In 1936 Bethe and Bacher and in 1938 Hafstad and Teller predicted that α particle structures could be present in atomic nuclei. In the course of developing a theory of nuclear structure based on the assumption of closest packing of clusters of nucleons, Linus Pauling found that the magic numbers have a very simple structural significance. He assumed that in nuclei the nucleons may, as a first approximation, be described as occupying localized 1s orbitals to form small clusters. These small clusters, called spherons, are usually helions (i.e. α particles), tritons and dineutrons. In nuclei containing an odd number of neutrons, an He3 cluster or a deuteron may serve as a spheron. The close-packed-spheron model differs from the conventional liquid-drop model of the nucleus in having spherons rather than nucleons as the units. This is a simplification: Gd154, for example, is described in terms of 45 spherons, rather than 154 nucleons. This enables to determine the binding energies in a much simpler way than the approach based on individual nucleons. I developed that idea, i.e. having clusters as basic bricks within the nucleus instead of nucleons. These clusters are the same than Pauling’s ones, i.e. α particles and deuterium, tritium, He3 and dineutrons like clusters. Nevertheless, on the method, my approach differs from that one of Pauling. I tried a simple method of mind experiments, approaching the problem step by step, nucleus after nucleus, isotope after isotope, looking each time at the preceding nucleus or isotope binding energy to compare with the next nucleus binding energy. My purpose is about LENR, i.e. looking for differences of binding energies between elements at the beginning and the end of the LENR process in order to determine the energy release. Indeed, my approach is looking for the distribution of binding energy within each element and each isotope, comparing their values, rather than researching for an internal structure of these elements. So, my approach is not about 3D structure of the nuclei but is rather based on an unidimensional value of their binding energy, looking for the internal distribution of that energy and trying to find distribution similarities between elements and isotopes. As a result, I could determine in a coherent way the binding energy of all stable nuclei and their isotopes on basis of the five clusters mentioned above and which are the same as those retained by Pauling. Indeed, I do not care about the geometrical structure of the packing of spherons, but rather about the organization of these spherons in order to determine for each element and isotope the binding energy characterizing it.
Read full abstract