“Betwixt and Between”: Juanita Harrison’s Black Internationalist Practice Owen Walsh (bio) How to identify a historical subject whose lived practice was resistant to almost every fixed identity? This is the conundrum one faces when attempting to introduce Juanita Harrison. Perhaps the most effective introduction is found on the cover of her 1936 book, My Great, Wide, Beautiful World, an epistolary narrative covering eight restless years (1927–1935), which saw her traverse much of the globe, and her only volume of published writing. The dust cover of the Macmillan Company edition (the book’s original and most widely read version) is dominated by a bold typography, behind which, arranged in a jumble, are numerous photographs of the elusive author posing in different forms of dress. The design informs the reader that the narrator of this travel narrative can provide access to the interior of whatever culture she enters. The eclecticism of her dress and the commanding tone of the title—taken from a poem by nineteenth-century English writer W.B. Rands—clearly communicates a confidence in her mobility and her understanding of the alien social worlds that she allows the American reader to glimpse. Harrison’s nationality and her racial identity are not easily deciphered from any of these pictures, and on reading the text one has the sense that she had little interest in satiating any popular or market-based demand for identitarian certainty. One of the intriguing features of the text is its repeated resistance to the imposed categorization of Harrison and to any spatial or experiential limitations. Interpellated in the American context as Black, Harrison’s years of travel saw her use the ethnic ambiguity of her appearance to deceive and delight her acquaintances. This practice of “racial disidentification” is the focus of this reading of Harrison’s life, accessed primarily through her book. The term is borrowed from Ifeoma Kiddoe Nwankwo, who has used it to [End Page 1] describe a technique of Black cosmopolitanism deployed in the aftermath of the Haitian Revolution.1 In a broader context, racial disidentification describes an attempt to distance oneself from Blackness and foster a non-Black identity. Racial disidentification’s difference from the more familiar “passing” lies in its de-emphasizing the attempt to be accepted as white. In Harrison’s case, the non-American contexts in which she operated should be seen as important reasons for that difference: Harrison could not have passed for white in America, but she had opportunities to pose in multiple racial and national guises elsewhere. Harrison’s “racial border crossing” therefore occurred in a context quite different from that addressed by Nwankwo, as she escaped America’s Jim Crow regime and moved restlessly across dozens of national borders.2 By its nature, racial disidentification is an individualistic practice, and it certainly does not always lend itself to a reading invested in recovering modes of African American political radicalism and global solidarity. But placing Harrison’s practice of racial disidentification in a proper ideological setting challenges any assumption that it is an apolitical or even conservative practice. Interpellation as theorized in the Althusserian tradition is a process in which ideology becomes manifest. In his classic exposition of the idea, Althusser takes the example of a police officer hailing an individual. By the individual’s recognition that they are the object of the gendarme’s attention and by their turning around in response, the individual becomes a subject implicated in an ideological order.3 One moment from Harrison’s book helps to draw this Althusserian link toward Black travel in the interwar years. When Harrison stayed brief ly in Stalin’s Moscow, she played out a scenario redolent of Althusser’s example. As she moved anarchically through the city (“cut[ting] across many places”) she was hailed by a policeman. Whereas Althusser’s imagined individual recognized themselves as the object of the gendarmes’ attention and turned, Harrison records that she ignored his whistle and “didnt even look back.”4 Throughout her text, Harrison engages in similar maneuvers that reject hegemonic ideological forces. Althusser’s interpellation can be linked to Nwankwo’s disidentification via a third discussant. Evelyn Rose Higginbotham has described—relying in...
Read full abstract