Joseph E. TaylorIII Master of the Seas? Herbert Hooverandthe Western Fisheries erBert Hoover has been a slippery historical figure. He has been caricatured as the savior of Belgium or the man who sicced Douglas MacArthur on the Bonus March ers, and mythic images of him run the gamut from Great Humanitarian to bloodless misanthrope. Hoover remains a challenge to historians, however, because most Americans prefer these distortions. Po litically speaking, cardboard Hoovers are more useful for lionizing or damning policies without offeringmuch useful explanation for the actual course of events. Meanwhile, scholars divine Hoover primarily through his philosophies and context? that is, they tend to know Hoover more bywhat he said than bywhat he did and more as an exemplar of Republi can ideals and policies during the 1920s than as an individual trying to wield power. It is as though words mattered more than deeds and party more than politician. This is a poor way to understand Hoover and his times. Rather than seeing him as a grand architect or a bit player, we should view him as one ofmany actors, all of whom were significantly constrained by institutional, social, and environmental forces. One way to recapture the complexity and contradictions ofHoover's circumstances is to examine his management of the fisheries in thewestern United States during his tenure as commerce secretary during the 1920s.1 Although Hoover has been popularly portrayed as a conservation leader and champion of science, his legacy is more complex. He did tryto regulate business innew ways, but his fisheries policies more often echoed those of earlier conservationists. Even so, few historians consider Hoover a Progressive conservationist.2 In the historiography, progressive vies with laissez-faire fundamentalist, associationalist, and proto-New Dealer.3 His OHQ vol. 105, no. 1 ? 2004 Oregon Historical Society OHS neg.,CN 011502 Herbert Hoover, shown here on Oregons McKenzie River in July 1953,was an avid, life-long angler. He served as honorary president of the Izaak Walton League during the 1920s and wrote A Remedy for Disappearing Game Fishers, published in 1930, to advocate for game fish conservation. His management of the United States Bureau of Fisheries while he was secretary of commerce gave him oversight of industrial fisheries, the complexity and conten tiousness ofwhich he never fully grasped. torians' lack of consensus in this regard seems less a function of indecision or partisanship than of Hoover's protean actions. The philosophies of Hoover, Congress, and the presidential administrations during the 1920s did encourage policies that deemphasized governmental regulation of in dustries, but environmental contingencies and industry conflicts often forced less than orthodox responses.4 There is no simple way to explain how Hoover actually governed based on a deductive reading of his ideals or a Republican party platform. Similarly, although Hoover's reputation as a champion of science meshes well with his image as theGreat Engineer, a study of his oversight of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries (USBF) exposes critical nuances in his conception of the proper use of science. Not all science was equal inhis eyes, and the ensuing discrepancies inbureau prac tices, largely shaped by Hoover's engineering bias for practical and ap plied approaches, made for an uneven and expensive legacy of govern ment fishery science.5 The effect of Hoover's policies on thewestern fisheries was problem atic. Paralleling his efforts to fix industries that he characterized as "sick," such as bituminous coal and lumber, Hoover tried to protect fish,mold Taylor,Master of the Seas? 41 scientific studies, and reorganize industry through an associationalist ap proach that sought what historian David Kennedy calls "a spontaneously mutualistic society inhabited by virtuous, public-spirited citizens."6 Hoover fervently wanted to reduce the size of government, and he be lieved thatmany of itsduties could be delegated to responsible members of private industry. In the fisheries, however, his efforts did not somuch create new solutions as elaborate and exacerbate existing trends.Most of the policies, legislation, and treaties that he supported followed ruts that were well worn by the time he arrived in Washington, D.C.; and because he changed little, little changed in thewestern fisheries. Hoover did help rationalize some production and distribution sectors...
Read full abstract