Abstract
The single electron transistor (SET) is a nanoscale switching device with a simple equivalent circuit. It can work very fast as it is based on the tunneling of single electrons. Its nanostructure contains a quantum dot island whose material impacts on the device operation. Carbon allotropes such as fullerene (C60), carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene nanoscrolls (GNSs) can be utilized as the quantum dot island in SETs. In this study, multiple quantum dot islands such as GNS-CNT and GNS-C60 are utilized in SET devices. The currents of two counterpart devices are modeled and analyzed. The impacts of important parameters such as temperature and applied gate voltage on the current of two SETs are investigated using proposed mathematical models. Moreover, the impacts of CNT length, fullerene diameter, GNS length, and GNS spiral length and number of turns on the SET’s current are explored. Additionally, the Coulomb blockade ranges (CB) of the two SETs are compared. The results reveal that the GNS-CNT SET has a lower Coulomb blockade range and a higher current than the GNS-C60 SET. Their charge stability diagrams indicate that the GNS-CNT SET has smaller Coulomb diamond areas, zero-current regions, and zero-conductance regions than the GNS-C60 SET.
Highlights
The single electron transistor (SET) is an electronic device that can realize fast switching using nanotechnology [1]
This is due to the fact that in the proposed current models, thinner tunnel barriers exist with larger-sized graphene nanoscrolls (GNSs) islands
The comparative study of these figures reveals the fact that the impact of GNS length variation on the device current was more significant in the GNS-carbon nanotubes (CNTs) SET than the GNS-C60 SET
Summary
The single electron transistor (SET) is an electronic device that can realize fast switching using nanotechnology [1]. The electron transmission coefficient for the SET with one GNS island is calculated as: TG N S ( E) The transmission coefficient for a GNS-C60 SET and the Landauer formalism are utilized for the drain–source current modeling of this nanoscale device as follows: Ids1 η
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.