Abstract
Building Information Modeling (BIM) has become a must in architecture when it comes to new buildings, but in heritage buildings and in rehabilitation projects, it is still a debate if it’s useful or efficient to make a BIM model. In this paper we analyze and propose When, How and Why modeling in BIM should be a standard process for rehabilitation projects in which an architectural has been performed. In the field of heritage architecture, archeology and rehabilitation, to create an as-built model to work on, it is needed an architectural survey using a laser scan or/and photogrammetry, which captures dense 3D measurements of the building, so architects can make studies of its geometry, detect pathologies and use it as a base for their new designs. However, even though the 3D surveying technics has evolved in the recent years, in the world architecture, the point clouds are still pretty unknown, therefore for many architects are useless information in that format. So, it is necessary to convert this 3D information as point clouds to a more common file like 2D vector drawings in CAD. For this process, it should be question if and how modeling in BIM from the point cloud (scan to BIM) helps to this purpose, without taking into the account that modeling in BIM you get a BIM model, which in rehabilitation and heritage is still not common enough to work with it. Analyzing the information of the point clouds, the typology of the building, the timings, the precision required, and how works a BIM software (Revit) and its libraries; we conclude that, in some particular projects, as far as technology and architecture field are nowadays, to make a useful documentation for rehabilitation modeling in BIM the building in a specific LoD directly from a point cloud (scan to BIM), it is an upgrade in the process beyond the fact of having a BIM model, that is to say, you can get the same documents, but with better quality results, in a more efficient way and less time spend. We ended up with a list of characteristics a building must have for this scan to BIM process is an efficient step and how this should be performed. This paper explores the efficiency of the Scan to BIM process for specific rehabilitation projects, testing it in two different case studies: a large scale building with repetitive elements (old military hospital in Valencia) and a small one with unique elements (classified single family house in Barcelona).
Highlights
The incentive of this study was born from the need of the VIMAC lab to distinguish methodologies to document and represent heritage buildings, in relation to the objectives, scopes, time limits of the projects and the representation techniques, that every project individually requires; even though all in all they define common approximation methodologies
This paper explores the efficiency of the Scan to Building Information Modeling (BIM) process for specific rehabilitation projects, testing it in two different case studies: a large scale building with repetitive elements and a small one with unique elements
A survey done by EspcioBIM, shows that the 28% of the participants (2000 people that works in this sector) don’t know BIM, a 31% slightly knows it, a 25% knows enough, and just a 16% knows it in depth
Summary
The incentive of this study was born from the need of the VIMAC lab to distinguish methodologies to document and represent heritage buildings, in relation to the objectives, scopes, time limits of the projects and the representation techniques, that every project individually requires; even though all in all they define common approximation methodologies. For 2020, it is expected for all the public infrastructures and equipment to be produced in BIM in all their phases: design, construction and maintenance In this context, we made some research and test on how to apply in real projects the BIM techniques for the documentation of heritage buildings for rehabilitation projects, with the objective of determining if modelling in BIM was an efficient process to generate 2D vector drawings needed in this kind of projects. In this project, making the Scan to BIM process was close to be as efficient as drawing directly a 2D vector plan with CAD from the raster It was useful since it had a really low detail and without creating families (elements were redrawn with detail in CAD afterwards). We have tested, analyzed and compared 5 methodologies: 1. Raster drawings: Making 2D images of a point cloud with a point cloud software, choosing a specific scale and visible information (RGB, intensity, depth...)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.