Abstract

This quantitative study aimed at exploring the beliefs about the use of the inquiry-based learning strategy. Where the researcher found that there is a major deficiency in the classroom practice of the survey strategy, and that the old thought is still in control of the modern science teacher, and there are teachers who do not accept the results that students obtain through their investigative activities if they differ with the result that he wants, or that recorded in Guide. The study adopted the descriptive method, the tool for data collection is; a scale for measuring of beliefs based on the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) consists of (45) items, distributed in (3) axes. The findings indicated that: the mean score of science teachers’ beliefs on the use of inquiry-based learning strategy was (14.20), which reflects a positive belief and intention within teachers to use the inquiry-based learning strategy. The study also pointed to a positive attitude towards the use of the strategy as the mean score of the behavioral beliefs was (17.01) .In addition, the study revealed a social impact as the mean score of the normative beliefs was (10.06) with a weakness in behavioral controlling as the mean score of control beliefs was (-12.87).

Highlights

  • Alshahraniu, Eamir Eabdalalh; Walsueid, Saeid Muhamad. (1997)

  • The findings indicated that: the mean score of science teachers’ beliefs on the use of inquiry-based learning strategy was (14.20), which reflects a positive belief and intention within teachers to use the inquiry-based learning strategy

  • ‫‪ٚ‬لذ ٌّظ اٌجبؽش ِٓ خلاي ػذد ِٓ اٌّمبثلاد اٌشخظ‪١‬خ اٌز‪ ٟ‬أعشا٘ب ِغ اٌّؼٍّ‪ٚ ٓ١‬ع‪ٛ‬د ِ‪ٔ ً١‬ؾ‪ٛ‬‬ ‫اعزخذاَ إعزشار‪١‬غ‪١‬خ اٌزؼٍُ اٌّجٕ‪ ٟ‬ػٍ‪ ٝ‬الاعزمظبء ‪ٚ‬سنجخ ف‪ ٟ‬رؼٍُ اٌّض‪٠‬ذ ػٕ‪ٙ‬ب‪٘ٚ ،‬زا وبْ ِزفمبً‬ ‫رّبِب ِغ ٔزبئظ اٌّم‪١‬بط اٌز‪ ٞ‬وشف ػٓ ارغبٖ إ‪٠‬غبث‪ٌ ٟ‬ذ‪ ٜ‬اٌّؼٍّ‪ٔ ٓ١‬ؾ‪ ٛ‬اعزخذاَ الإعزشار‪١‬غ‪١‬خ ؽ‪١‬ش‬ ‫‪ٚ‬لغ اٌّز‪ٛ‬عؾ اٌؾغبث‪ٌٍّ ٟ‬ؼزمذاد اٌغٍ‪ٛ‬و‪١‬خ ف‪ ٟ‬اٌّذ‪ ٜ‬اٌّ‪ٛ‬عت ثم‪ّ١‬خ ثٍغذ (‪ ِٓ )17.01‬اٌّذ‪-( ٜ‬‬ ‫‪ 44‬إٌ‪ ،)44 ٝ‬وّب ؽظٍذ اٌؼجبساد اٌّّضٍخ ٌٍٕزبئظ الإ‪٠‬غبث‪١‬خ اٌّزشرجخ ػٍ‪ ٝ‬اعزخذاَ الإعزشار‪١‬غ‪١‬خ‬ ‫ػٍ‪ ٝ‬أػٍ‪ ٝ‬اٌّز‪ٛ‬عطبد ‪ٚ‬ؽجمب ٌٕظش‪٠‬خ اٌغٍ‪ٛ‬ن اٌّخطؾ فئْ ٘زا ‪٠‬ىشف ػٓ الارغبٖ الإ‪٠‬غبث‪ٔ ٟ‬ؾ‪ٛ‬‬ ‫أداء اٌغٍ‪ٛ‬ن (‪ٚ )Ajzen, 1991‬اٌز‪ٕ٘ ٛ٘ ٞ‬ب اعزخذاَ إعزشار‪١‬غ‪١‬خ اٌزؼٍُ اٌّجٕ‪ ٟ‬ػٍ‪ ٝ‬الاعزمظبء ف‪ٟ‬‬ ‫رذس‪٠‬ظ اٌؼٍ‪٠ٚ .َٛ‬فغش اٌجبؽش رٌه ف‪ ٟ‬أْ اٌّؼٍّ‪ ٓ١‬رأصش‪ٚ‬ا فؼلا ثبٌز‪ٛ‬عٗ اٌغذ‪٠‬ذ ٌ‪ٛ‬صاسح اٌزشث‪١‬خ‬ ‫اٌزؼٍ‪ٔ ُ١‬ؾ‪ ٛ‬اٌزؼٍُ اٌّشرىض ػٍ‪ ٝ‬اٌطبٌت‪ٚ ،‬اٌؾش ػٍ‪ ٝ‬الاعزمظبء ف‪ ٟ‬رذس‪٠‬ظ اٌؼٍ‪ٚ ،َٛ‬رغ‪١١‬ش‬ ‫إٌّب٘ظ اٌذساع‪١‬خ؛ إلا أْ رٌه اٌزأصش ٌُ ‪٠‬ىٓ ثبٌشىً اٌىج‪١‬ش‪٘ٚ ،‬زا ‪٠‬فغش ػذَ ل‪ٛ‬ح الارغبٖ الإ‪٠‬غبث‪ٟ‬‬ ‫ٌذ‪ ُٙ٠‬ؽ‪١‬ش أْ اٌّؼٍّ‪ِ ٓ١‬بصاٌ‪ٛ‬ا ‪٠‬ش‪ ْٚ‬أْ اعزخذاَ إعزشار‪١‬غ‪١‬خ اٌزؼٍُ اٌّجٕ‪ ٟ‬ػٍ‪ ٝ‬الاعزمظبء ِؾبؽ‬ ‫ثىض‪١‬ش ِٓ اٌّزبػت ‪ٚ‬إٌزبئظ اٌز‪ ٟ‬لا ‪٠‬ؾجز‪ٙٔٚ‬ب وبعز‪ٙ‬لان ِض‪٠‬ذ ِٓ اٌ‪ٛ‬لذ ‪ٚ‬ؽذ‪ٚ‬س اٌف‪ٛ‬ػ‪ ٝ‬داخً‬ ‫اٌظف‪ٚ ،‬ػذَ عذ‪٠‬خ ثؼغ اٌطلاة ف‪ ٟ‬اٌؼًّ‪ ،‬أ‪ ٚ‬رؼشػ‪ٌ ُٙ‬جؼغ ا‪٤‬خطبس‪٠ .‬فغش اٌجبؽش رٌه‬

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Alshahraniu, Eamir Eabdalalh; Walsueid, Saeid Muhamad. (1997). Tadris Aleulum fi Altaelim Aleami.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.