AbstractBackgroundTo compare the performance of plasma p‐tau181, plasma‐NfL and FDG‐PET in the diagnosis of biological AD.MethodWe included 787 participants (cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 251), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 412), and Alzheimer’s dementia (AD, n = 124) from the ADNI database. Participants underwent measures of plasma p‐tau181, plasma‐NfL, CSF P‐tau181, [18F]FDG‐PET, amyloid‐PET and cognitive screening tests. ROC analyses were used to determine diagnostic accuracy of plasma P‐tau181, NfL and [18F]FDG‐PET using clinical diagnosis and core AD biomarkers (amyloid‐PET and CSF P‐tau181) as reference standards. We assessed whether plasma P‐tau181 and [18F]FDG‐PET diagnostic accuracies were significantly different with a bootstrap‐based test (pROC package in R). Second, correlations of [18F]FDG‐PET, plasma‐NfL, plasma P‐tau181 with P‐tau181 CSF, Aβ‐PET, and cognitive performance were evaluated. Correlation coefficients were compared via Cocor package, a statistical framework for comparing associations between intercorrelated measurements.ResultAcross the total sample we observed that plasma P‐tau181, plasma‐NfL, and [18F]FDG‐PET were able to identify individuals with CSF evidence of AD as well as participants who are amyloid‐PET+. In the MCI group, plasma P‐tau181 outperformed [18F]FDG‐PET and plasma‐NfL in identifying AD pathophysiology measured via CSF P‐tau181 (p = 0.0007), and amyloid‐PET (p = 0.001). We also observed that both plasma P‐tau181, plasma‐NfL and [18F]FDG‐PET were associated with AD pathophysiology measured by core AD biomarkers (CSF and amyloid‐PET). However, [18F]FDG‐PET was more closely associated with cognitive outcomes than plasma P‐tau181 and plasma NfL (MoCA: p < 0.0001; MMSE: p< 0.0001; CDR‐SB: p < 0.0001)ConclusionThis study investigated the diagnostic properties of plasma P‐tau181 and two neurodegenerative biomarkers (plasma‐NfL and [18F]FDG‐PET) as well as their to identify biological AD. While plasma P‐tau181, plasma‐NfL concentrations and [18F]FDG‐PET were associated with AD pathophysiology measured by core AD biomarkers (CSF and amyloid‐PET), plasma P‐tau181 outperformed [18F]FDG‐PET and plasma‐NfL in identifying individuals with AD pathophysiology. However, we also observed that [18F]FDG‐PET was more strongly associated with neuropsychological assessments than plasma P‐tau181 and plasma‐NfL. Taken together, our study suggests that plasma P‐tau181 may aid in the evaluation of individuals by identifying those with underlying AD pathophysiology.