the first proteins. Accordingly, if one rearranges the code table in a manner that puts complementary codons directly against each other, an almost perfect mirror symmetry in tRNA aminoacylation by the two groups of synthetases is revealed. Specifically, the pairs of complementary anticodons from the same pAARS class tend to contain RR and YY dinucleotides at first and second versus third and second positions, whereas in pairs of pAARSs from the different classes these positions are occupied by YR and RY, including CG, GC, UA, and AU palindromes. The latter are indistinguishable in complementary anticodons, thus leading to erroneous aminoacylation (note that there is no such problem for RR- and YY-containing complementary anticodons). This can be averted by "spreading out" tRNA recognition by two rAARSs away from the anticodons in the opposite directions, giving two complementary rAARSs. The principle of evolutionary continuity suggests that their protein successors also arose on complementary strands. Our analyses support this hypothesis.

Origin of the Genetic Code: First Aminoacyl–tRNA Synthetases Could Replace Isofunctional Ribozymes When Only the Second Base of Codons Was Established

Analysis of the updated compilation of more than 8,000 tRNA gene sequences confirmed our previously reported finding that in pairs of consensus tRNAs with complementary anticodons, their second bases in the acceptor stems are also complementary. This dual complementarity points to the following: (1) the operational code embodied in the acceptor stem, and the classic genetic code embodied in the anticodon could have had the same common ancestor; (2) new tRNAs most likely entered primitive translation in pairs with complementary anticodons; and (3) this process of code expansion was directed by the primordial double-strand coding. However, we did not find the dual complementarity when testing all tRNA pairs in which anticodons were complementary only at the central position, but not complementary at least at one of the flanking two positions. This observation, together with certain additional evidence, suggests that both codes were still being shaped (with only the second base established at the time) when the first protein aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases could have already started replacing their ribozymic precursors.

Expanding the genetic code: selection of efficient suppressors of four-base codons and identification of “shifty” four-base codons with a library approach in Escherichia coli

Naturally occurring tRNA mutants are known that suppress +1 frameshift mutations by means of an extended anticodon loop, and a few have been used in protein mutagenesis. In an effort to expand the number of possible ways to uniquely and efficiently encode unnatural amino acids, we have devised a general strategy to select tRNAs with the ability to suppress four-base codons from a library of tRNAs with randomized 8 or 9 nt anticodon loops. Our selectants included both known and novel suppressible four-base codons and resulted in a set of very efficient, non-cross-reactive tRNA/four-base codon pairs for AGGA, UAGA, CCCU and CUAG. The most efficient four-base codon suppressors had Watson-Crick complementary anticodons, and the sequences of the anticodon loops outside of the anticodons varied with the anticodon. Additionally, four-base codon reporter libraries were used to identify “shifty” sites at which +1 frameshifting is most favorable in the absence of suppressor tRNAs in Escherichia coli. We intend to use these tRNAs to explore the limits of unnatural polypeptide biosynthesis, both in vitro and eventually in vivo. In addition, this selection strategy is being extended to identify novel five- and six-base codon suppressors.

Discrimination by Escherichia coli initiation factor IF3 against initiation on non-canonical codons relies on complementarity rules

Translation initiation factor IF3, one of three factors specifically required for translation initiation in Escherichia coli, inhibits initiation on any codon other than the three canonical initiation codons, AUG, GUG, or UUG. This discrimination against initiation on non-canonical codons could be due to either direct recognition of the two last bases of the codon and their cognate bases on the anticodon or to some ability to “feel” codon-anticodon complementarity. To investigate the importance of codon-anticodon complementarity in the discriminatory role of IF3, we constructed a derivative of tRNA Leu that has all the known characteristics of an initiator tRNA except the CAU anticodon. This tRNA is efficiently formylated by methionyl-tRNA fMet transformylase and charged by leucyl-tRNA synthetase irrespective of the sequence of its anticodon. These initiator tRNA Leu derivatives (called tRNA LI) allow initiation at all the non-canonical codons tested, provided that the complementarity between the codon and the anticodon of the initiator tRNA Leu is respected. More remarkably, the discrimination by IF3, normally observed with non-canonical codons, is neutralised if a tRNA LI carrying a complementary anticodon is used for initiation. This suggests that IF3 somehow recognises codon-anticodon complementarity, at least at the second and third position of the codon, rather than some specific bases in either the codon or the anticodon.

