Biomechanical Corrected Intraocular Pressure Research Articles

Intraocular Pressure Before and After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Comparison of Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer.

The study showed that Corvis ST's biomechanical intraocular pressure (bIOP) and ocular response analyzer's (ORA) cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) do not agree well, before or after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and may not be used interchangeably. bIOP remained unchanged after PRK. To evaluate the agreement between the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST and the IOPcc measured by the ORA before and after PRK. In this prospective interventional study, a total of 53 patients (53 eyes) were included. Measurements were acquired using both the Corvis ST and ORA devices before and 3 months post-PRK. The agreement between the 2 devices was evaluated using limits of agreement (LoA) and Bland-Altman plots. The participants had a mean age of 29.6 ± 5.21 years (range: 21 to 40), with 41 (77.4%) of them being females. After the surgery, the average change in intraocular pressure (IOP) was 0.3 ± 1.7mm Hg for bIOP and -1.6 ± 4.0mm Hg for IOPcc. The corresponding 95% LoA were -3.5 to 4.2mm Hg and -9.5 to 6.3mm Hg, respectively. The 95% LoA between bIOP and IOPcc after PRK was -2.3 to 8.5mm Hg. Notably, the bIOP values were higher for IOPs <20mm Hg and lower for IOPs >20mm Hg compared with IOPcc. The findings indicate a weak agreement between the Corvis ST-bIOP and the ORA-IOPcc both before and after PRK. These devices may not be used interchangeably for IOP measurement. bIOP exhibited less variation compared with the IOPcc, suggesting that the bIOP may be a better option for IOP reading after PRK.

Corneal stress‒strain index in relation to retinal nerve fibre layer thickness among healthy young adults.

To determine the relationship between corneal stress-strain index (SSI) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness. 1645 healthy university students from a university-based study contributed to the analysis. The RNFL thickness was measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT), axial length (AL) was measured by IOL Master, and corneal biomechanics including SSI, biomechanical corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured by Corvis ST. Multivariate linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between the SSI and RNFL thickness after adjusting for potential covariates. The mean age of the participants was 19.0 0.9 years, and 1132 (68.8%) were women. Lower SSI was significantly associated with thinner RNFL thickness ( =8.601, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.999-14.203, = 0.003) after adjusting for age, CCT, bIOP, and AL. No significant association between SSI and RNFL was found in men, while the association was significant in women in the fully adjusted model. The association was significant in the nonhigh myopic group ( for trend = 0.021) but not in the highly myopic group. Eyes with greater bIOP and lower SSI had significantly thinner RNFL thickness. Eyes with lower SSI had thinner RNFL thickness after adjusting for potential covariates, especially those with higher bIOP. Our findings add novel evidence of the relationship between corneal biomechanics and retinal ganglion cell damage.

Intraocular pressure measurement and association with corneal biomechanics in patients underwent Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: a comparative study.

To compare corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with those of the follow healthy eyes. In this retrospective comparative study, a total of 35 eyes of 35 patients who underwent DSEK by a single surgeon from 2015.02 to 2019.12 were enrolled along with their fellow healthy eyes. Corneal biomechanical parameters were assessed at least 3 months post-DSEK using Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (CST). IOP was measured by CST, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and MacKay-Marg tonometer. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1) were significantly increased after DSEK when compared to the fellow eyes. In DSEK eyes, biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) and MacKay-Marg IOP correlated significantly with GAT IOP measurements, with bIOP showed the lowest IOP values. All the IOP values did not correlate with CCT. However, GAT-IOP and MacKay-Marg IOP showed a positive correlation with SP-A1. The corneal stiffness increased after DSEK. Central corneal thickness may have less influence than corneal biomechanics on IOP measurements in eyes after DSEK. Biomechanically-corrected IOP obtained by CST seemed to be lower than other tonometry techniques in DSEK eyes, perhaps because of correction for corneal stiffness, CCT and age.

