BackgroundIt is unclear whether salivary iodine concentration (SIC) can assess iodine status in females from different water iodine regions. ObjectivesThrough a cross-sectional study, we explored the feasibility of SIC as a biomarker to assess iodine status in females and develop optimal cutoff values. MethodsA total of 1991 females were analyzed in this cross-sectional study from the coastal iodine-deficient areas (CIDAs), inland iodine-deficient areas (IIDAs), iodine-adequate areas (IAAs), iodine-excess areas (IEAs), and iodine extra-high areas (IEHAs). SIC, spot urine iodine concentration (SUIC), and daily total iodine intake (TII) were assessed, and ultrasonography was performed in all subjects. ResultsThere was a positive correlation between SIC and SUIC (r = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.69; P < 0.001), and TII (r = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.50; P < 0.001). The prevalence of thyroid nodules (TN) showed an upward trend with SIC increasing (Z = −2.83; P-trend = 0.005). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for SIC to assess iodine deficiency was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.65; P < 0.001) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.77; P < 0.001) for iodine excess. The cutoff values were as follows: SIC < 93.32 μg/L, iodine deficiency; 93.32–224.60 μg/L, iodine adequacy; and >224.60 μg/L, iodine excess. When SIC > 224.60 μg/L, the odds ratio (OR) for UIC > 300 μg/L, excessive TII, and the prevalence of TN were 6.44, 3.68, and 1.27 (95% CI: 4.98, 8.31; 2.83, 4.79; and 1.02, 1.56, respectively; P < 0.05); when SIC < 93.32 μg/L, the OR for UIC < 100 μg/L and insufficient TII were 2.34 and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.73, 3.14 and 1.33, 2.83, respectively; P < 0.05). ConclusionsUsing SIC as a biomarker, females in CIDA exhibited mild iodine deficiency, those in IIDA and IAA demonstrated moderate iodine deficiency, and those in IEA and IEHA exhibited an excess of iodine, consistent with SUIC to assess iodine status. SIC can be used as a good biomarker to evaluate the iodine status in population.