Structural Studies of 2-Thiouridine in RNA

A pentamer RNA sequence, Gs2UUUC, and a s2U containing 14-mer RNA tetraloop hairpin were synthesized and characterized by NMR and by UV melting studies. These oligonucleotides were used as models to understand the effect of 2-thiouridine substitution on RNA structure and the potential for stabilization of tRNA codon-anticodon interactions through sU-34 modification. The magnitude of the effect of sU in our model system is comparable to the 20° C stabilization reported for 2-thiolation in a codonanticodon model system composed of two tRNAs with complementary anticodon sequences.

Synthesis and studies on the effect of 2-thiouridine and 4-thiouridine on sugar conformation and RNA duplex stability.

In order to understand the effect of 2-thiouridine (s2U) substitution on RNA structure and the potential for stabilization of tRNA codon-anticodon interactions through s2U-34 modification, a pentamer RNA sequence, Gs2UUUC, was synthesized and characterized by NMR spectroscopy. The single strand contains the UUU anticodon sequence of tRNALys with flanking GCs to increase duplex stability. Regiochemical effects of uridine thiolation were determined by comparing the structure and stability of the 2-thiouridine containing oligonucleotide with an identical sequence containing 4-thiouridine (s4U) and also the normal uridine nucleoside. Circular dichroism spectrum indicated an A-form helical conformation for Gs2UUUC which was further confirmed by 2D ROESY NMR experiments. The duplex stability of the three pentamers complexed with a 2'-O-methyl-ribonucleotide complementary strand, GmAmAmAmCm, was determined by UV thermal melting studies and by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The duplex containing s2U has a T m of 30.7 degrees C compared to 19. 0 degrees C for the unmodified control and 14.5 degrees C for the s4U containing duplex. The results from UV experiments were corroborated by imino proton NMR studies that show proton exchange rates, chemical shift differences, and NH proton linewidths indicative of the stability order s2U >U >s4U. The magnitude of the effect of s2U in our model system is comparable to the 20 degrees C stabilization observed by Grosjean and co-workers for 2-thiolation in a codon-anticodon model system composed of two tRNAs with complementary anticodon sequences [Houssier, C., Degee, P., Nicoghosian, K. and Grosjean, H. (1988) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 5, 1259-1266].

The presence of codon-anticodon pairs in the acceptor stem of tRNAs.

A total of 1268 available (excluding mitochondrial) tRNA sequences was used to reconstruct the common consensus image of their acceptor domains. Its structure appeared as a 11-bp-long double-stranded palindrome with complementary triplets in the center, each flanked by the 3'-ACCD and NGGU-5' motifs on each strand (D, base determinator). The palindrome readily extends up to the modern tRNA-like cloverleaf passing through an intermediate hairpin having in the center the single-stranded triplet, in supplement to its double-stranded precursor. The latter might represent an original anticodon-codon pair mapped at 1-2-3 positions of the present-day tRNA acceptors. This conclusion is supported by the striking correlation: in pairs of consensus tRNAs with complementary anticodons, their bases at the 2nd position of the acceptor stem were also complementary. Accordingly, inverse complementarity was also evident at the 71st position of the acceptor stem. With a single exception (tRNA(Phe)-tRNA(Glu) pair), the parallelism is especially impressive for the pairs of tRNAs recognized by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) from the opposite classes. The above complementarity still doubly presented at the key central position of real single-stranded anticodons and their hypothetical double-stranded precursors is consistent with our previous data pointing to the double-strand use of ancient RNAs in the origin of the main actors in translation- tRNAs with complementary anticodons and the two classes of aaRS.

