Candidate Of Sciences In Economics Research Articles

ПРОБЛЕМИ РОЗВИТКУ КРОСКУЛЬТУРНОГО МЕНЕДЖМЕНТУ В УКРАЇНІ

JEL Classification: J53,J8, M14,M59 DOI: http://doi.org/10.34025/2310-8185-2022-3.87.07 Andriy Kruhlyanko, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-2901 Oksana Verstiak, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-4964 Inna Kormakova, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Senior Lecturer, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3237-9396 Chernivtsi Institute of Trade and Economics of SUTE, Chernivtsi THE MAIN PROBLEMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CROSS- CULTURAL MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE Summary Cross-cultural interaction is becoming an increasingly important problem in the modern world: business relations are expanding, multinational teams of managers are being formed, transnational companies are developing, international public associations are being organized, and intercultural relations are growing. The emergence of international management in the nineties is determined by the emergence of new management problems in large international companies with multinational staff. Organization of the corporate work of the personnel with different cultural attitudes requires studying the patterns of interaction in a multinational environment. Cross-cultural interactions began to concern the problems of group dynamics, taking into account national traditions and cultural differences. The integration of Ukraine into the European community requires knowledge and skills of cross-cultural communication, adaptation of own management model to modern European requirements, which determined the choice of this research topic.The theoretical and methodological basis of the research are the fundamental provisions of management and international economics; formal logics; general scientific theoretical methods of generalization, comparison, which involves a consistent and structural analysis of basic terms and concepts (when researching the essence and content, forming the concept of "cross-cultural management"); combination of systematic and logical-sequential analysis methods, synthesis for the study of cross-cultural management problems. The purpose of the article is to determine the problems of the development of cross- cultural management in Ukraine. The essence and nature of cross-cultural management is studied; the main problems of the development of cross-cultural management in Ukraine are highlighted and considered; the necessity of adapting the Ukrainian management model to modern European realities is substantiated; ways to improve cross-cultural communication during war are suggested. The proposed problems of the development of cross-cultural management in Ukraine can be used for the practical solution of tasks related to the processes of adapting the Ukrainian model of management to modern European realities.

Perm (fainburg) scientific school of sociology: history and development process

The Perm School of Sociology appeared in the mid-60s of the twentieth century to a large extent thanks to the famous philosopher, sociologist, culturologist, political economist, doctor of philosophy and candidate of economic sciences, professor Zakhar Ilyich Fainburg (24.01.1922 10.09.1990). The distinctive feature of this scholar school has been the working combination of profound theoretical analysis of the modern social phenomena, fundamental reasons revealing of their occurrence and specific applied empirical researches, ending with specific recommendations that take into account the analyzed organizations and regions specific features. The present school to exists, functions and actively works for the benefit of the sociology of Russia.

Theory of collectivist society formation (on the 100th anniversary of the birth of Zakhar Ilyich Fainburg)

The 24th of January 2022 marked the 100th anniversary of the birth of the famous philosopher, sociologist, culturologist, political economist, Doctor of Philosophy and Candidate of Economic Sciences, Professor Zakhar Ilyich Fainburg (24.01.1922 10.09.1990). The years of his life chronologically almost coincided with the time of Soviet socialism. His scientific work from the student times until his death was devoted to one topic the socio-economic mechanisms of social development during the transition or shift from individualistic societies to a collectivist-type society. These mechanisms covered the entirety of society development processes from changing the nature of labor at work to overcoming religious-like social consciousness. The results of the scientific search of Z.I. Fainburg are system-based, because they contain various aspects of the structure and functioning of modern society in their unity / solidarity, and, moreover, they are characterized as essential, because they provide the modern researcher with heuristically valuable methodology and social knowledge instrumentarium. There has been analyzed the characteristic features of Z.I. Fainburgs systemic approach concerning the scientists examination of the nature of labor and the formation of its new historical type; the culture and core values of the individual, as well as the personality development concept in a post-economic society and the prospects for the collectivist society formation as a new social reality. Serious attention is paid to semiotic problems related to the use of thought experiment methods in socio-philosophical science fiction and the construction of concepts of new social knowledge.

