This paper summarizes the development status of air-cooled lithium bromide (LiBr)-water absorption chillers to guide future efforts to develop chillers for combined heat and power (CHP) applications in US light commercial buildings (typically 30 to 500 kWTh [10 to 150 RT]). The key technical barrier to air-cooled operation is the increased tendency for LiBr solutions to crystallize in the absorber when heat-rejection temperatures rise. Air-cooled LiBr-water absorption chillers/coolers have been analyzed, designed, and prototype- tested since at least the mid-1970s, primarily in Japan, the US, and Europe, for solar-fired and direct-fired applications. Developers have used several approaches, including chemistry changes to inhibit crystallization, improving heat and mass transfer to lower overall temperature lift, modifying the thermodynamic cycle, combining absorption with vapor compression to lower the temperature lift for each system, and advanced control systems to sense the onset of crystallization and take corrective action. Most air-cooled LiBr absorption development efforts of the past have not adequately addressed operation at high ambient temperatures. Vapor-compression equipment, which can typically deliver over 85% of rated capacity in ambient temperatures up to 50°C (120°F), sets the benchmark for performance expectations in US light-commercial markets. Several alternative design approaches that are not documented in the open literature are briefly considered here. Of these, the most promising appears to be intermittent evaporative cooling. If evaporative cooling is used only at extreme ambient temperatures, it may be possible to avoid many of the disadvantages of full-time evaporative cooling systems, such as high water consumption, high maintenance requirements, and risk of harboring Legionella. However, further evaluation of this approach is needed before drawing firm conclusions. There are other potentially viable approaches to eliminating the need for cooling towers in light-commercial CHP applications, such as LiBr absorption with ground-coupled heat rejection, ammonia-water absorption, adsorption/chemisorption, and Rankine cycles driving vapor-compression equipment. These approaches were outside the scope of our investigation but may warrant consideration.
Read full abstract