On concerted origin of transfer RNAs with complementary anticodons.

Pairs of antiparallely oriented consensus tRNAs with complementary anticodons show surprisingly small numbers of mispairings within the 17-bp- long anticodon stem and loop region. Even smaller such complementary distances are shown by illegitimately complementary anticodons, i.e. those with allowed pairing between G and U bases. Accordingly, we suppose that transfer RNAs have emerged concertedly as complementary strands of primordial double helix-like RNA molecules. Replication of such molecules with illegitimately complementary anticodons might generate new synonymous codons for the same pair of amino acids. Logically, the idea of tRNA concerted origin dictates very ancient establishment of direct links between anticodons and the type of amino acids with which pre-tRNAs were to be charged. More specifically, anticodons (first of all, the 2nd base) could selectively target 'their' amino acids, reaction of acylating itself being performed by another non-specific site of pre-tRNA or even by another ribozyme. In all, the above findings and speculations are consistent to the hypercyclic concept (Eigen and Schuster, 1979), and throw new light on the genetic code origin and associated problems. Also favoring this idea are data on complementary codon usage patterns in different genomes.

Destabilization of codon-anticodon interaction in the ribosomal exit site

The affinities of the exit (E) site of poly(U) or poly(A)-programmed Escherichia coli ribosomes for the respective cognate tRNA and a number of non-cognate tRNAs were determined by equilibrium titrations. Among the non-cognate tRNAs, the binding constants vary up to about tenfold (10 6 to 10 7 m −1 at 20 m m-Mg 2+) or 50-fold (10 m m-Mg 2+), indicating that codon-independent binding is modulated to a considerable extent by structural elements of the tRNA molecules other than the anticodon. Codon-anticodon interaction stabilizes tRNA binding in the E site approximately fourfold (20 m m-Mg 2+) or 20-fold (10 m m-Mg 2+), corresponding to ΔG ° values of −3 and −7 kJ/mol (0.7 and 1.7 kcal/mol), respectively. Thus, the energetic contribution of codon-anticodon interaction to tRNA binding in the E site appears rather small, particularly in comparison to the large effects on the binding in A and P sites and to the binding of complementary oligonucleotides or of tRNAs with complementary anticodons. This result argues against a role of the E site-bound tRNA in the fixation of the mRNA on the ribosome. In contrast, we propose that the role of the E site is to facilitate the release of the discharged tRNA during translocation by providing an intermediate, labile binding site for the tRNA leaving the P site. The lowering of both affinity and stability of tRNA binding accompanying the transfer of the tRNA from the P site to the E site is predominantly due to the labilization of the codon-anticodon interaction.

Evolution of anticodons: variations in the genetic code.

Clues to evolution of the genetic code can be found by comparing usage of anticodons in various organisms and organelles. GC content of DNA varies, as a result of directional mutation pressure (AT/GC pressure), especially in bacteria. Low GC in Mycoplasma is accompanied by use of UGA for tryptophan and, in ciliated protozoa, by use of UAA and UAG for glutamine. These are examples of "stop codon capture," which has been preceded by duplication of tRNA genes followed by nucleotide substitutions in their sequences, including mutational changes in their anticodons. Evolutionary changes in the code may have resulted from disappearance of codons and anticodons resulting from GC pressure and from their reappearance when the direction of the pressure was reversed. In this manner, codon UGA and anticodon UCA for tryptophan could have disappeared under GC pressure and reappeared in Mycoplasma under AT pressure. Stop codon UGA may have been the third of the three stop codons to appear, originating from mutations in UAA. Changes in the code are adaptive and nondeleterious. We propose that the number of anticodons has increased and that evolution continued until three existing forms of the universal code were produced: eukaryotic, eubacterial, and the code for halobacteria and methanococci. These three codes are distinguished from each other by their anticodon pattern. The eukaryotic code contains eight INN (ANN) anticodons that have replaced GNN anticodons as a result of AT pressure. Mitochondrial and chloroplast codes have evolved from the eubacterial code through genomic economization and AT pressure, leading to losses of GNN and CNN anticodons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Conformational dynamics of the anticodon loop in yeast tRNAPhe as sensed by the fluorescence of wybutine

