Abstract

Emerging RRI practices have goals with respect to learning, governance and achieving RRI outcomes (action). However, few practices actually achieve the action phase as actors lack room to manoeuvre, and lack guidance on how to move forward because of the inherent unscriptedness of the emerging RRI practice. In this explorative research an emerging RRI practice is studied to identify factors and barriers to the creation of adaptive space, in which actors can be responsive to the other and adapt, and a narrative can be created in the act of doing. This paper describes how formal and informal ways of organizing emerging RRI practices contribute to adaptive space, and how the metaphorical heuristic of improvisational theatre provides clear action principles to actors involved in emerging RRI practices in action. The RRI practice studied here lies in the domain of juvenile justice, where barriers that restrict room to manoeuvre are abundant. Five factors – ‘informality over formality’, ‘shared action space’, ‘be flexible’, ‘keep the action moving’ and ‘put the relationship central’ – were identified to facilitate reflexivity and adaptation in this space.

Highlights

  • A key question to the governance of science and technologies in society is how to influence trajectories when negative impacts can be anticipated

  • The goal of this paper is to explore factors relating to the creation of adaptive space to gain insights into how Research and Innovation (RRI) practices in action can be created

  • Despite the demanding conditions and the conflicting systems of science and juvenile justice, they were able to include a large number of subjects into the study, even though they faced the unforeseen closure of two of the five Juvenile justice institution (JJI), with the accompanied drop in new placements of adolescents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A key question to the governance of science and technologies in society is how to influence trajectories when negative impacts can be anticipated. As normative choices are being made throughout the entire research and technology development process and during the societal implementation phase, these aspects deserve consideration from the early stages onward. This is a key aspect in the emerging framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). RRI has been gaining traction from 2000 onwards in science policy in the EU and US as well as in the academic fields of policy and innovation studies (Owen et al 2012, von Schomberg 2014) It stresses the importance of early inclusion of societal stakeholders, such as practitioners and social scientists, to enrich the research and innovation process from the outset (von Schomberg 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call