The essential feature of general permissive legal regulation, that is its focus on the maximum exercise of freedom within the existing legal order, presupposes a certain area of such regulation. This area covers a number of values, the embodiment of which depends on the corresponding amount of freedom, and they include the value of the human person (and the main components, such as life and health, honor and dignity, inviolability and security of man), democracy, local self-governance, civil society, etc. These social values “get” new opportunities for their implementation due to this type of legal regulation, since its main tools objectify the corresponding amount of freedom. These are legal prohibitions, obligations, and permissions that “accompany” and reflect the content and scope of a number of rights that guide the “general permissive process” of the embodiment of these values, such as the value of honor and dignity – the right to respect for human dignity; the right to privacy (which to a maximum extent reflects the interconnection of these values as paired categories, since they are fixed in the Constitution); other rights that determine “decent conditions of human life”. This makes it possible to clarify under conditions of general permissive regulation the content and scope of different types of rights, and therefore – different types of freedom, for example: 1) economic freedom (“decent economic living conditions”) taking into account the following correlations: a) dignity and freedom of property, freedom of work, freedom of housing, , characterized by active human behavior and illustrating the maximum amount of freedom; b) dignity and minimum social standards – opportunities for social protection, and “sufficient standard of living”, which on the contrary determine the “active role” of the In this regard such issues occur as the legal nature of certain legal prohibitions, obligations, permissions and their assessment through the prism of freedom, such as benefits (benefits, compensations) that are permissions and “enhancers” of economic freedom that perform the function of its preservation and restoration; positive obligations of the state that perform the function of obligations and “enhancers” of economic freedom; discretion of the state (legal permission as a specific restrictor of freedom), which presupposes the minimum permissible amount of such freedom; 2) ideological freedom («decent political and cultural conditions of life») and its maximum manifestation that covers the links between dignity and freedom of speech, conscience, education and language, etc. At the same time, specific legal instruments are revealed, such as qualification conditions and requirements as obligations that should be assessed through the prism of false restrictors of this type of freedom.
Read full abstract