Abstract
This short paper clears up three misunderstandings about machine philosophy. First, machine philosophy does not demand computational or formal philosophy. Instead, it only calls for a grounding of philosophical theorising in statistical learning, not that philosophy must proceed by means of statistical learning. Second, machine philosophy does not entail the collapse of metaphysics. In fact, it doesn’t affect metaphysics more than any other philosophical field. Third, while machine philosophy potentially entails the illegitimacy of widely discussed philosophical problems, this consideration isn’t a worry for machine philosophy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
