Some Remarks on Models of Plankton Densities in Lakes

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsSome Remarks on Models of Plankton Densities in LakesMarino GattoMarino Gatto Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 137, Number 2Feb., 1991 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285159 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 29Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1991 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Anne Willem Omta, Elizabeth A. Heiny, Harshana Rajakaruna, David Talmy, Michael J. Follows Trophic model closure influences ecosystem response to enrichment, Ecological Modelling 475 (Jan 2023): 110183.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110183Sajjad Hossain, Md. Manarul Haque, M. Humayun Kabir, M. Osman Gani, Sahabuddin Sarwardi Complex spatiotemporal dynamics of a harvested prey–predator model with Crowley–Martin response function, Results in Control and Optimization 5 (Dec 2021): 100059.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2021.100059Mark A. McPeek Limiting Similarity? The Ecological Dynamics of Natural Selection among Resources and Consumers Caused by Both Apparent and Resource Competition, The American Naturalist 193, no.44 (Jan 2019): E92–E115.https://doi.org/10.1086/701629Mark A. McPeek Mechanisms influencing the coexistence of multiple consumers and multiple resources: resource and apparent competition, Ecological Monographs 89, no.11 (Aug 2018): e01328.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1328Lakshmi Narayan Guin, Sattwika Acharya Dynamic behaviour of a reaction–diffusion predator–prey model with both refuge and harvesting, Nonlinear Dynamics 88, no.22 (Jan 2017): 1501–1533.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3326-8Peter A. Abrams Why ratio dependence is (still) a bad model of predation, Biological Reviews 90, no.33 (Aug 2014): 794–814.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12134Frédéric Barraquand Functional responses and predator–prey models: a critique of ratio dependence, Theoretical Ecology 7, no.11 (Oct 2013): 3–20.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-013-0201-9Mark A. McPeek Keystone and Intraguild Predation, Intraspecific Density Dependence, and a Guild of Coexisting Consumers., The American Naturalist 183, no.11 (Jul 2015): E1–E16.https://doi.org/10.1086/674010Mark A. McPeek Intraspecific density dependence and a guild of consumers coexisting on one resource, Ecology 93, no.1212 (Dec 2012): 2728–2735.https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0797.1Mainul Haque A detailed study of the Beddington–DeAngelis predator–prey model, Mathematical Biosciences 234, no.11 (Nov 2011): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2011.07.003D. L. Breitburg, J. K. Craig, R. S. Fulford, K. A. Rose, W. R. Boynton, D. C. Brady, B. J. Ciotti, R. J. Diaz, K. D. Friedland, J. D. Hagy, D. R. Hart, A. H. Hines, E. D. Houde, S. E. Kolesar, S. W. Nixon, J. A. Rice, D. H. Secor, T. E. Targett Nutrient enrichment and fisheries exploitation: interactive effects on estuarine living resources and their management, Hydrobiologia 629, no.11 (Apr 2009): 31–47.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9762-4Gurbir Perhar, George B. Arhonditsis The effects of seston food quality on planktonic food web patterns, Ecological Modelling 220, no.66 (Mar 2009): 805–820.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.12.019D. L. Breitburg, J. K. Craig, R. S. Fulford, K. A. Rose, W. R. Boynton, D. C. Brady, B. J. Ciotti, R. J. Diaz, K. D. Friedland, J. D. Hagy, D. R. Hart, A. H. Hines, E. D. Houde, S. E. Kolesar, S. W. Nixon, J. A. Rice, D. H. Secor, T. E. Targett Nutrient enrichment and fisheries exploitation: interactive effects on estuarine living resources and their management, (Jan 2009): 31–47.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3385-7_4Akihiko Mougi, Kinya Nishimura Enrichment can damp population cycles: a balance of inflexible and flexible interactions, Oikos 117, no.1111 (Oct 2008): 1732–1740.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16688.xAkihiko Mougi, Kinya Nishimura Enrichment can damp population cycles: a balance of inflexible and flexible interactions, Oikos 75 (Jul 2008).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16688.xJingyang Zhao, Maryam Ramin, Vincent Cheng, George B. Arhonditsis Plankton community patterns across a trophic gradient: The role of zooplankton functional groups, Ecological Modelling 213, no.3-43-4 (May 2008): 417–436.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.01.016Lev R. Ginzburg, Christopher X.J. Jensen, Jeffrey V. Yule Aiming the “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” at ecological theory, Ecological Modelling 207, no.2-42-4 (Oct 2007): 356–362.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.015Shovonlal Roy, J Chattopadhyay The stability of ecosystems: A brief overview of the paradox of enrichment, Journal of Biosciences 32, no.22 (Mar 2007): 421–428.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0040-1Christopher X.J. Jensen, Lev R. Ginzburg Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out, Ecological Modelling 188, no.11 (Oct 2005): 3–14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.001Michael G Neubert, Tin Klanjscek, Hal Caswell Reactivity and transient dynamics of predator–prey and food web models, Ecological Modelling 179, no.11 (Nov 2004): 29–38.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.05.001Steven Declerck, Vanessa Geenens, Nicole Podoor, José Maria Conde Porcuna, Luc De Meester Intraspecific density dependence in the dynamics of zooplankton under hypertrophic conditions, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60, no.88 (Aug 2003): 919–928.https://doi.org/10.1139/f03-077XU CAI-LIN, LI ZI-ZHEN Effect of Diffusion and Spatially Varying Predation Risk on the Dynamics and Equilibrium Density of a Predator–Prey System, Journal of Theoretical Biology 219, no.11 (Nov 2002): 73–82.https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3110DEBORAH R. HART Intraguild Predation, Invertebrate Predators, and Trophic Cascades in Lake Food Webs, Journal of Theoretical Biology 218, no.11 (Sep 2002): 111–128.https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3053Cai-lin Xu, Zi-zhen Li Influence of intraspecific density dependence on a three-species food chain with and without external stochastic disturbances, Ecological Modelling 155, no.11 (Sep 2002): 71–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00067-4 Jeremy W. Fox Testing a Simple Rule for Dominance in Resource Competition. J. W. Fox, The American Naturalist 159, no.33 (Jul 2015): 305–319.https://doi.org/10.1086/338543Edward McCauley, Roger M. Nisbet, William W. Murdoch, Andre M. de Roos, William S. C. Gurney Large-amplitude cycles of Daphnia and its algal prey in enriched environments, Nature 402, no.67626762 (Dec 1999): 653–656.https://doi.org/10.1038/45223Kevin L. Kirk ENRICHMENT CAN STABILIZE POPULATION DYNAMICS: AUTOTOXINS AND DENSITY DEPENDENCE, Ecology 79, no.77 (Oct 1998): 2456–2462.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2456:ECSPDA]2.0.CO;2W. W. Murdoch, R. M. Nisbet, E. McCauley, A. M. deRoos, W. S. C. Gurney PLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DYNAMICS ACROSS NUTRIENT LEVELS: TESTS OF HYPOTHESES, Ecology 79, no.44 (Jun 1998): 1339–1356.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1339:PAADAN]2.0.CO;2 Roger Arditi , Lev R. Ginzburg , and H. Resit Akcakaya Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes: A Case for Ratio-Dependent Predation Models, The American Naturalist 138, no.55 (Oct 2015): 1287–1296.https://doi.org/10.1086/285286