Organic electrosynthesis is regarded as a sustainable alternative to traditional organic synthesis as it enables replacement of stochiometric redox agents with electricity – which can be generated from renewable sources – and high product selectivity at ambient conditions [1]. However, the poor conductivity of the organic solvents typically requires the addition of large amounts of supporting electrolyte salts, leading to increased waste generation and lowered atom economy of the process.Alternative solvents such as room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) and deep eutectic solvents (DESs) represent a promising alternative electrolyte and solvent in electrosynthesis. They are conducting, non-volatile and able to solubilize several organic compounds as well as easily separated from products by extraction and thus prone for reuse [2-4]. In addition, they have a tunable, large electrochemical window and this has already led to their use as electrolytes in other fields of electrochemistry, including batteries, electrochromic devices, supercapacitors and in electrodeposition processes [5-6].DESs offer some advantages compared to RTILs, including that their synthesis is comparable inexpensive and simple, requiring no purification. In addition, some of the DES are biodegradable. DESs have already been use in organic synthesis as solvents and catalysts, however only few examples use DESs as electrolyte systems in organic electrosynthesis despite their advantageous properties. DESs can also solubilize untreated biomass and biomass components, and thus they are attractive solvents for several biorefinery processes including pretreatment, fractionation, and catalytic conversion [7]. Selective reductive transformations are key in biomass valorization to yield precursors for fuels and chemicals.In this work, we show how DESs can play a dual role as solvent and electrolyte for reductive transformations of organic compounds. The physical and electrochemical properties of the DESs and their role in the reaction are investigated. In addition, the feasibility of reusing the DES over several reactions is examined.[1] Frontana-Uribe, B.A.; Little, R. D.; Ibanez, J. G.; Palma, A. & Vasquez-Medrano, R. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 2099-2119.[2] Singh, S. K. & Savoy, A. W. J. Mol. Liquids 2020, 297, 1120938[3] Hansen, B. B.; Spittle, S.; Chen, B.; Poe, D.; Zhang; Y., Klein; J. M.; Horton, A.; Adhikari, L.; Zelovich, T.; Doherty, B. W.; Gurkan, B.; Maginn, E. J.; Ragauskas, A.; Dadmun, M.; Zawodzinski, T. A.; Baker, G. A.; Tuckerman, M. E.; Savinell, R. F. & Sangoro, J. R. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1232–1285.[4] Kathiresan, M., & Velayutham, D. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 17499.[5] Armand, M.; Endres, F.; MacFarlane, D. R.; Ohno, H. & Scrosati, B. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 621–629.[6] Abbott, A. P. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 36, 100649.[7] Wang, Y.; Kim, K. H.; Jeong, K.; Kim, N. K.; Yoo, C. G. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 27, 100396.
Read full abstract