The article defines Ukraine as an independent European country with the status of a maritime state, access to the Seas of Azov and the Black Sea, a long coastline, and a significant area of water space. Economic security in maritime transport is interpreted as a subsystem of economic security of the state, and its objects are defined as: security of port infrastructure, security of navigation, anti-terrorist security of transportation, man-made and ecological security of functioning of sea ports. The advantages, opportunities, weaknesses and threats of the port infrastructure of Ukraine are summarized. A conclusion was made about the low ratings of Ukraine in the Global Index of Competitiveness of Countries according to the indicator «Efficiency of Sea Ports» of the quality of transport infrastructure. It is shown that the criteria for the efficiency of the functioning of seaports are: the state of their material and technical base (quality), as well as quantitative indicators of the volume of export, import, transit, cargo turnover, the number of processed vessels, etc. An assessment of informational changes in the Register of Seaports of Ukraine has been provided. It is shown that at the moment only half of them are working due to the military aggression of Russia and the temporary loss of control over the seaports of the AR «Crimea» and the Sea of Azov, as well as the blocking of the Black Sea ports. The shift of business activity to the ports of the Danube region is shown. The measures of the state to reduce the danger of sea transportation in the conditions of martial law in terms of loss compensation, risk insurance, implementation of the multilateral agreement on the export of grain and food products from Ukrainian ports have been systematized. Organizational models of regulation of seaport activity are characterized. It is proved that their domestic form of state unitary enterprise of commercial type, managed by the Administration of Sea Ports of Ukraine, gravitates towards the «port-instrument» model. Reasonable expediency of transition to the «port-owner» model, which provides for the concession of port assets and infrastructure owned by the state, development of competition between sea ports, simplification of customs procedures when crossing borders, reduction of port dues rates, etc.