Refractive associations with corneal biomechanical properties among young adults: a population-based Corvis ST study.

To assess the associations of corneal biomechanical properties as measured by the Corvis ST with refractive errors and ocular biometry in an unselected sample of young adults. A total of 1645 healthy university students underwent corneal biomechanical parameters measurement by the Corvis ST. The refractive status of the participants was measured using an autorefractor without cycloplegia. Ocular biometric parameters were measured using the IOL Master. After adjusting for the effect of age, sex, biomechanical-corrected intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness, axial length was significantly associated with A1 velocity (A1v, β = -10.47), A2 velocity (A2v, β = 4.66), A2 deflection amplitude (A2DeflA, β = -6.02), HC deflection amplitude (HC-DeflA, β = 5.95), HC peak distance (HC-PD, β = 2.57), deformation amplitude ratio max (DA Rmax, β = -0.36), Ambrósio's relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh, β = 0.002). For axial length / corneal radius ratio, only A1v (β = -2.01), A1 deflection amplitude (A1DeflA, β = 2.30), HC-DeflA (β = 1.49), HC-PD (β = -0.21), DA Rmax (β = 0.07), stress-strain index (SSI, β = -0.29), ARTh (β < 0.001) were significant associates. A1v (β = 23.18), HC-DeflA (β = -15.36), HC-PD (β = 1.27), DA Rmax (β = -0.66), SSI (β = 3.53), ARTh (β = -0.02) were significantly associated with spherical equivalent. Myopic eyes were more likely to have more deformable corneas and corneas in high myopia were easier to deform and were even softer compared with those in the mild/moderate myopia.

Introduction and Clinical Validation of an Updated Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure bIOP (v2)

Purpose To improve the stability of the Corvis ST biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements (bIOP) after refractive surgery and its independence of corneal biomechanics. Methods A parametric study was carried out using numerical models simulating the behavior of the eye globe under the effects of IOP and Corvis ST external air pressure and used to develop a new algorithm for bIOP; bIOP(v2). It was tested on 528 healthy participants to evaluate correlations with CCT and age. Its ability to compensate for the geometrical changes was tested in 60 LASIK and 80 SMILE patients with six months follow up. The uncorrected Corvis ST IOP (CVS-IOP) and the two versions of biomechanically corrected IOP; bIOP(v1) and bIOP(v2), were compared. Results In the healthy dataset, bIOP(v2) had weak and non-significant correlation with both CCT (R = −0.048, p = .266) and age (R = 0.085, p = .052). For bIOP(v1), the correlation was non-significant with CCT (R = −0.064, p = .139) but significant with age (R = −0.124, p < .05). In both LASIK and SMILE groups, the median change in bIOP(v2) following surgery was below 1 mmHg at follow-up stages and the interquartile range was smaller than both bIOP(v1) and CVS-IOP. Conclusion The bIOP(v2) algorithm performs better than bIOP(v1) and CVS-IOP in terms of correlation with CCT and age. The bIOP(v2) also demonstrated the smallest variation after LASIK and SMILE refractive surgeries indicating improved ability to compensate for geometrical changes.

Effect of myopia and astigmatism deepening on the corneal biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in individuals of Chinese ethnicity.

