Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of two constraints on the linear order of constituents in German preschool children’s and adults’ speech production: a rhythmic (*LAPSE, militating against sequences of unstressed syllables) and a semantic one (ANIM, requiring animate referents to be named before inanimate ones). Participants were asked to produce coordinated bare noun phrases in response to picture stimuli (e.g., Delfin und Planet, ‘dolphin and planet’) without any predefined word order. Overall, children and adults preferably produced animate items before inanimate ones, confirming findings of Prat-Sala, Shillcock, and Sorace (2000). In the group of preschoolers, the strength of the animacy effect correlated positively with age. Furthermore, the order of the conjuncts was affected by the rhythmic constraint, such that disrhythmic sequences, i.e., stress lapses, were avoided. In both groups, the latter result was significant when the two stimulus pictures did not vary with respect to animacy. In sum, our findings suggest a stronger influence of animacy compared to rhythmic well-formedness on conjunct ordering for German speaking children and adults, in line with findings by McDonald, Bock, and Kelly (1993) who investigated English speaking adults.

Highlights

  • The transmission of thought into speech involves the retrieval of appropriate lexical items and their ordering according to the rules of syntax

  • Discussion of Experiment 1 In Experiment 1 we set out to test whether animacy (ANIM) and rhythm (*LAPSE) have an impact on the ordering of nouns in conjoined phrases in the speech production of German preschoolers

  • Experiment 2 was a replication of Experiment 1 conducted with young adult participants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The transmission of thought into speech involves the retrieval of appropriate lexical items and their ordering according to the rules of syntax. Semantic as well as phonological constraints are known to affect such word order decisions in speech production, and they do so to varying degrees. Spontaneous language use, semantic constraints presumably control word order more immediately and to a stronger degree than phonological constraints. This follows from the logical directionality of language production, in which the semantic content of the message governs lexical choice and the assignment of syntactic function; phonology can exert its role and endow the structure with sound only once a syntactic scaffold has been constructed (Levelt, 1989). Phonological influences on word order are on record (Breiss & Hayes, 2020; Büring, 2013; see Anttila, 2016 for a review), but they appear to be limited to sub-clausal environments (Kentner & Franz, 2019)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call