PURPOSE: The present study investigated the effects of a single bout of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous, moderate aerobic exercise (MAE) on inhibitory control. METHODS: The P3 component of an event-related brain potential was collected in 64 young adults during a modified flanker task following 20 minutes of seated rest, 20 minutes of MAE, and 9 minutes of HIIT on separate days in counterbalanced order. RESULTS: Shorter overall reaction time was observed following MAE (392.2ms) and HIIT (384.8ms) compared to seated rest (402.6ms), t’s(63) ≥ 2.8, p’s ≤ .007. Response accuracy selectively improved following HIIT (93.2%) in the task condition requiring greater inhibitory control compared to seated rest (91.1%) and MAE (91.3%), t’s(63) ≥ 3.0, p’s ≤ .004. P3 amplitude was larger following MAE (14.4μV) compared to seated rest (13.1μV) and HIIT (11.6μV), t’s(63) ≥ 2.7, p’s ≤ .007. Decreased P3 amplitude and shorter latency were observed following HIIT (11.6μV; 393.6ms) compared to seated rest (13.1μV; 405.4ms), t’s(63) ≥ 2.6, p’s ≤ .012. CONCLUSION: The current results indicated that MAE may facilitate cognitive control via increased neural resource allocation, whereas HIIT may have a larger facilitation on cognitive control beyond MAE via more efficient neural resource allocation. These findings demonstrate that both single bouts of MAE and HIIT may be feasible approaches to enhance cognitive performance, albeit via different mechanisms of neural activation.
Read full abstract