The sources of airborne particulate matter (PM10) emissions in Ostrava, Czech Republic, were investigated. Emphasis was placed on their organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) contents, and their carbon stable isotope composition, δ13C. Emission sources were identified using OC-δ13C and concentration values. To track the extent of long-term deposition, these sources were also identified using the black carbon (BC) δ13C values of soil samples. At all sampling sites, wind flow is predominantly (65–80%) bidirectional in either SW-NE or NE-SW trajectories. Source apportionment along these dominant airflow trajectories was calculated from an isotopic 13C mass balance, and according to differences in the OC content and δ13C values of PM10. Determined emission sources are: (i) combustion of Silesian hard coal (δ13C = −24.5‰); (ii) local Ostrava coal combustion (δ13C = −25.5 to −26‰), automotive emissions (δ13C = −26.5‰), and biogenic particles (δ13C = −28 to −28.5‰). Winter emissions (mean OC concentrations from 12 to 25 μg m−3) originated mostly from coal combustion (80%) in domestic and industrial point sources. Differences were ascribed to automotive emissions. Ostrava is located near the Czech-Polish border, transboundary emissions are transported under a southbound wind flow that transported from 40 to 80% of the collected PM10. Summer emissions were lower (mean OC concentration from 6 to 8 μg m−3). Automotive emissions accounted for up to 40%, whilst biogenic production accounted for 60%. Absence of 13C isotope data of secondary OC (SOC 1.2–1.5 μg m−3) increases uncertainty in our source apportionment in summer; when SOC could comprise >20% of total OC. Contribution of SOC to the winter-measured OC is much lower (5–10%), and has no significant effect on mass balances. The upper soil layer analyses revealed long-term deposition of the same emissions sources. We conclude that the stable δ13C isotope values of OC and EC are useful for discriminating against local sources of PM10 pollution in relatively small urban areas, containing discrete polluting sources. Such a simplified approach can be easily standardized and implemented to manage regulatory compliances in the increasingly commoditized carbon offset market.
Read full abstract