Purpose: To investigate the differences in corneal biomechanical parameter stress-strain index (SSI) among different degrees of myopic eyes in Chinese individuals and to analyze the relevant factors of the SSI. Methods: This study analyzed the right eyes of 240 participants (240 eyes) aged 18-34years. The participants were divided into low-, moderate-, high-, and ultra-high myopia groups according to their spherical equivalent (SE), with 60 eyes included in each group. Spherical, cylinder, and SE were measured via automatically integrated optometry. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a non-contact tonometer. AL was measured using an IOLMaster device. Corneal curvature and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured using a Pentacam. SSI and biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP) were measured via corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST). The statistical analyses included one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and normal distribution histogram methods, Levene variance homogeneity tests, Pearson's correlation analyses, multiple linear stepwise regression analyses, one-way ANOVA, and LSD t-tests. Results: The mean (±SD) age of the 240 participants was (24.97 ± 4.16) years. The SSI was positively correlated with spherical, cylinder, SE, CCT, IOP, and bIOP and negatively correlated with K1 and AL (r = 0.475, 0.371, 0.497, 0.169, 0.291, 0.144, -0.154, and -0.464, respectively; all p < 0.05), but were not correlated with age, K2, or Km (all p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis performed with SSI as the dependent variable, and spherical, cylinder, K1, CCT, and IOP as independent variables produced the following regression equation: SSI = 0.989 + 0.017 spherical + 0.042 cylinder +0.018 IOP (R 2 = 0.402, F = 31.518, p < 0.001). The SSI values in the low-, moderate-, high-, and ultra-high myopia groups were 0.945 ± 0.135, 0.940 ± 0.128, 0.874 ± 0.110, and 0.771 ± 0.104, respectively. The values decreased sequentially, and the differences between pairs were statistically significant (all p < 0.05), except for that between the low- and moderate-myopia groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: SSI decreased with increasing myopia and astigmatism in the Chinese participants. The SSI was significantly lower in high and ultra-high myopia, especially ultra-high myopia. These findings indicate that increased corneal elasticity may be related to the pathogenesis of high and ultra-high myopia.

Repeatability of a Scheimpflug tonometer to measure biomechanical parameters before and after myopic refractive surgery

To assess the repeatability of several corneal biomechanical parameters with a Scheimpflug tonometer (Corvis ST) in myopic eyes and eyes that underwent transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK), small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), or femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery. Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. Prospective randomized controlled study. 315 eyes from 315 patients (135 myopes, 58 post-transPRK, 52 post-SMILE, and 70 post-FS-LASIK) were included. 3 consecutive scans were performed to evaluate the repeatability of the 40 parameters examined. 315 eyes were included. In all eyes, the coefficient of variation (CoV) for intraocular pressure (IOP) and biomechanical-corrected IOP (bIOP) ranged from 7.29% to 9.47% and 6.11% to 7.75%, respectively; the CoV of pachymetry was <0.8%. The intraclass correlation coefficient of Corvis Biomechanical Index-Laser Vision Correction (LVC) was 0.680 for post-transPRK, 0.978 for post-SMILE, and 0.911 for post-FS-LASIK. The CoV of Stress-Strain Index (SSI) was 204.93% for post-transPRK, 91.92% for post-SMILE, and 171.72% for post-FS-LASIK. The CoV of the 6 clinically important dynamic corneal response parameters ranged from 2.0% to 7.8% for myopia, 1.8% to 11.1% for post-transPRK, 2.1% to 8.7% for post-SMILE, and 1.8% to 8.8% for post-FS-LASIK. Excellent intrameasurement repeatability of IOP, bIOP, and pachymetry was observed in all groups; SSI measurement in post-LVC corneas displayed more variation. Caution is warranted when assessing SSI in post-LVC corneas for the purpose of diagnosing iatrogenic ectasia or evaluating biomechanical remodeling of postoperative refractive corneas.

Repeatability and comparison of Corvis ST parameters before and after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking in keratoconus eyes

