Abstract
Ostrom’s design principles have been broadly used to analyse the governance of common pool resources. However, they are normally assessed as present or absent. We challenge this assumption by considering them as fuzzy sets where membership scores range from 0 to 1, because, in real situations, the design principles can be present at a certain level. We define categories to assess the level of membership and apply it to a single case study analysing how changes in water policy can affect the community-based management of the Water User Association of Mondomo (Colombia). In rural areas of Colombia, most water and sanitation services are provided by water user associations, wherein civil society has developed governance systems based on active citizen involvement and community-based management. Some of these associations have been operating for decades and are essential pillars of the local social fabric. However, recent changes in the country’s policy and legal framework threaten these long-lasting governance systems. The results show that most of the design principles would suffer important changes that undermine the governance system. Essential principles for sustainable community-based governance, such as the congruence of the rules with local conditions, the local monitoring and sanctioning capacities, the internal conflict-resolution mechanisms and the recognition of the rights to organize, are dramatically reduced after the policy implementation.
Highlights
Water is at the core of sustainable development, as recognised by Sustainable DevelopmentGoal 6 [1]
We found inspiration in the coding system proposed by Ratajczyk et al [45], based on the codes established by Ostrom et al [46] in the Common Pool Resources Coding Manual, but we proposed our own definition of the categories that represent potential situations in the governance systems of common pool resources
The results provide evidences on how the policy regulations and actions might hamper highly empowered local governance systems, and negatively affect long-lasting, effective collective-choice rules, and monitoring and sanctioning processes [57]
Summary
Water is at the core of sustainable development, as recognised by Sustainable DevelopmentGoal 6 [1]. Water is at the core of sustainable development, as recognised by Sustainable Development. The range of services they provide, underpin poverty reduction, economic growth and environmental sustainability. This situation has forced citizens to develop alternative governance systems to secure their access to water [3]. Governance has been defined as a way of collectively managing social relations to define or allocate possible resources [4,5] between public or private actors to obtain mutual gains while
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
