This research aims to evaluate and improve the applicability of three commonly utilized thermal comfort indices—standard effective temperature (SET), physiological equivalent temperature (PET), and universal thermal climate index (UTCI)—in outdoor environments. The study was conducted in four typical spaces of a university in Xi’an, China, covering different environmental settings: East Lake (Place 1), tree-lined path (Place 2), campus playground (Place 3), and campus square (Place 4). A total of 322 volunteers participated by completing a subjective sensory questionnaire in randomized environments, and on-place meteorological data were collected. The study yielded three primary findings. First, the tree-lined path (Place 2) was identified as the most comfortable outdoor space on the university campus during summer, whereas East Lake (Place 1) was the least comfortable. Second, substantial residuals were observed for SET, PET, and UTCI across different places when assessing the thermal comfort variations experienced by the subjects. Third, Bayesian regression and random forest regression were employed to analyze and adjust the thermal comfort indices. The comparative study found that after correction, the model explanatory power of PET increased by up to 20%, with the standard deviation of residuals decreasing by up to 0.314 and MSE decreasing by up to 0.1912. The model explanatory power of SET increased by up to 31.2%, with the standard deviation of residuals decreasing by up to 0.3867 and MSE decreasing by up to 0.3012. For UTCI, the model explanatory power increased by up to 10.5%, the standard deviation of residuals decreased by up to 0.2215, and the MSE decreased by up to 0.1002.
Read full abstract