Introduction: Cancer survivors have greater cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk through unclear mechanisms. Little is known about whether Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) metrics differ between persons with and without cancer and if the link between LS7 and CVD is similar in cancer survivors compared to persons without prior cancer. Hypothesis: Persons who develop cancer have poorer LS7 metrics compared to noncancer controls, and an ideal LS7 score is less protective against CVD events in persons with versus those without prior cancer. Methods: A total of 2950 ARIC participants who developed cancer were matched at the time of cancer diagnosis (incidence density sampling) on age, sex, race, and study center, to 5900 noncancer controls. We compared LS7 metrics in individuals who developed cancer (assessed prior to cancer diagnosis) and in matched controls. We used Cox regression to evaluate the prospective association between LS7 score and CVD events (coronary heart disease, heart failure or stroke) stratified by cancer status, with test for interaction between LS7 and cancer. Results: Compared to matched noncancer controls, those who developed cancer were less likely to have an ideal smoking history, body mass index, glucose control, physical activity levels, and diet (defined by LS7 metrics; Table ). Overall those with cancer were less likely to have an ideal LS7 score than noncancer controls (18 vs 23% p<0.0001). Compared to inadequate, an ideal LS7 score was similarly associated with lower CVD risk in persons with and without cancer (HRs 0.37 [95% CI: 0.26-0.52] and 0.40 [95% CI: 0.32-0.50], respectively), with no interaction between LS7 score and cancer status (p = 0.59). Conclusions: Individuals who develop cancer have poorer overall cardiovascular health as reflected by the LS7 score, but an ideal LS7 score is associated with similar cardio-protection in those with and without cancer. Cancer survivors may benefit from interventions targeting cardiovascular health metrics.
Read full abstract