Ensuring environmental safety of the food industry: Influence on leadership positions in the economy

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the peculiarities of ensuring environmental safety of products of the food industry. The problems of ensuring environmental safety of the food industry have been identified and the current state and the trends of food industry development in Ukraine have been analyzed. For increasing the leadership positions of the food industry of Ukraine in order to ensure its environmental safety, it has been proposed to strengthen the effective interaction of all interested parties - the state, food industry enterprises, agricultural producers and research institutions. Keywords: Economy; Ecological safety; Food industry; Competitiveness References The Law of Ukraine On Quality and Safety of Food Products and Food Raw Materials As amended by the Laws of Ukraine // The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine). 2005. No. 50. Art. 533. Shevchenko R.I. (2015) Environmental safety of food products: definition of the concept. Food Science and Technology. 1: 65-70. Romanko S.M. (2008) Economic and legal mechanism for providing environmental safety of agricultural products: Author’s Abstract…Candidate of Juridical Sciences: 12.00.06 / S.M. Romanco; National Agrarian University, K., 19 p. The Official Website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstаt.gоv.uа Velychko O.V. (2011) Mechanism for formation of the national investment and innovation system of Ukraine: monograph / O. V. Velychko, M. M. Dubovykov, O. V. Liashchenko. Luhansk: Elton-2, 186 p. Nyzhnyk V. M. (2013) Mechanisms for increasing the competitive potential of industrial enterprises: monograph / edited by the Doctor of Economic Sciences, Prof. V. M. Nyzhnyk, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor M. V. Nikolaichuk. Khmelnytsky: KhNU. 347 p. Novoitenko I.V., Slobodian N.Ya., Malynovskyi V.V. (2016) Prospects for the development of the food industry in Ukraine. Global and National Problems of Economy: collections of scientific works. V.O. Sukhomlynskyi National University of Mykolaiv. 11: 454-460. Semenenko O.H. (2017) Analysis of food industry development in Ukraine. Economic Herald of the University. 33 (1): 168-182.

Управление персоналом в условиях кризиса: принципы и технологии

Управление персоналом в условиях кризиса: принципы и технологии

Мадам «парадигма»

The article analyzes the role of the doctor of economic sciences, Professor of Department of theory of
 management, honored worker of science of the Russian Federation Z.P. Rumyantsev in the development
 of the theory and practice of the Russian school of management; contribution to the training of the teaching
 staff. The article provides a wide range of real-world examples, professional characteristics, individual
 assessment of his joint work with the aspirate and students in the framework of formation and development
 of the scientific school of management theory. The authors share personal observations and impressions
 formed in the course of preparation and protection of dissertations on competition of a scientific degree of
 candidate of economic Sciences under the direct scientific leadership of Zinaida Petrovna Rumyantseva.

The Determinants of Mutual Funds Performance in Russia

Ksenia Akshentseva is a junior researcher at the Institute of Applied Economic Research of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation. Email ksakshentceva@gmail.com
 Alexander Abramov is a candidate of economic sciences, a leading researcher at the Institute of Applied Economic Research of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service under the President of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of the Stock Market and the Investment Market, National Research University "Higher School of Economics". Email: ae_abramov@mail.ru
 Despite 19 years of the existence of mutual funds in Russia, their performance and effectiveness remain not deeply investigated subjects. The deficit of academic research has a negative influence on the investors’ and regulator’s attitude towards the collective investment market in Russia. In contrast to many other countries oriented on the development of internal stock market, collective investment in Russia does not yet play an active role in the mobilization of internal private savings.This article intends to partially make up for the lack of knowledge about the economy of mutual funds in Russia. It presents the analysis of three measures of mutual fund performance in Russia: the share return, net flow and management company fee. The analysis is based on a unique dataset which contains information about characteristics of 755 mutual funds and covers a 13 year period of the existence of the collective investment sector in Russia. The mutual fund return is able to outperform inflation, return on government bonds and return on the 50/50 strategy. During the periods 2000-2013 and 2008-2013 the abnormal return, net flow and management company fee have followed the same regularity as their foreign counterparts. Thus, mutual funds are one of the most important players in the Russian financial market. We also showed that for the successful development of collective investment in Russia it is necessary to increase the scale of operations, cost management effectiveness and transparency

Separation of Management and Control in SMEs from Emerging Markets: The Role of Institutions

Demand by growing owner-run SMEs for specialized management knowledge is resolved primarily through the separation of ownership and control, using top management labor market and agency contracts. Under certain environmental institutional conditions, owners of Russian SMEs face difficulties separating ownership and control. Using a dataset of 500 companies from fast growing industries in St. Petersburg and Moscow, this study analyzes how various perceived characteristics of the institutional environment influence the probability of separation of ownership and control. Executive summary is available at pp. 27. The work on this paper was supported by an individual grant No R10-0702 from the Economics Education and Research Consortium, Inc. (EERC), with funds provided by the Global Development Network and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). Galina V. Shirokova — Doctorate of economic sciences, Professor, Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University e-mail : shirokova@gsom.pu.ru Dmitry M. Knatko — Candidate of economic sciences, Research assistant, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University e-mail : knatko@gsom.pu.ru Gina Vega — Professor of Management, Director of the Center for Entrepreneurial Activity, Bertolon School of Business, Salem State University e-mail : gvega@salemstate.edu

Reform in Russia: Reality or Imitation?

