Abstract

Since 2008, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has called the military family “the strength behind the uniform.” The contributions and sacrifices of military families, and in particular spouses, are now formally recognized as essential to operational effectiveness, such as the ability to deploy troops quickly and easily. This represents a departure from previous eras, which took for granted the “naturalness” of a gendered division of labour in military households in support of organizational goals. Making visible and valuing this work parallels recent efforts by the CAF to improve the wellbeing of its people and advance gender equality in the organization and on operations. This article considers the gendered labour and power implications of formally recognizing the contributions of military families and spouses to the CAF. What does recognizing the military family as “the strength behind the uniform” mean for women and the gendered labour relations in military families? By drawing on analyses of policies, programs, and institutional rhetoric, alongside interviews by military family members, the article argues that in formally recognizing the family’s contribution to operational effectiveness, the CAF is co-opting the labour and loyalty of women spouses in military families. The institutional emphasis on “taking care of its people” obscures the ways in which the service required of military families is gendered and relies on women being constrained by traditional gender norms. These findings have implications for the genuine wellbeing of military families and for assessing feminist progress, or lack thereof, within the CAF institution.

Highlights

  • Since 2008, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has called the military family “the strength be­ hind the uniform.” e contributions and sacrifices of military families, and in particular spouses, are formally recognized as essential to operational effectiveness, such as the ability to deploy troops quickly and . is represents a departure from previous eras, which took for granted the “natural­ ness” of a gendered division of labour in military households in support of organizational goals

  • Policies aimed at partnering with military families and supporting them through military separation, normal­ ize a gendered division of labour in military family life, in particular the downloading of dependent care onto civilian spouses in the name of operational effectiveness

  • She will find ways to get through deploy­ ment smoothly, provide a stable home life, and nurture family relationships, and will care for her in­ jured and ill partner when required. e unpaid la­ bour provided in military marriages is essential to operational effectiveness and to the wellbeing of its members and has become a matter of military con­ cern through the CAF’s increased attention to and partnership with military families. e military spouse’s incorporation into the institution has been furthered by support for military marriages, character­ ized by patriarchal dynamics and feminized practices of care

Read more

Summary

Explore this journal

Cite this article Spanner, L. “The Strength behind the Uniform”: Acknowledging the Contributions of Military Families or Co-Opting Women’s Labour?

Article abstract
Ensuring Operationally Ready Families
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call