Abstract

Although feminist scholars agree that there exists a systemic relationship between masculinity and militarism, the exact contours of that relationship are debatable. Most feminists argue that as a primary goal, the women’s movement ought to seek approaches for the abolition of militarism, rather than using women’s participation in the military as a means of enhancing gender equality. Despite admonitions about the dangers of pursuing gender equality through military service, feminists must also weigh these concerns against women’s advances within the military and the use of the military in peacekeeping and humanitarian operations, both of which are essential to the Women, Peace and Security agenda. This article therefore turns a critical feminist lens on theories of military re-gendering. I explore whether military organizations that have traditionally valorized militarized masculinity can be transformed—both at an individual and systemic level—to embrace an egalitarian iteration of masculinity and contribute to a more peaceable international system. To examine the possibility of regendering in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), I review 17 interviews that I conducted with members of the CAF from 2017-2018 using theories of military regendering. My analysis indicates that servicemembers are engaging in critical examination of the military’s gender culture, and their position within that culture. By critically engaging with questions about the relationship between gender and militarism, military personnel may be participating in the incremental—and fragile—process of improving the gender culture of the CAF.

Highlights

  • Feminist scholars agree that there exists a systemic relationship between masculinity and militarism, the exact contours of that relationship are debatable

  • In this paper I analyze 17 semi­structured interviews I conducted with Regular and Reserve Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) personnel in late 2017, through 2018. ese semi­structured in­ terviews lasted approximately one hour and focused on understanding how UNSCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security has been framed and communic­ ated to CAF personnel as part of my larger, related project on norm translation in the CAF and the Cana­ dian WPS agenda. e interviews provided an opportunity to discuss the suite of CAF initiatives aimed at integrating gender and changing military culture, including Operation HONOUR and Gender­based Analysis Plus (GBA+)

  • All 17 participants responded in ways that I coded as positive when asked, “Generally speaking, what do you think about women serving in the combat arms?” We can discern that, in the most basic sense, the participants have no opposi­ tion to women in combat roles and in the CAF more generally. e second question asked, “When Canada sends troops on a United Nations mission, should one or more of the authorized positions be reserved for Gender Advisors (GENADS)—and do you think they should be women, men, or either?” GENADS are Ca­ nadian military personnel trained to advise command­ ing officers, peers, and subordinates on gender­based issues in operations, training, and personnel policies within the CAF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Feminist scholars agree that there exists a systemic relationship between masculinity and militarism, the exact contours of that relationship are debatable. Feminist security scholars see the issue of human rights abuses during warfare—and warfare itself—as systemic issues; these abuses are im­ bricated in the militarized international system itself (Cockburn 2011; Eichler 2014; Enloe 2014, 2014; Sjoberg 2013; Sjoberg and Via 2010; Whitworth 2004) From this perspective, war crimes are rooted in the larger historical trajectory of patriarchy; an inegal­ itarian gender order that ensures the dominance of men and the subservience of women through socio­ historically contextual gender norms. Within this view of the mil­ itary, relying on the armed forces to assist in the pur­ suit of a more egalitarian, peaceable international order may seem an unlikely approach

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call