1075 PURPOSE: As part of a long-term effort (Foot Ankle, 20:12, 1999) to develop a diagnostic procedure for ankle ligament injuries, the effects of sectioning the anterior talofibular (ATFL) and calcaneofibular (CFL) ligaments on the load-displacement behavior of the ankle-subtalar joint complex were evaluated in vitro during anterior drawer and inversion rotation loading. METHODS: Eight fresh cadavers were tested using a portable instrumented arthrometer consisting of a load-measuring handle attached to a footplate and a 6-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage connecting an anterior tibial pad to the footplate. High validity coefficients (r = .86 – .88) for ankle arthrometry have been previously reported (J Athl Train 37:4, 2002). Motion (laxity) was measured as anterior displacement (AD) (mm) at 125 N of applied force and inversion rotation (IR) (degrees ROM) at 4 N-m of applied torque at neutral and 10° dorsi- and plantar flexion. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance compared AD and IR before and after serial sectioning of the ATFL and CFL. RESULTS: Both flexion angle and ligament sectioning affect laxity of the ankle-subtalar joint complex. Compared to the intact ankle, sectioning the ATFL increased anterior laxity for all 3 flexion angles (neutral: 7.1 ± 2.9 vs. 9.8 ± 3.2 mm; dorsiflexion: 7.2 ± 3.4 vs. 9.7 ± 4.7 mm; plantar flexion: 7.7 ± 3.0 vs. 9.07 ± 3.2 mm; p = .001), with no differences (p >.05) between flexion angles observed. Sequentially cutting the CFL did not significantly increase (p = .137) anterior laxity compared to the ATFL condition. During inversion loading, the ankle-subtalar joint complex was most lax in plantar flexion and most stable in dorsiflexion, with the greatest laxity differences observed between neutral and dorsiflexion (p = .04). Cutting the ATFL did not significantly increase inversion laxity compared to the intact condition across the 3 flexion angles. Whereas, sectioning the CFL increased inversion laxity significantly compared to the intact ankle (neutral: 16.3 ± 4.1 vs. 23.5 ± 9.3°; dorsiflexion: 15.2 ± 4.3 vs. 21.6 ± 8.8°; plantar flexion: 17.5 ± 5.2 vs. 25.3 ± 11.9°; p = .013) and ATFL injury condition (neutral: 17.4 ± 4.8 vs. 23.5 ± 9.3°; dorsiflexion: 14.8 ± 4.5 vs. 21.6 ± 8.8°; plantar flexion: 17.8 ± 5.4 vs. 25.3 ± 11.9°; p = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that arthrometric measurements provide a basis for differentiating between the intact ankle and isolated injury of the ATFL or combined ATFL and CFL injury.
Read full abstract