A discussion devoted to the analysis of the conception, course, and results of economic reforms in Russia was held in the Market Economy Theory Laboratory at the Institute of Market Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences. The participants were V.L. Per-lamutrov, doctor of economic sciences (head of laboratory); L.P. Evstigneeva, doctor of economic sciences; L.E. Sokolovskii, candidate of economic sciences; L.E. Troparevskaia, candidate of economic sciences; S.V. Solov'eva, candidate of economic sciences; and research associates: A.P. Berezovskii, L.I. Volgina, and T.I. Volodina. The materials of the discussion, which are of unquestionable interest to the scientific community, are published below.

The Three Pillars of Russian Reform: An Interview with N.G. Obushenkov

Privatization, demonopolization, and agrarian reform-these three sore points in the current stage of Russia's economic reform were the subject of a discussion at the editorial offices of MEMO in June 1992. Professor G.G. Diligenskii, the journal's editor-in-chief, talks with N.G. Obushenkov, Candidate of Economic Sciences, head research associate, MEMO RAN, a famous economist and agricultural specialist who is directly involved in drafting official programs, projects, and other reform documents.

Prospects for Democratization A Roundtable Discussion on the Problems of Political Reform in the USSR

Abstract The editorial board of the journal Rabochii klass i sovremennyi mir, together with the editorial board of the newspaper Moskovskie novosti [Moscow News], conducted a roundtable discussion on the theoretical and practical problems of political reform, and the evolution of a new political system in the Soviet Union. The following participated in the meeting: Iu. S. Markhashev, candidate of economic sciences (Rabochii klass i sovremennyi mir), V. G. Gel'bras, doctor of economic sciences (Institute of the International Workers' Movement, USSR Academy of Sciences [hereafter, IIWM]), I. M. Bunin, candidate of historical sciences (IIWM), M. Iu. Urnov, candidate of economic sciences (IIWM), K. G. Kholodkovskii, doctor of historical sciences (Institute of World Economy and International Relations, USSR Academy of Sciences), G. G. Diligenskii, doctor of historical sciences (the journal Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia), V. N. Shubkin, doctor of philosophical sciences (IIWM), L. I. Piiasheva, candidate of economic sciences (IIWM), I. M. Kliamkin, candidate ofphilosophical sciences (Institute of Economics of the World Socialist System [now called the Institute of Eastern Europe and International Research], USSR Academy of Sciences), Iu. S. Pivovarov, candidate of historical sciences (Institute of Scientific Information in the Social Sciences, USSR Academy of Sciences), L. L. Taivan, candidate of historical sciences (Institute of Oriental Studies, USSR Academy of Sciences), A. B. Zubov, candidate of historical sciences (Institute of Oriental Studies), and A. M. Salmin, doctor of historical sciences (IIWM).

Social Choice

The election campaign and the work of the Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR provided a vast amount of information on many aspects of our life, the state of public consciousness, and its attitude to general developments. The interaction of political structures, and above all the party and the party apparatus, with the population, and with Soviet power, has assumed new features. The widespread appearance of populist moods and slogans, and contradictory manifestations of ethnic self-awareness, call for interpretation. A lively discussion took place on these questions at a session of a working group of Moscow and Leningrad sociologists held at the editorial offices of the periodical Kommunist in June. The participants in the discussion were: S. Vasil'ev, candidate of economic sciences (Leningrad Institute of Finance and Economics); A. Gozman, candidate of psychological sciences (faculty of psychology at Moscow State University); Iu. Zamoshkin, doctor of philosophical sciences (Institute of the United States and Canada of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR); A. Kessel'man (Center for the Study and Forecasting of Social Processes, Leningrad); Iu. Levada, doctor of philosophical sciences (All-Union Center for the Study of Public Opinion [VTsIOM]); A. Levinson, candidate of art history (VTsIOM); A. Migranian, candidate of historical sciences (IMEMO, Academy of Sciences of the USSR); L. Sedov, candidate of historical sciences (VTsIOM); B. Filippov, candidate of historical sciences (INION of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR); A. Chubais, candidate of economic sciences (Leningrad Engineering and Economics Institute); V. Iadov, doctor of philosophical sciences (Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR).

The Journal and Restructuring

The Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences has confirmed the new editor of Voprosy ekonomiki [Problems of Economics]. The journal's new editorial board includes P. G. Bunich, correspondent member of the USSR Academy of Sciences; doctors of economic sciences I. E. Gur'ev, N. A. Klimov, B. V. Rakitskii, and L. D. Shirokorad; and candidate of economic sciences L. V. Nikiforov.