AIM: To evaluate the repeatability and comparison of corneal visualization scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST) parameters in keratoconus eyes before and after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking (ATE-CXL). METHODS: Thirty eyes of 30 progressive keratoconus patients were included in the prospective study. Three repeated corneal biomechanical measurements were performed preoperatively and one month postoperatively by Corvis ST. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), Cronbach’ α, repeatability coefficient (RC), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to evaluate the repeatability of Corvis ST parameters. Paired t test or Wilcoxon rank test was used to evaluate the differences between preoperative and postoperative data. RESULTS: At preoperative, 26 of 39 (66.67%) parameters showed good to excellent repeatability, 6 (15.38%) showed moderate, and 7 (17.95%) showed poor repeatability. Similarly, 34 (87.18%) parameters showed good to excellent repeatability, 3 (7.69%) showed moderate, and 2 (5.13%) showed poor repeatability after ATE-CXL. After ATE-CXL 1mo, the intraocular pressure (IOP), biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP), first applanation time (A1T), Radius, deformation amplitude at the first applanation (A1DA), deflection length at the maximum deformation (HCDLL) and stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP A1) parameters increased, while the steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Kmean), second applanation time (A2T), DA Ratio Max (2 mm) and integrated radius parameters decreased (all P&lt;0.05). CONCLUSION: The repeatability of the Corvis ST parameters before and 1mo ATE-CXL follow up were both acceptable, and the corneal stiffness was improved after 1-month ATE-CXL.

Association between Corneal Stiffness Parameter at the First Applanation and Keratoconus Severity.

Objective The study aimed to evaluate the character of corneal stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1) in normal and keratoconus eyes and explore the association between SP-A1 and keratoconus severity indicators. Methods A total of 351 normal and 351 keratoconus eyes were included in the current study. Keratoconus was diagnosed according to the corneal topography map and slit-lamp examination. The severity of keratoconus was classified to mild (steep keratometry (Ks) < 48D), moderate (48 ≤ Ks < 55D), and severe (Ks ≥ 55D). The SP-A1 was measured using the Corvis ST software. The correlation analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed in the current analysis. ResultsThe SP-A1 values of keratoconus were lower than that of normal eyes (72.11 (57.02, 83.08) mmHg/mm vs 110.89 (100.45, 122.47) mmHg/mm, P < 0.001). With the severity of keratoconus increasing, the SP-A1 decreased and the value of SP-A1 was 79.54 (70.30, 90.93) mmHg/mm, 65.11 (53.14, 77.46) mmHg/mm, and 47.59 (37.50, 62.14) mmHg/mm in mild, moderate, and severe keratoconus eyes, respectively (P < 0.001). The negative association between SP-A1 and Ks was found in mild, moderate, and severe keratoconus eyes (r mild = -0.171, rmoderate = -0.317, rsevere = −0.288, all P < 0.05). A positive association between SP-A1 and the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) was found in all eyes (rnormal = 0.687, rmild = 0.519, rmoderate = 0.488, rsevere = 0.382, all P < 0.05). SP-A1 was found to be statistically positively associated with intraocular pressure (IOP), biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP), time from the initiation of air puff until the first applanation (A1T), corneal velocity at the second applanation (A2V), and negatively associated with deformation amplitude (DA), peak distance (PD), corneal velocity at the first applanation (A1V), time from the initiation of air puff until the second applanation (A2T), and DA Ratio Max [2 mm] both in normal and keratoconus eyes (all P < 0.05). The ROC analysis indicated that the AUC (95% CI) of SP-A1 was 0.952 (0.934–0.967) and 0.930 (0.904–0.951) in detecting keratoconus eyes and mild keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, respectively. Conclusions The SP-A1 value decreased while the keratoconus severity increased. It was lower in keratoconus than that in normal eyes and could be helpful in identifying keratoconus eyes from normal eyes. Further researches would be warranted to expand the clinical utility of SP-A1.

