Abstract The use of time domain reflectometry (TDR) to monitor soil water content at either field or laboratory scales is highly common. Regarding the soil dry density, ρd, effect on the TDR application, three main approaches are found in the literature: (1) Ignore the density issue and use calibration to evaluate the water content regardless of the density. This approach is basic, yet common. (2) Include soil density in the calibration equation and use calibration for the water content as a function of both the TDR output and soil density. In this approach, the soil density should be provided from an independent source. (3) Determined ρd from the TDR waveform. In this case both water content and ρd are set from the TDR analysis. In cases where the ρd is not available, in order to use TDR for water content measurement, a decision has to be made whether to address the density issue although it requires resources, or to neglect it. This article reviews this issue and validates the density effect using an efficient TDR calibration methodology. A calibration scheme that controls ρd of the specimen has been developed and applied. The methodology creates continuous calibration curves over a range of volumetric water content from a single test specimen. Based on the results, it has been demonstrated that the soil density has a major effect on the TDR output and it cannot be ignored. In addition, this article presents a unique examination of ASTM D6780, Standard Test Methods for Water Content and Density of Soil In Situ by Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR). The ASTM dry density estimation was found to provide reliable results; however, the gravimetric water contents estimation gives unsatisfactory results, especially for low densities.