Conformational and dynamic properties of the anticodon loop of yeast tRNAPhe were investigated by analyzing the time resolved fluorescence of wybutine serving as a local structural probe adjacent to the anticodon GmAA on its 3' side. The influence of Mg2+, important for stabilizing the tertiary structure of tRNA, and of the complementary anticodon s2UUC of E. coli tRNA2Glu were investigated. Fluorescence lifetimes and anisotropies were measured with ps time resolution using time correlated single photon counting and a mode locked synchronously pumped and frequency doubled dye laser as excitation source. From the analysis of lifetimes (tau) and rotational relaxation times (tau R) we conclude that wybutine occurs in various structural states: one stacked conformation where the base has no free mobility and the only rotational motion reflects the mobility of the whole tRNA molecule (tau = 6 ns, tau R = 19 ns), an unstacked conformation where the base can freely rotate (tau = 100 ps, tau R = 370 ps) and an intermediary state (tau = 2 ns, tau R = 1.6 ns). Under biological conditions, i.e. in the presence of Mg2+ and neutral salts, wybutine is found in a stacked and immobile state which is consistent with the crystallographic picture. In the presence of the complementary codon however, as exemplified by the E. coli-tRNA2Glu anticodon, our analysis indicates that the codon-anticodon complex exists in an equilibrium of structural states with different rotational mobility of wybutine. The conformation with wybutine freely mobile is the predominant one and suggests that this conformation of the codon-anticodon structure differs from the canonical 3'-5' stack.

Temperature jump relaxation studies on the interactions between transfer RNAs with complementary anticodons. The effect of modified bases adjacent to the anticodon triplet.

We have used the temperature-jump relaxation technique to determine the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the association between the following tRNAs pairs having complementary anticodons: tRNA(Ser) with tRNA(Gly), tRNA(Cys) with tRNA(Ala) and tRNA(Trp) with tRNA(Pro). The anticodon sequence of E. coli tRNA(Ser), GGA, is complementary to the U*CC anticodon of E. coli tRNA(Gly(2] (where U* is a still unknown modified uridine base) and A37 is not modified in none of these two tRNAs. E. coli tRNA(Ala) has a VGC anticodon (V is 5-oxyacetic acid uridine) while tRNA(Cys) has the complementary GCA anticodon with a modified adenine on the 3' side, namely 2-methylthio N6-isopentenyl adenine (mS2i6A37) in E. Coli tRNA(Cys) and N6-isopentenyl adenine (i6A37) in yeast tRNA(Cys). The brewer yeast tRNA(Trp) (anticodon CmCA) differs from the wild type E. coli tRNA(Trp) (anticodon CCA) in several positions of the nucleotide sequence. Nevertheless, in the anticodon loop, only two interesting differences are present: A37 is not modified while C34 at the first anticodon position is modified into a ribose 2'-O methyl derivative (Cm). The corresponding complementary tRNA is E.coli tRNA(Pro) with the VGG anticodon. Our results indicate a dominant effect of the nature and sequence of the anticodon bases and their nearest neighbor in the anticodon loop (particularly at position 37 on the 3' side); no detectable influence of modifications in the other tRNA stems has been detected. We found a strong stabilizing effect of the methylthio group on i6A37 as compared to isopentenyl modification of the same residue. We have not been able so far to assess the effect of isopentenyl modification alone in comparison to unmodified A37. The results obtained with the complex yeast tRNA(Trp)-E.coli tRNA(Pro) also suggest that a modification of C34 to Cm34 does not significantly increase the stability of tRNA(Trp) association with its complementary anticodon in tRNA(Pro). The observations are discussed in the light of inter- and intra-strand stacking interactions among the anticodon triplets and with the purine base adjacent to them, and of possible biological implications.