Effect of biomechanical properties on myopia: a study of new corneal biomechanical parameters

BackgroundTo assess the corneal stress-strain index (SSI), which is a marker for material stiffness and corneal biomechanical parameters, in myopic eyes.MethodsA total of 1054 myopic patients were included in this study. Corneal visualisation Scheimpflug technology was used to measure the SSI. Corneal biomechanics were assessed using the first and second applanation times (A1-and A2-times); maximum deflection amplitude (DefAmax); deflection area (HCDefArea); the highest concavity peak distance (HC-PD), time (HC-time), and deflection amplitude (HC-DefA); integrated radius (IR); whole eye movement (WEM); stiffness parameter (SP-A1;, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (BIOP); and Corvis biomechanical index (CBI). Scheimpflug tomography was used to obtain the mean keratometery (Km) and central corneal thickness (CCT). According to the spherical equivalent (SE) (low myopia: SE ≥ − 3.00D and high myopia: SE ≤ − 6.00D.), the suitable patients were divided into two groups.ResultsThe mean SSI value was 0.854 ± 0.004. The SSI had a positive correlation with A1-time ((r = 0.272), HC-time (r = 0.218), WEM (r = 0.288), SP-A1 (r = 0.316), CBI (r = 0.199), CCT (r = 0.125), bIOP (r = 0.230), and SE (r = 0.313) (all p-values<0.01). The SSI had a negative correlation with HCDefA (r = − 0.721), HCDefArea (r = − 0.665), HC-PD(r = − 0.597), IR (r = − 0.555), DefAmax (r = − 0.564), and Km (r = − 0.103) (all p-values<0.01). There were significant differences in SSI (t = 8.960, p<0.01) and IR (t = − 3.509, p<0.01) between the low and high myopia groups.ConclusionsIn different grades of myopia, the SSI values were lower in eyes with higher SEs. It indicates that the mechanical strength of the cornea may be compromised in high myopia. The SSI was positively correlated with the spherical equivalent, and it may provide a new way to study the mechanism of myopia.

Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes

To evaluate the repeatability of corneal biomechanical parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes, and explore factors that affects the repeatability, and further assess the diagnostic ability of new parameters. Seventy-seven keratoconus eyes of 47 patients and 77 right eyes of 77 normal subjects were recruited in current study. All participants received three repeated measurements with 2 to 5 minutes interval. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach’ α and repeatability coefficient (RC) were evaluated. The liner regression analysis was used to identify factors that affect the repeatability, and linear mixed effects model was performed to compare the parameters differences. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic ability of new parameters. Eighteen parameters in normal eyes and twenty-two parameters in keratoconus eyes showed excellent repeatability (ICC ≥ 0.90). Age, axial measurement (AL), spherical equivalent, astigmatism, gender, mean keratometry (Kmean), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) could affect the repeatability of new Corvis ST parameters. Compared with normal eyes, the Ambrósio’s Relational Thickness horizontal (ARTh), biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP A1) were low and the Max Inverse Radius, deformation amplitude (DA) Ratio Max [2 mm], Pachy Slope, DA Ratio Max [1 mm], Integrated Radius and Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) were high in keratoconus eyes (All P < 0.05). Both ARTh and CBI had high Youden index (0.870), and the corresponding cut-off values were 379.29 and 0.44. The repeatability of Corvis ST parameters was acceptable both in normal and keratoconus eyes, and new parameters could effectively diagnose keratoconus eyes from normal eyes.

Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST.

Purpose To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), ocular response analyzer (ORA), dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and Corvis ST (CST) in healthy subjects. Methods In a prospective, observational study, IOP measurements with GAT (GAT-IOPc), ORA (IOPcc), DCT (DCT-IOP), and CST (bIOP) were performed and analyzed in 94 healthy subjects. Results Mean age of the participants was 45.6 ± 17.2 years (range 18 to 81 years). Mean GAT-IOPc was 12.9 ± 2.4 mmHg, mean DCT-IOP was 16.1 ± 2.6 mmHg, and mean IOPcc was 15.6 ± 3.3 mmHg. DCT-IOP and IOPcc were significantly higher than GAT-IOPc (P < 0.001). Mean bIOP was 13.5 ± 2.4 mmHg that was slightly higher but not significantly different from GAT-IOPc (P=0.146). Correlation analysis of IOP values and central corneal thickness (CCT) revealed a negative correlation between GAT-IOPc and CCT (r = −0.347; P=0.001). However, IOPcc, DCT-IOP, and bIOP showed no significant correlation to CCT. Only bIOP revealed a weak but significant age dependency (r = 0.321, P=0.002). Conclusion All tonometry devices showed a good agreement of biomechanical corrected IOP values with GAT-IOPc. As no influence of CCT on IOPcc, DCT-IOP, and bIOP was detectable, the used correction algorithms appear to be appropriate in these tonometers in the clinical setting. The highest agreement was found between GAT-IOPc and bIOP. However, bIOP weakly correlated with participants' age. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of bIOP for IOP measurement.

Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis

AimsCorvis ST (CST) yields biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP) which is purported to be less dependent on biomechanical properties. In our accompanied paper, it was suggested that the repeatability of bIOP...

Repeatability of the Novel Intraocular Pressure Measurement From Corvis ST.

PurposeTo assess the repeatability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Corvis ST (CST) and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA).MethodsA total of 141 eyes from 141 subjects were studied, including 35 healthy eyes and 106 glaucomatous eyes. All subjects underwent IOP evaluations with Goldmann applanation tonometer, CST, and ORA. With CST, biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP) was calculated; bIOP is purported to be less dependent on biomechanical properties. For ORA, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were derived. The repeatability of the various IOP values was assessed using the coefficient of variance (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe CV with bIOP (5.5 ± 3.1: mean ± standard deviation) was significantly smaller than the CVs measured with IOPg (7.3 ± 4.3) and IOPcc (7.2 ± 4.4). ICC values were 0.90, 0.80, and 0.86 with IOPg, IOPcc, and bIOP, respectively.ConclusionsThe bIOP showed a better prevision and repeatability for IOP measurement.Translational RelevanceThe bIOP measurement from CST had a better reproducible than IOPcc measurement from ORA.

Corneal deformation amplitude analysis for keratoconus detection through compensation for intraocular pressure and integration with horizontal thickness profile

BackgroundThe Corvis ST provides measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and a biomechanically-corrected IOP (bIOP). IOP influences corneal deflection amplitude (DA), which may affect the diagnosis of keratoconus. Compensating for IOP in DA values may improve the detection of keratoconus. Methods195 healthy eyes and 136 eyes with keratoconus were included for developing different approaches to distinguish normal and keratoconic corneas using attribute selection and discriminant function. The IOP compensation is proposed by dividing the DA by the IOP values. The first approaches include DA compensated for either IOP or bIOP and other parameters from the deformation corneal response (DCR). Another approach integrated the horizontal corneal thickness profile (HCTP). The best classifiers developed were applied in a validation database of 156 healthy eyes and 87 eyes with keratoconus. Results were compared with the current Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI). ResultsThe best biomechanical approach used the DA values compensated by IOP (Approach 2) using a linear discriminant function and reached AUC 0.954, with a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 97.4%. When thickness horizontal profile data was integrated (Approach 4), the best function was the diagquadratic, resulting in an AUC of 0.960, with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 96.4%. There was no significant difference in the results between approaches 2 and 4 with the CBI in the training and validation databases. ConclusionsBy compensating for the IOP, and with the horizontal thickness profile included or excluded, it was possible to generate a classifier based only on biomechanical information with a similar result to the CBI.

Non-contact tonometry using Corvis ST: analysis of corneal vibrations and their relation with intraocular pressure.

The aim of this study was to determine characteristic frequencies of corneal vibrations occurring during air-puff intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using the Corvis ST tonometer. Relations of frequency of the corneal vibrations with IOP were examined. Two selected vibration frequencies-frequency with maximum amplitude, and mass center of the frequency distribution area, for which the amplitude was higher than 50% (CM50)-present significant correlations with non-corrected IOP and biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP). The highest correlation was found between the mean values of CM50 and bIOP (r=0.91). Based on the results obtained, it can be stated that the vibration frequencies of corneal peaks are closely related to the measured non-corrected and biomechanical corrected IOPs.